10% OFF BILL - INC. ALCOHOL!
Los Angeles, CA 90048
Though he no longer sportsthe black trunks, sockless black boots and gut-twisting scowl with which he cut such a menacing figure in the ring, Mike Tyson hasn’t lost his knack for making an entrance. When he arrives at the Green Valley Ranch resort in Henderson, Nevada, he does so as inconspicuously as it may be possible for one of the most recognized and controversial sports figures of the past quarter-century, loping silently through the lobby in an elegantly tailored gray pinstripe suit decidedly more Hugo Boss than the outré Versace couture he favored at the peak of his flamboyant past. No paparazzi herald his arrival, no entourage follows behind, and the journalists with whom he has come to discuss what might be the comeback of his career number not in the hundreds but rather the handful. Yet even with this deliberately stealth arrival on a sleepy weekday afternoon, Tyson’s very presence seems to reverberate throughout the hotel as if by sonar. No sooner is he seated just inside the open door of a small conference room on a quiet upper floor than an inordinately large number of guests have an urgent, simultaneous need of the hallway ice machine.
The location has been selected for its proximity to Tyson’s home, though its symbolic value does not go unnoticed. We are but a short drive from the glittering lights of the Las Vegas Strip, where 22 years ago the not-yet-household-name delivered a lethal uppercut to the skull of Trevor Berbick to become, at age 20, the youngest heavyweight champ on record. Where, the following year, he defeated Tony Tucker to unify the IBF, WBA and WBC heavyweight crowns. Where, in 1997, he shocked his fans and detractors alike — to say nothing of his opponent, Evander Holyfield — with the ear bite heard ’round the world. However, in spite of the many multimillion-dollar attempts to lure Tyson back into the ring in the four years since he announced his retirement, the comeback he is here to promote will take place not beneath the lights of a crowded Vegas arena but in a theater near you.
Directed by James Toback, Tyson is not the first movie to address its subject’s celebrated rise to the Olympus of modern sports mythology and his subsequent fall — far more crushing than any blow he ever sustained from an opponent — to the bottomless depths of the tabloid inferno. The acclaimed documentarian Barbara Kopple earned an Emmy nomination for her 1993 television film, Fallen Champ: The Untold Story of Mike Tyson, which followed the fighter from his childhood on the violent streets of Brownsville, Brooklyn, to his 1992 incarceration in an Indiana prison on a rape conviction. Many subsequent hours produced by the likes of A&E and ESPN have addressed the 16 years since. But Tyson is the first movie to approach Tyson himself with the careful consideration and lack of preconception found in the best boxing writers and essayists (such as Pete Hamill and Joyce Carol Oates), the first that treats Tyson as a complex and contradictory character who cannot easily be shoehorned into a rags-to-riches-to-rags narrative. It is also the first that allows him to tell his story exclusively in his own words.
For 90 uninterrupted minutes, there is only one talking head in Tyson, and it is one that speaks with startling alacrity and candor about the humiliating taunts he suffered as a chunky, high-voiced mama’s boy; the petty criminality that earned him street respect and, ultimately, time served in a youth correctional facility; the confidence and sense of purpose he gained from boxing; the sharply honed physical and psychological manipulation he deployed in the ring; the qualities he seeks in a woman; his inability to manage money. Above all, Tyson speaks of the consuming desire to truly know thyself.
“The first question we ask is, ‘Who am I?’” Tyson says in the film’s opening scene, just before a close-up of his tattooed face transforms into a split-screen mosaic of multiple Tysons whose voices collide and overlap on the soundtrack. One, rising above the rest, speaking of “the chaos of the brain.”
It’s hardly surprising that Tyson should begin by positing himself in terms of multiple personalities, or that Toback, a veteran of mental chaos himself, should choose to embrace them. From his earliest days as an amateur fighter, observers noted the disparity between the savage, fearsome gladiator that Tyson appeared to be inside the ring and the soft-spoken teenager he seemed outside it — an intensely disciplined young man who raised pigeons, studied vintage fight films with the dedication of a doctoral candidate, and lived in predominantly white Catskill, New York, where he had become something of a surrogate son to his septuagenarian trainer, Cus D’Amato. Nor have the subsequent two decades made it any easier to herd the many Mike Tysons into a single Freudian bullpen. Indeed, it is as if, with time, Tyson has only further divided and multiplied.
There has been Tyson the hamstrung spouse, sitting silently on Barbara Walters’ sofa while, during an infamous 20/20 interview, Robin Givens described him as a manic-depressive brute; Tyson the volcanic firebrand, threatening to turn his opponents into his girlfriend, to eat their children, or to smash their noses into their brains; Tyson the convict intellectual, who used prison to complete his formal education, immersing himself in Tolstoy, Machiavelli and Mao Zedong with the same intensity he once reserved for those flickering images of Jack Dempsey and Henry Armstrong; and Tyson the slain giant, who refused to come out of his corner after six uninspired rounds against Irish challenger Kevin McBride and then told reporters that he didn’t wish to disrespect boxing by continuing to lose to fighters of McBride’s caliber.
He's still doing it! Happened to me today in Manhattan.
Ewww is right. Same thing Victoria describied with Toback happened to me and others over 2 decades ago on Sunset Blvd. in L A and I know it's happened elsewhere in town, he was famous or infamous for it and played on this in his Pickup Artist, and I recall there was a book which mentioned this. He kept following me in a way that was creepy yet managed to be unintimidating, because he blurted out his credits and I remembered at least two of his films -- it struck me as so odd that a famous person would resort to something like this and so openly, without any shame. After a few times he sat down at my table where I was having coffee and it was clear some famous at least B-level actresses had succumbed to his advances, in hopes of furthering their careers; I overheard him on the phone discussing the uninhibited sexual efforts of one name actress to fulfill her end of the deal, and he advised the guy on the other side to try the same (apparently directing a tv show), that she'd do anything while her boyfriend was out of town, but froze up soon as he hit the tarmac at LAX, and suggested the guy get cozy with her secretary to learn her schedule. It sounded like they actually made an effort to uphold their end of the quid-pro-quo as long as the actress wasn't too picky about what parts she got -- they discussed Toback's latest conquest, a very sexy actress known more for wearing few clothes than for her lines, and what offers they could scare up for her with friends. And despite this sliminess, he was known to have the ear and backing of Warren Beatty and others who knew that beneath this slimy persona was a brilliant Harvard mind uniquely suited to document the sleazy secret lives of others like himself who lived outside social norms. Toback was profiled as also taking a meeting at the Harvard Club in Manhattan showing up in a jacket and tie, and white underwear and socks, a la Tom Cruise. Beatty told a reporter at the time that he knew what Toback was like, but considered himself a brilliantly unique vision. Indeed. This makes me uncomfortable about the subtext of this movie and the relationship between Toback's and his subject's inner demons, relationships to women as reflects their own inner insecurities and how those relate to their own appearance and problems with self-image, due to their being made fun of for their looks when younger (this is stated in Tyson's case and can be surmised in Toback's). Seeing Tyson through such notorious eyes gives the movie, this article, the photo of them together and everything surrounding the making and promotion of this movie. While the piece is well-written as far as it goes, it doesn't go nearly deep enough in investigating the filmmaker whose own notorious and self-consciously perverted persona is the weirdly brilliant yet slimy filter to the rest of the world.
Scott Foundas is another in a long line of writers that have bought into the celebrity of Mike Tyson rather than truly evaluate his contribution to the sport of boxing. Tyson can be described best as overrated when one examines who he fought in a career that self-destructed. While Tyson should be recognized for winning the title at the age of twenty, his career mimicks Floyd Patterson after the Marciano reign of the 1950's when Patterson became champion practially by default and his defeat of an aging light heavyweight, Archie Moore. Tyson's ring activity in between 1985 and 1987 saw him go 32-0 against carefully selected opponents, weak contenders, aging ex-champions and overblown light heavyweights. Consider the fact Tyson defeated Trevor Berbick for the title in 1986 only to defend against the likes of James Smith, Pinklon Thomas, Tony Tucker, Tyrell Biggs and Larry Holmes only displayed the division's lack of talent. His one round knockout of Michael Spinks that unified the title was really a heavyweight versus a light heavyweight that moved up because of the vaccum in the heavyweight ranks. His loss to James Buster Douglas In Japan of 1990 while regarded as a monumental upset was really a demonstration in the overall weakness of the division until Riddick Bowe and Evander Holyfield brought some stature back to the heavyweights. After Tyson's loss to Douglas, he finished his career a very average 13-5 with two no contests. The delf destruction of Mike Tyson is based in race. A feeling that White America had it in for him when in reality White America was his biggest fan! His problems with Don King began a steep, downward spiral and the legend of Mike Tyson seems now far larger than the reality.
Thank you for your well written and emotional piece on Tyson.
James Toback, ewwwww. That guy used to hit on me on Manhattan streets over the course of seven years. He hit on a bunch of other women I know. Spy magazine did a hilarious story on his compulsion. The line he used to use on me was "Hi, I'm a director and I'd like to put you in one of my movies." When I told him I wasn't an actress, he persisted. Very soon he got down to the nitty-gritty: "Do you have a boyfriend?" Ugh. Wonder if he's still doing it.
Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...
Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...
More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience
Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info
Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips
Log in or Sign up
Social Connect:Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.
Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:
Sign Up or Log in
Social Connect:Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.
Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:
