-
12/19/2011 4:31:00 PM
relaxing music.
relaxing music
-
james 03/22/2010 10:43:00 PM
It Was Quite Interesting NiceWork I appreciate the information you provided Excellent post.Thank you and My best regards - personal finance
-
somaie 12/31/2009 9:06:00 AM
After last post on marketing without search engines, I decided to follow up with a strategy you can use to get quality free traffic. One of the easiest ways to get visitors to your web site is to spend money. Nothing is more effortless then paying for traffic. But if you can�t afford it or don�t want to pay, there�s an equally simple but free way to get traffic: ad swaps.
="http://www.onlineuniversalwork.com"target="_blank">new vogue in technology australia
-
kiramatali shah 12/24/2009 9:54:00 AM
Everyone has their favorite way of using the internet. Many of us search to find what we want, click in to a specific website, read what�s available and click out. That�s not necessarily a bad thing because it�s efficient. We learn to tune out things we don�t need and go straight for what�s essential.
www.onlineuniversalwork
-
ItaloSuave 06/10/2009 10:57:00 AM
So true, that an individual Blogger's rights to free speech and to publishing and communicating his or her tastes, values, wisdom, commentary and yes, digital files, those very rights the corporate purveyors of mass media and market saturation say they support, OUR RIGHTS, are being violated in surreptitious manner, by a sneaky, grabbing, money hungry, insatiable beast known as the Recording Industry Association of America - RIAA - which, like Microsoft's Digital Rights Management - DRM - Software, grabs your desktop, your files, your privacy, your good taste, and your original work, and deletes or otherwise destroys it. I lost 8,000+ files.
-
Mike Penrod 03/23/2009 10:02:00 AM
A Grand Winter Music Conference is organized by Nikki Beach Music on March 25th, 2009 from 11p.m. It is a true rendezvous for all music lovers.As a mark of popularizing music, Nikki Beach Music have decided to gift the newest CD�s download as an incentive and a token of love and affection for all the online members. This offer remains valid till 22nd March 2009, so don�t delay in joining for availing this exclusive offer. Members of the NikkiBeachMusic.com will also get VIP passes to the Winter Music Conference and meet the stars and have access to the VIP area.
-
Michael Heister 03/07/2009 5:30:00 AM
The best advice I've gotten on Internet-related and other creative pursuits is to make sure you own and control your content. A "free" page from Google's Blogger, or from WordPress for that matter, is subject to the whims of whoever pays the bandwidth bill. Pay $5 a month or so for your own server space and it takes a court order to mess with you. BTW my unadorned but paid-for-by-me blog is at www.thepodosphere.com
-
OliviaB. 03/07/2009 2:33:00 AM
With Google doing this, what else do you suppose it would do when partnered with another big organization. Google is now deciding what is to be deleted or not at will? I like notifying the webmaster instead of taking it into their own Google hands. Will Google turn into Big Brother?
---------
OliviaB.
Portland DUI lawyer
-
Joe 02/22/2009 3:56:00 PM
This is nothing. Google deleted an entire blog on illegal immigration in Chapel Hill NC. There was nothing on this Blogger Blog other than stats and factual information about illegal aliens. The entire blog was destroyed by someone on Goggle's left wing staff because of the political bent of the blog. This is not the only time I've heard of this happening on Blogger, just the one time it affected me personally. Oddly you can find Blogger Blogs extolling the joys of anal sex, beastility, Blogger Blogs that are porn fan sites, and any number of Anti American Blogs on Blogger, but if some Google Mod somewhere sees a political site with which they disagree, it gets deleted. Think this doesn't happen? Why not ask here, LAWEEKELY? You'll find that Google is in the full time business of political censorship.
-
Joe 02/22/2009 3:33:00 PM
This is nothing. Google deleted an entire blog on illegal immigration in Chapel Hill NC. There was nothing on this Blogger Blog other than stats and factual information about illegal aliens. The entire blog was destroyed by someone on Goggle's left wing staff because of the political bent of the blog. This is not the only time I've heard of this happening on Blogger, just the one time it affected me personally. Oddly you can find Blogger Blogs extolling the joys of anal sex, beastility, Blogger Blogs that are porn fan sites, and any number of Anti American Blogs on Blogger, but if some Google Mod somewhere sees a political site with which they disagree, it gets deleted. Think this doesn't happen? Why not ask here, LAWEEKELY? You'll find that Google is in the full time business of political censorship.
-
JoFresh 02/17/2009 11:12:00 AM
bet they won't delete this sweet ass video by Peter Bjorn and John
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=51789705
-
SchuylerKing 02/17/2009 2:02:00 AM
Look at the Guilty-On-Accusation law the RIAA and others pushed through the New Zealand Parliament:
http://amccright.blogspot.com/2009/02/guilt-on-accusation-draconian-internet.html
-
SchuylerKing 02/17/2009 2:01:00 AM
Look at the Guilty-On-Accusation law the RIAA and others pushed through the New Zealand Parliament:
http://amccright.blogspot.com/2009/02/guilt-on-accusation-draconian-internet.html
-
One Weekly Gun 02/17/2009 12:10:00 AM
This is why blogs should never die!
And why I give away all music for free.
One Weekly Gun
-
Uh-oh 02/13/2009 6:59:00 PM
Take that another step, and with the Bush administration all but eliminating our Constitution, imagine the police monitoring your connection to whatever else interests them beyond music with a helpful assist from Google. This being LA, see www.FamilyLawCourts.com/countylosangeles.html
Click on the links in Orange. Yikes.
-
jack 02/13/2009 10:41:00 AM
Its probably cause the music bloggers are stealing copyrighted photos from photographers. and when they send their dmca notice to get their photos removed, they just delete the page rather than deleting just the image. I know i send DMCA's whenever idiots steal my photos, along with a bill.
-
Mundo F1 02/13/2009 2:14:00 AM
I had a similar experience, but not related to music. I used to run the podcastformula1.blogspot.com, which ran news on F1.
We used to post videos of F1 race scenes that could be found on Youtube and general info on the competitions. On November we got an email from the blogger administration indicating that we were to remove posts with copyrighted material, or else they would remove it themselves. To our surprise, four days later 100% of our blog posts were erased, and the domain was freed for anyone to grab it. We basically reopened the account at zero.
-
Josh Ryder 02/13/2009 12:59:00 AM
I say to heck with the DCMA, the MPAA and RIAA! Burn em all!
RT
www.anon-tools.us.tc
-
sly 02/12/2009 11:35:00 PM
What's the issue? There are already too many blogs anyway. They are now becoming points of reference that are essentially an opinion. They are the bane of real information.
-
andrew 02/12/2009 11:09:00 PM
F@ck Google
"Dont be evil Greedle"
-
Mackenzie 02/12/2009 11:17:00 AM
I had a post disappear from my Blogger-hosted blog. My blog is about Linux, not music, and the post was about a clothing accessory I made with Linux commands on it. No IP was infringed, but the post *is* missing in action.
-
Blogger 02/10/2009 10:52:00 PM
Dear Eugenia and any other doubters,
When you say, "I do not believe..." and "These mp3s are 'usually' are meant only for the journalists, so they can write reviews, but NOT to place online for everyone for free..." you are sharing your OPINION and an incomplete vision of how the system works.
As someone this has happened to.... you need to know this. True, bloggers are recognized as a valuable (and a relatively cheap and easy resource) and they do receive press releases for review but they also receive press releases offering up material specifically intended to post from labels and PR houses serving thoses labels.
I have press releases and communications to prove this. Those posts were still removed.
The bottom line is that a press release from the band or their label saying "OK to POST/PUBLISH" should be just that. So while some takedown notices are absolutely legimate, a great deal of those which Blogger is acting on by deleting the "offending blogs" - are not! In the old days, you were innocent until proven guilty, instead of the other way around.
That's where the issue lies.
-
Eugenia 02/10/2009 4:17:00 AM
Just because the labels sent press releases to these "bloggers" with links to a few mp3s, I do not believe they asked them to also put these mp3s up for everyone to download. These mp3s are usually are meant only for the journalists, so they can write reviews, but NOT to place online for everyone for free.
So having followed the links of this article to this guy's music "blog", I find that what Google and/or RIAA did was lawful and within their rights.
If the guy wants to put up mp3s for free, then he should only do so for Creatving Commons or other truly "free" music, not RIAA one. The fault is his for messing with commercial/copyrighted music.
-
Todd Knarr 02/10/2009 3:54:00 AM
I'd note USC Title 17 512(g)(2) regarding liability of the service provider for taken-down material. (g)(1) grants the provider immunity to liability for good-faith takedowns of material in response to a DMCA notice, but (g)(2) says that the provider only gets that immunity if it, among other things, "takes reasonable steps promptly to notify the subscriber that it has removed or disabled access to the material". If Google's taking the material down without giving notice it's doing so, it can't claim immunity from claims by the blog owner if it happens the material was wrongly taken down.
-
Jonathan M Christiansen 02/09/2009 2:35:00 PM
So they gave the guy who leaked GNR tracks house arrest and probation as a sentence. Do they know that bloggers blog from INSIDE their house!? Why wouldn't they force him to NOT be at home....
-
Rick Klau 02/09/2009 12:16:00 AM
Hi - I'm a product manager on Blogger, and I wanted to clarify a few things. Google only removes content when legally obligated, and under U.S. law, we are required to take down content when we receive a valid DMCA notice. When we we do this, we send an email to the blogger using the address associated with their account and submit the original DMCA notice to chillingeffects.org. If a blogger wishes to challenge the DMCA notice, they can file a counter notice, at which time the original DMCA complainant has 14 days to file suit, or we will reinstate the removed content. The whole policy is explained in more detail here: http://www.google.com/blogger_dmca.html.
A good reminder for our users is to ensure that the e-mail address associated with their blog is valid and an address they check regularly; any DMCA-related notices we send are sent to that address. You can also find more info or ask questions in our support forum at http://groups.google.com/group/blogger-help.
Thanks,
Rick Klau
PM, Blogger
Google
-
Matthew 02/08/2009 5:26:00 PM
Yes they are and it annoys the hell out of me. I run a site deticated to making peoples lives better through financial education. http://www.autoincometoday.com
I had a hole heap of mp3 podcasts that where originals i made in mp3 format for education and i had to dump them due to google smashing my rank. All i could put it down to was mp3 on the site. So ive removed them and will try linking to an external host for them. But what a pain. Especially when they are original educational content
-
Marius van Dyk 02/08/2009 4:08:00 PM
Your own web site or Blog is always better than content created on free services or social networks because ...
1) You own the content, it's your web real estate.
2) You have control over the content, no one can just take it down, they have to ask you.
I don't think Google would take down posts with no reason though should this be true the way they did it seems bad style indeed.
Content creators should always get explicit written permission before they use content written by others. This is the only way to make sure you have a foot to stand on when things get legal.
Marius van Dyk
http://www.renegadeproducer.com/
-
Doityourself 02/08/2009 12:24:00 PM
The music industry has a major public relations problems. All those teens and single mothers they've been suing are music fans. All those bloggers posting mp3s are helping you promote your music. The industry is run by a bunch of bloated idiots.
I worked in the music industry for years. The game is over. Power has reverted back to the musicians. They just need to grab it. Anyone can contact me if they want to figure how exactly to do that.
http://thekrays.wordpress.com/2009/02/08/why-the-music-industry-sucks-and-google-too/
-
muruch 02/06/2009 9:28:00 PM
I can give you some insight...the majority of the claims I've been aware of (including my own) were filed by IFPI due to an EMI bot which targets any songs or artists under the EMI umbrella - this includes even artists signed to indie labels in the U.S. who grant permission to bloggers like myself to post their mp3s if EMI does handles their distribution in the UK.
I left Blogger after a four month battle with them over their deleting reviews from my 100% legal blog (I obtain authorization for every mp3 I post) Muruch due to erroneous claims from IFPI (see my own posts about it here & here as well as my comments on the Wire Tap article).
I was one of the few who successfully filed a counter claim with Blogger and had my posts reinstated. The process was frightening considering the threat of legal action even though I'd followed copyright laws. Not to mention that the prolonged battle (and subsequent transfer to a new domain) drastically reduced my traffic, which has resulted in a great loss of ad revenue. Thanks to Blogger, my almost decade old music site has been reset in rankings as if it were a new blog. And despite their acknowledgement that the claims against me were unjustified, it seems Blogger continues to censor blogs without verifying the claims they receive.
-
muruch 02/06/2009 9:25:00 PM
I can give you some insight...the majority of the claims I've been aware of (including my own) were filed by IFPI due to an EMI bot which targets any songs or artists under the EMI umbrella - this includes even artists signed to indie labels in the U.S. who grant permission to bloggers like myself to post their mp3s if EMI does handles their distribution in the UK.
I left Blogger after a four month battle with them over their deleting reviews from my 100% legal blog (I obtain authorization for every mp3 I post) Muruch due to erroneous claims from IFPI (see my own posts about it here & here as well as my comments on the Wire Tap article).
I was one of the few who successfully filed a counter claim with Blogger and had my posts reinstated. The process was frightening considering the threat of legal action even though I'd followed copyright laws. Not to mention that the prolonged battle (and subsequent transfer to a new domain) drastically reduced my traffic, which has resulted in a great loss of ad revenue. Thanks to Blogger, my almost decade old music site has been reset in rankings as if it were a new blog. And despite their acknowledgement that the claims against me were unjustified, it seems Blogger continues to censor blogs without verifying the claims they receive.
-
rich k. 02/06/2009 7:31:00 PM
Thanks for the column. I wrote about this at length in my free online music magazine Modern Acoustic in November... you can check it out at: http://modernacoustic.blogspot.com/2008/11/are-music-blogs-under-fire.html
-
rich k. 02/06/2009 7:30:00 PM
Thanks for the column. I wrote about this at length in my free online music magazine Modern Acoustic in November... you can check it out at: http://modernacoustic.blogspot.com/2008/11/are-music-blogs-under-fire.html
-
craig 02/06/2009 5:12:00 PM
I get your point about unfair takedowns and I've probably had a few too. but I can guarantee you that in your first example Earth Wind & Fire, Wilco, and The red Hot Chili Peppers didn't consent to having their music posted illegally. These bands don't need the help of a low traffic blogger hosted blog.
-
Jenny Lens 02/06/2009 1:05:00 PM
I've long told people to host their own blogs. Be aware that hosting at WordPress.org is not the same as hosting a WordPress blog on your own site. Get your own domain name and webhost and back up!
For less than $10/month, you can have total control over your blog. It's always a good idea to copy/paste blog entries into text files on your hard drive. It's a good idea to download backups on your hard drive.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has a link of webhosts who require a court order, not just a C & D, to remove posts or shut down accounts. Some only cost $25 a year! BE SURE you ask before you sign with a webhost.
Stop believing corporations will behave in any manner other than what suits them the most. Take more responsibility and protect your work too!
-
Jenny Lens 02/06/2009 12:54:00 PM
Clarification: The major news media who ran footage, which clearly stated the studio who created the footage (onscreen watermarks), never contacted her, never paid her. I advised her to seek legal counsel and demand payment.
It's the HYPOCRISY which quite literally kills us and our work. The major companies who are the first to send out C & D letters also routinely STEAL from artists, hoping they won't get caught. They do it again and again.
Most RARELY think to do their due diligence, figuring the chances of getting caught is slim. Too often, they do get away with it.
I know too many rock photographers who've told me stories, plus my own experiences.
Hypocrites. Liars. Delusional. As was stated, the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. They don't realize free marketing and publicity. When it comes to marketing, no one does it better than the fans and the creatives.
What year is this anyway? And people wonder why I haven't done more with my archive. Ask around, you'll hear the same story.
-
Jenny Lens 02/06/2009 12:44:00 PM
I wish this technology were available to ALL creators of content. I'd be a rich woman if everyone who posts my photos links to my site and if the people who deliberately steal them didn't waste my time constantly emailing NOCI (Notice of Claimed Infringement) and those who use my work FOR PROFIT asked first, and crossed my palm with silver. The people who use my photos for their benefit are robbing me of legitimate licensing and sales.
If big companies are doing this, what about all the many artists, photographers and film-makers whose work is being stolen? I just emailed someone about the fact her copyrighted footage was used by major online news media sources today because of an event in rock history.
If the big companies are going to police us, how about us being able to police them and the really dangerous stalkers who deliberately steal our work? You have no idea what some of us individual creatives deal with on a daily basis online.
Let's use technology to enforce copyright laws and stop the seriously disturbed online who harass artists. I'm quite appalled at the time many of us spend just to protect our work. If the technology exists, ISPs should let us all in on it, if we need it.
People simply don't pay attention to the fact it's the individual artists who are losing in this game, whether musicians, painters, photographers or film-makers. The irony of having so many tools for creativity and our credit, our payment is left behind. No artist left behind. I wish.
-
Jeff 02/05/2009 11:02:00 PM
Yes, from my findings, the take-downs only occurred on blogs hosted on Google's server. Though, it is possible that other takedowns may have happened on non-Blogger hosted sites.
-
Dunl 02/05/2009 9:42:00 PM
I assume the statement that "Each post takedown occurred on a blog hosted by the Google-owned Blogger platform" means only Blogger blogs hosted by Google/Blogger's Blogspot (on the blogspot.com domain), not Blogger-created/managed blogs hosted elsewhere? In other words, the deletions have to do (only?) with pages publicly viewable on Google's servers, and don't affect data stored privately on Google's servers in Blogger accounts that publish their content elsewhere. (?)
-
Michael Zeleny 02/05/2009 7:58:00 PM
The DMCA requires that the owner of content removed pursuant to a notification of alleged copyright violation filed under its provisions be promptly given an opportunity to contest it by submitting a counter-notification made under penalty of perjury in a United States court of law under the provisions set forth by 17 USC 512 (g)(3). There is no shortage of plaintiffs' lawyers yearning to certify a class action lawsuit against deep-pocketed defendants. If Google violates U.S. law, they will pay through the nose. If not, not.