Top

arts

Stories

 

Theater Reviews: Land of the Tigers, The Projectionist

Also, The Devil With Boobs, Clown Show for Bruno and more

THEATER PICK  LAND OF THE TIGERS Act 1 of the Burglars of Hamm’s hilarious and thought-provoking comedy, Land of the Tigers, outlandishly crosses Cats with Planet of the Apes. In a whimsical world where felines walk upright and speak English (but thankfully don’t caterwaul “Memory”), a veritable Kingdom of Tigers prance around in feathered wigs and topcoats, while debating important matters (to cats, anyway) in the Tigressional Congress. Amongst this group, the great warrior Sabertooth (Hugo Armstrong) goes into lustful cat heat for sultry she-tiger Sheba (Devin Sidell), which outrages Sheba’s fierce brother Fang Stalkington (Tim Sheridan), who has already fathered several litters with the young beauty. Full of bizarre cat-mating dances, and scenes in which characters shift instantly from conversing to snarling Tiger-style, the Burglars’ comedy is staged by Matt Almos with acrobatic dexterity and perfect comic timing. The reasons for slight touches of campiness become evident in Act 2, however, which follows the cast of dimwitted and absurdly self important actors as they are increasingly brainwashed by their tyrannical, ego-tripping director (a fabulous Michael Livingston, whose eyes glitter with madness). Although the concept possesses slight echoes of Noises Off, the Burglars cunningly explore a different avenue, elegantly satirizing the sense of collective delusion that frequently befalls performers in a mediocre show. The acting work is sprightly, and it’s delightful how the bumbling tiger actors of Act 1 are subsequently revealed as the optimistic, dedicated, yet benighted ensemble of Act 2. The end result, more than calculatedly dippy comedy about cats, is an often compelling meditation on the creation of theater itself, and how the audience will never glimpse the many dramas within a play’s production. Sacred Fools theater, 660 N. Heliotrope Dr., Hollywood; Fri.-Sat., 8, p.m.; Sun., 7 p.m.; through May 3. (310) 281-8337. A Burglars of Hamm, Sacred Fools Co-Production. (Paul Birchall)

GO  THE LETTERS in John W. Lowell’s new two-character drama refer to the explicitly lascivious correspondence of a musician in Soviet Russia, which The Director of the Ministry of Information (Norman Shaw) is trying to locate. It takes a short while for us to realize this, because at the outset, it appears that the Director has called in his subordinate, Anna (Julie Fletcher), for a promotion, which — knowing the corpse-strewn wasteland of the Soviet bureaucracy — she’s reluctant to accept. But The Director will hear none of her protestations (“We’re not interested in what you want”), and soon the widow finds herself entrapped by defending a colleague/lover who’s implicated in a breach of security by the gossip of an alcoholic bureaucrat whose dubious words The Director now takes as gospel — or at least pretends to. Lowell’s cat-and-mouse game of paranoia and entrapment is old stuff, and, under Anne McNaughton’s staging, it unfolds at a pace a little too measured for a new play in 2009, even as Anna transforms nicely from servility to defiance. The world of the play is rendered with such verisimilitude, with Dean Cameron’s costumes, and his set that features none-too-subtle portraits of Lenin and Stalin gazing down upon the action, that one is inclined to heave a sigh of relief that we’re not in Soviet Russia, though I very much doubt this is Lowell’s point. There are two small keys to the lockbox of this play’s meaning: One is The Director’s insistence that the alcoholic witness’ testimony is reliable, despite the appalling lack of corroborating evidence. This is the embodiment of the nastiest aspect of despotism: an “investigation” fueled by a foregone conclusion, which in the recent past has been every bit as American as it was Soviet. The other key is the power of accusation embedded in gossip — the “truth” lies in the accusation rather than the investigation. These are eternal, universal verities that lead directly to the horrors of tyranny. The quality, the detail and the nuance of both performances is among this production’s strengths. Both roles are filled with torrents of language that’s not so easy to render plausibly, and yet both Shaw and Fletcher accomplish just that. NewPlace Studio Theatre, 10950 Peach Grove St., North Hollywood; Thurs.-Sat., 8 p.m.; Sun., 2 p.m.; through April 19. (Steven Leigh Morris)

LITTLE WOMEN — THE MUSICAL A feminist critic once observed that Louisa May Alcott’s beloved novel was told from the point of view of the jailers, not the inmates. In less loaded language, it represented the values of the parents, not the children. This was often the price of writing in the 19th century, which required edifying morals in its stories. Yet Alcott was able to inject enough reality in her tale to make it memorable. This version, however, adapted by Allan Knee, with songs by Jason Howland and Mindi Dickstein, hews strictly to the musical-comedy formula, rendering it genteel and predictable. Every song delivers precisely what we expect, which tends to bore. One wishes they’d stop singing and get on with the story. Still, this rendition is sometimes superior to the Broadway production: It’s more emotionally coherent and touching, if less handsomely designed. Director Thomas Colby serves the piece faithfully, and the performances are generally good. Cassandra Marie Nuss’s Jo is overly brassy but serviceable, Kaitlyn Casanova deftly manages Amy’s transition from bratty child to beautiful woman, and Bonnie Snyder restores the pepper to irascible Aunt March. As for the rest, what they really need is sharper, less sentimental material. Lyric Theatre, 520 North La Brea Ave., Hollywood; Thurs.-Sat., 8 p.m., Sun., 2 p.m., through April 26. (323) 939-9220. (Neal Weaver)

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next Page >>
 
  • ZEK LIGHTNING 02/02/2012 7:45:00 AM

    MY REVIEW OF OK.GOOD. BY DAN MARTINICO; There aren't a lot of words, but there's a great monologue written by Oliver Stone at the end of the film. That is to say they stole an entire monologue from "Conan the barbarian" and used it without Oliver Stone's permission in the guise of being pop-culturally ironic. The problem with that is that its 2012 and pulp fiction was a hell of a long time ago. They're still getting away with the use of a great monologue they can't really take any credit for. These people threatened to have my neck broken and everyone in my family killed. I live in a country where I have no rights and major news networks run ads for the well known cults. I'm defending my life by making it public that Hugo Armstrong threatened to have my neck broken and everyone in my family killed. (It's not easy getting through to the mainstream media,let me tell you.) I challenge any, cult-member, Hugo Armstrong, Dan Martinico, or anyone involved to come and make their case against me in the court of public opinion. I don't need the mainstream media. These people made a film. I've known Hugo Armstrong since 1995. I'm an actor myself. I did a great job even though I was being put through a (well known cult) drill disguised as a film shoot. Martinico and Armstrong construct one mostly wordless chunk of waste after another because neither of them can write their way out of a wet paper bag. The concept for this film was stolen from me in 2 ways. firstly: Before inviting me to work on a short film called "bike thief", Armstrong and Martinco told me that they were interested in making a film that I was currently writing called "entrance to Elsinore." about a Tom Cruise inspired character named Paul Roam. The story revolved around his public meltdown, the spectacular revelation of what his cult really is, and just how powerful and insane they are. It was a far more ambitious and beautiful film than this very small wordless bike thief re-make we have here. Zek Lightning was Hugo Armstrong's roommate at the California institute of the arts and the two had been close friends ever since. The truly diabolical irony of okay.good, Is that Armstrong and Martinico are both involved with cult activity themselves. -and bike thief wasn't actually a film. It was a drill,exactly like the "cultish movement workshop" this character also named "Paul" experiences. On the set of bike thief, Armstrong threatened to have my neck broken and everyone in my family killed because I'd been trying to blow the whistle on at least one of the mafia like cults that both Armstrong and Martinico are members of. Okay good is part rip off of: "entrance to Elsinore" -in which a mega-star is turned into an unknown actor who's cult induced freak-out is far less grand and spectacular than the vision Zek Lightning (Me.) had to tell a real story. Secondly, The rest of Okay.Good. is their attempt to explain away what they did to me on the set of bike thief and to imply that I went crazy during their "cultish movement workshop",which was actually the filming of "bike thief." Cults operate covertly. They can't ask a non-member to participate in a drill, so they invite him to work on a film shoot that actually is a drill. Hugo Armstrong attempted to cover his tracks by sending a thank you gift for participating in a "survival camp" set to film. The point of the film was to subject me to a (well known cult) drill, and threaten my life in an environment where any attempt to contact the authorities would've led to me being arrested or diagnosed with a non-existent mental illness. There was a police officer named Luke who came to see what was going on during the bike thief filming. We were in mount Washington park near the home of then Mmyor, Antonio Villaragosa. There are times when all you have is a right to free speech and all 26 letters of the alphabet. Dan Martinico and Hugo Armstrong threatened to have my neck broken and everyone in my family killed on the set of a short film called bike thief. They just released a feature half based on this (well known cult) drill disguised as a film shoot,and a concept entirely stolen from me about a character based on Tom Cruise. They began to harass me not too long after I wrote the first scene. Hugo Armstrong and Dan Martinico invited me to begin bike thief shortly before my first trip to the emergency room in 2005. I once witnessed a man in a night robe trying to escape from the (well known cult) celebrity center on tamarind and franklin in Hollywood. I Am Zek Lightning TO DAN MARTINICO: YOU'RE TRYING DESPERATELY TO COVER UP THE EVIDENCE OF YOU AND HUGO, BASICALLY ADMITTING THAT I AM BETTER THAN YOU,..WHILE GETTING CAUGHT TRYING TO SUCK MY DICK WHILE I'M ASLEEP. OK.GOOD. ..my ass. THESE 2 ARE COWARDS AND THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING

  • Matt Almos 04/02/2009 10:07:00 PM

    Thanks so much for the great review for LAND OF THE TIGERS. One small correction, if you don't mind: the director character is played by Dean Gregory (Michael Livingston is the name of the character that he plays). Thanks again for paying attention to our show!

 

Most Popular Stories

for free stuff, theater info & more!

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy