Top

news

Stories

 

L.A. City Attorney Race: One Cooley Customer

The white-hot battle between Trutanich and Weiss

Well over a year ago, District Attorney Steve Cooley was having lunch with one of his most respected former prosecutors, Curt Livesay, at a favorite spot — probably Langer’s Deli, although Cooley no longer recalls for sure.

Enjoying his sandwich, Cooley was making final a long-considered decision that carried the potential to badly backfire on the D.A. He was going to openly push for the election of Livesay’s colleague at a busy private law firm, political unknown and former prosecutor Carmen Trutanich, in the 2009 Los Angeles city attorney race against odds-on favorite and mayoral ally Jack Weiss.

The last D.A. to be returned to office for a third term by county voters, before Cooley won that distinction, was Buron Fitts, a larger-than-life prosecutor from 1928 to 1940 who once got shot in a volley of gunfire, was indicted for bribery and then acquitted, and later worked in Army intelligence. Between Fitts and Cooley, voters consistently forced the D.A. out after one or two terms.

Cooley has survived in that hot seat partly by avoiding embarrassing controversies. Yet here he was, deciding to take on a deep-pocketed downtown political apparatus run by the hyperpolitical Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who has spent much of his time not addressing city problems, but instead building a political machine that includes much of the Los Angeles Unified School board and even the chief of police, William J. Bratton.

With less than two weeks until the May 19 election, Cooley’s decision at Langer’s has not backfired. Instead, it has set City Hall on tenterhooks and spurred an old-fashioned, mud-slinging race between two very different candidates that is either man’s to lose.

“It’s a hot election, I’ll tell you, with a lot of heat and a lot of rancor,” says Cooley today. “But you know what? This is healthy. It’s healthy. It’s really, really, really good for L.A.”

Without the Los Angeles Times poll to offer its predictions (it went defunct last fall), nobody knows who has the momentum. But both candidates have cause for sleeplessness.

In the March primary, Weiss, a city councilman, beat Trutanich 36 percent to 27 percent, giving Trutanich a bigger hill to climb to victory in May. Yet many analysts saw the primary as a big “anybody but Weiss” vote, because four candidates — Trutanich, Michael Amerian, David Berger and Noel Weiss — captured 63.76 percent of the vote and forced Weiss into a runoff.

Dick Rosengarten, editor of the respected political newsletter CalPeek (calpeek.org), says he was “in shock” when Weiss got only 36 percent. “Now my belief is: Carmen Trutanich, it’s his race to win or lose.”

Trying to explain how Weiss ended up on the defensive, Rosengarten says, “There’s an old saying in politics, ‘You can’t hit people and expect them to like you.’ ... It was more than a bunch of disgruntled homeowners. It’s the [proliferating] billboards. It’s the overdevelopment without concern about traffic issues. It’s environmental issues.”

Then several days ago, Sheriff Lee Baca slammed Weiss for his “reckless disregard for the truth” — and yanked his endorsement of Weiss after having spent months praising both men. The cause of Baca’s ire: Weiss’ negative campaign, being run by opposition research expert Ace Smith.

Political consultant Leo Briones says “that’s not good” for Weiss. Briones gives a slight edge to Weiss but says, “Clearly Trutanich is catching up to him.... I would right now — just from my feeling — I would say it’s a toss-up.”

Another development indicates a real horse race as voters begin mailing in their absentee ballots. Although Weiss vastly outspent Trutanich in March — by about $1 million — that was no longer the case by mid-April, when Trutanich slightly outdid Weiss in campaign fund-raising and, thanks to city matching funds, had more cash on hand than Weiss.

Political consultant Parke Skelton says Cooley’s endorsement isn’t influencing voters “by any stretch of the imagination.” And in fact, endorsements generally have little effect on what most voters do. But key endorsements can dramatically raise an unknown candidate’s profile and ability to raise funds.

That’s what has unfolded since Cooley decided more than a year ago that, in a city the size of L.A., the election of its top lawyer shouldn’t be pre-ordained at City Hall.

 
  • Greg Fuentes 05/18/2009 9:54:00 AM

    To: "bobby from l.a.," regarding your May 17th, 2009, 00:25 am, two-sentence post. Regarding your first sentence, I agree with you that my comments were "very disparaging." They were also extremely accurate. Your second sentence contained actionable falsehoods. Feel freely to more fully identify yourself and provide an address where I may have you served, so that I may initiate a successful libel suit. As matters now stand, your comments are extreme examples of the lies of a coward. To LA Weekly: Concerning the lies contained in the May 17, 2009, 00:25 am post, this May 17th (Pacific Time) comment by me constitutes my first request to your organization that you remove the May 17, 2009, 00:25 am comments, in their entirety. Should you not timely remove the lies contained in the May 17, 2009, 00:25 am comments, I will initiate all appropriate legal action against your organization. Thank you, Greg Fuentes

  • bobby 05/17/2009 10:25:00 AM

    I find Greg Fuentes' comments very disparaging. You may or may not be aware that Greg Fuentes is a former Los Angeles City employee who had a restraining order issued against him due to harassment of ITA female employees.

  • Robert 05/09/2009 3:23:00 AM

    Thanks to Cooley for giving us a choice--for once. I hope Trutanich wins-I've had it with downtown photo-op slicksters like Weiss. He has done nothing to merit electio. he missed crucial votes, sold out to developers and billboard companies. The attempted recall by his own district is a big red flag too.

  • David Berger 05/07/2009 1:27:00 PM

    Steve Cooley's choice of battles is both an interesting one and at the same time, perhaps, a predictable one. If there's one thing Cooley cannot abide it's corruption; whether by elected officials or members of the justice system. The betrayal of public trust strikes at the very core of our democracy and our marvelous freedoms. When Cooley became District Attorney eight years ago, he created two special prosecutorial divisions - the Justice System Integrity Division and the Public Integrity Division; both designed to aggressively investigate and prosecute corruption by those we trust to protect and represent us. Cooley's choice of battles appears to be the 'no brainer' result of eight years experience with the cases handled by both divisions. The focus clearly was on corruption in City Hall, and if the nation's second largest city was to avoid being tarred with the same brush of shame as Chicago, something had to change. So it's really no surprise that as Rocky Delgadillo's term as City Attorney was ending on its own particularly sour note, and that as Jack Weiss threw his hat into the ring, Cooley felt that it was time to draw a line in the sand, and stick his neck out into City politics. That Cooley chose Carmen Trutanich as the man to champion the fight to restore honor to the City Attorney's Office, and keep the politicians honest is also no surprise. Trutanich had a long and highly successful career in the DA's Office, and since entering private practice, has an unblemished record as straight shooter and a credible advocate in both civil and criminal law. What better candidate in Trutanich could Cooley find as the prospect of the City of Los Angeles falling into the hands of Jack Weiss must have sent a shiver up Cooley's spine. Jack Weiss is not unknown to the DA's Office. Weiss is no stranger to investigations into pay-to-play political corruption. Cooley's special divisions had not only prosecuted and convicted Weiss associates for money-laundering campaign contributions, but had also hauled Weiss before a Grand Jury investigating Weiss's involvement in corruption at the Entertainment Industry Development Corporation. Weiss has pedigree paralleled only, perhaps, by Rod Blagojevich, however thus far Weiss has more in common with the 'Teflon Don' as he has thus far evaded prosecution himself by being able to claim 'ignorance' of the illegality practiced under his nose. All that might change, however, because of Weiss's involvement in an illegal fundraiser on Monday, April 27, as reported in the LA Times. Weiss had attended a campaign fundraiser in at $16M Beverly Hills mansion that is home to celebrity philanthropists Daphna and Richard Ziman. Co-Host to the fundraiser was one Kelly Candaele, a person appointed by the Mayor to serve on the City's pension board. Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 49.7.8 prohibits City employees and appointees from engaging in political fundraising - it's a misdemeanor crime. Yet there was Weiss at a fundraiser hosted by City appointee Kelly Candaele. The fundraiser yielded some $20,000 for Weiss, and Weiss took the money. The following day, LA Times reporter David Zahniser contacted the Mayor's office to obtain an explanation into the illegal fundraiser. Within 4 hours Kelly Candaele was thrown under the bus and had resigned. The Weiss campaign spokesperson, Ace Smith, stated that the donations were being returned. If it was hoped that Candaele's resignation would put an end to the matter, those hopes appear to be misplaced. Some might say Weiss is equally culpable and this time Weiss appears to have a much harder task ahead of him in with his historical claim of 'ignorance.' Weiss not only voted for LA Municipal Code Section 49.7.8, but he also voted to appoint Candaele to the pension board. Weiss, therefore cannot claim 'not to have known' Candaele was a City appointee, neither can he claim not to know the law - to do so would undermine his self-proclaimed qualification for the job of City Attorney. Cooley, one might well conclude, choose not only the right battle to draw that line in sand for City corruption, but also chose the right champion in Carmen Trutanich. That Jack Weiss is providing the perfect example of all that is wrong with City Hall is as entirely coincidental as it was entirely predictable. Los Angelenos will decide the outcome of Cooley's battle on May 19.

  • Greg Fuentes 05/07/2009 1:06:00 PM

    Weiss has reportedly spent millions of dollars on his campaign for City Attorney. He has been bombarding my cable television system with his advertisements. One interesting aspect I find in the Weiss� ads I have seen is that they do not discuss any significant accomplishments by Weiss during his seven-plus years as a City Councilperson. Perhaps that is why so many of Weiss� ads are attack ads against Carmen Trutanich and the clients Trutanich has represented as a defense attorney. Some of us may not care for some of Trutanich's clients. However, Trutanich apparently represents his clients well. As a resident of City Council District 5, which Weiss was elected to serve, I am not convinced that Weiss has represented this District or the City in general in an acceptable manner. For a person running for the City Attorney position, Weiss has displayed a troubling lack of respect for applicable laws. When Weiss ran for the District 5 Councilmember position in 2001, his campaign received thousands of dollars in laundered campaign funds from Casden Properties. The Weiss campaign also received matching funds from the City of Los Angeles tied to these illegal campaign contributions. Eight years later, Weiss has yet to reimburse the City or any other governmental entity with respect to these illegal contributions. For other violations in his 2001 City Council campaign, Weiss�s campaign was fined thousands of dollars by the City�s Ethics Commission. Within the past month, Weiss participated in a fundraiser that violated City ethical provisions that were adopted by the City Council while Weiss was a councilmember. Only after the Los Angeles Times began inquiring into this matter, did the Weiss campaign agree to return the funds�allegedly around $20,000�Weiss collected at this fundraiser. None of the Weiss attack ads against Trutanich have discussed any ethical violations by Trutanich. If any existed, I would expect that Weiss� millions would have brought them to light. Apparently, in his race for City Attorney, Weiss expects City of Los Angeles residents to give him a pass for seven years of ineffectiveness as a Councilmember and repeated ethical violations. We�ll see if Los Angeles voters are willing to overlook Weiss� often appalling record.

  • Greg Fuentes 05/07/2009 12:13:00 PM

    Weiss has reportedly spent millions of dollars on his campaign for City Attorney. He has been bombarding my cable television system with his advertisements. One interesting aspect I find in the Weiss� ads I have seen is that they do not discuss any significant accomplishments by Weiss during his seven-plus years as a City Councilperson. Perhaps that is why so many of Weiss� ads are attack ads against Carmen Trutanich and the clients Trutanich has represented as a defense attorney. Some of us may not care for some of Trutanich's clients. However, Trutanich apparently represents his clients well. As a resident of City Council District 5, which Weiss was elected to serve, I am not convinced that Weiss has represented this District or the City in general in an acceptable manner. For a person running for the City Attorney position, Weiss has displayed a troubling lack of respect for applicable laws. When Weiss ran for the District 5 Councilmember position in 2001, his campaign received thousands of dollars in laundered campaign funds from Casden Properties. The Weiss campaign also received matching funds from the City of Los Angeles tied to these illegal campaign contributions. Eight years later, Weiss has yet to reimburse the City or any other governmental entity with respect to these illegal contributions. For other violations in his 2001 City Council campaign, Weiss�s campaign was fined thousands of dollars by the City�s Ethics Commission. Within the past month, Weiss participated in a fundraiser that violated City ethical provisions that were adopted by the City Council while Weiss was a councilmember. Only after the Los Angeles Times began inquiring into this matter, did the Weiss campaign agree to return the funds�allegedly around $20,000�Weiss collected at this fundraiser. None of the Weiss attack ads against Trutanich have discussed any ethical violations by Trutanich. If any existed, I would expect that Weiss� millions would have brought them to light. Apparently, in his race for City Attorney, Weiss expects City of Los Angeles residents to give him a pass for seven years of ineffectiveness as a Councilmember and repeated ethical violations. We�ll see if Los Angeles voters are willing to overlook Weiss� often appalling record.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy