-
alan jones 09/03/2010 4:20:00 AM
I worked for Stryker as his personal for over a year in that same office. What a train wreck he is. He spent the lions share of his day chain smoking , doing lines and taking bong hits. I spent most of my time answering endless calls from bill collectors pretending he wasn't in the office. He should have retired about 20 years ago... very pathetic and sad!
-
CrazyDiamond 10/22/2009 4:06:00 AM
"A couple hundred dollars," huh?
I understand that Mr. Kulak got quotes for soundproofing . . . and it would cost thousands.
If YOU can do it so cheaply, by all means offer your services.
-
yourname 10/11/2009 11:14:00 PM
er, I'd soundproof MY walls if it were THAT bad!
Having said that,
It is unconscionable that a music club would not make every effort to soundproof their walls and to be a good neighbor! Is Kulak really enjoying all this hassle so much he would rather spend hours in court and money on attorneys, than a couple hundred dollars making his wall quiet and getting back to his own business?
As an acoustician, I can tell you, the music/bar club bears a responsibility for the sound they generate. There a sound level meters that can tell you how many Sabin units are coming out of the club. As for ambient noise, that may hold water during the day, but, the street is not that noisy at night.
I would simply call the LAPD, EVERY SINGLE time the noise was too loud. It is their job to police and to enforce ordinances.
As for pissing on sidewalks, etc., a well placed video camera in a parked car for a week or two should provide plenty of evidence of anything that is going on outside the premises. IF it is really all that bad, the porn king should go this route, and prove his case and be done with it.
I cannot imagine either one enjoying all these hassles. The only thing I can think of is, being LA/Hollywood, they understand there is no such thing as "Bad P.R."! I am sure they both get extra customers from all this. Personally, I have no need for either of their services/products, and refuse to visit any of their websites to support them.
-
Okay, if I got a midnight visit from the "Jeff Stryker" persona, that'd be way cooool!!!
-
Robert ryan 06/07/2009 11:39:00 PM
Peytona.k.a. Jeff Stryker is a self hating closeted gay man-well past his shelf
life! He appeared a number of years ago in a gay themed play& refused to ride on the float on Gay Pride Day for fear his mother might find out he was gay!If
he's so good at lying to himself,is it any wonder that he has any trouble fabricating any story he pleases to the detriment of his neighbors? With any luck he'll lose his law suit and disappear under the rock he slithered from under!
-
Brian Monahan 04/21/2009 10:05:00 AM
The one thing about Chuck Peyton that may hasten his demise is the fact that he smokes cigarettes. Maybe we should all send him cartons of cigarettes and hope for the best!
-
Nancy 04/02/2009 12:10:00 AM
Peyton is clearing a good for nothing has-been. He is already balding, thinks he is the king of porn when really he is a pathetic manipulating person whose friends fall for his bullshit charm.
He uses everyone like a fucking leech and than dumps them like trash. I've been to the Woodshed and have witnessed the horrible actions of Mr. Peyton, such a fucking sick person. He needs to write his name in a mental institution because he is a very sick man.
I find it odd that I remember him having a teenage son but I haven't seen him since. Rumor has it now he has some other child, oh god. that poor child. Before he tries to raise hell on Kulak for no reason, he should try to raise his own newborn a legitamate way instead of trying to ruin someone elses life.
God have mercy on Peyton.
-
Crazy'Diamond2009 03/31/2009 7:41:00 PM
To the above I add:
While Mr. Peyton has gleefully and zealously acted as the public aggressor, who can really say who was the mastermind (cough! cough!) behind this fiasco? Whatever the truth of the matter, Mr. Britten freely put his reputation on the line. What has he received in return?
Do the very public and statements made by Mr. Peyton and Mr. Britten casting aspersions on Mr. Kulak's financial honesty constitute the legal definition of slander, if evidence reveals such statements (and other defamatory statements) to be untrue? If this proves to be the case, Mr. Kulak deserves no less than an apology - a protracted, public apology equal to the fervor and publicity with which the accusations were hurled.
Will he get it? No.
Why not? There is scant justice to be had for those without a bottomless pocketbook. Sadly, this is hardly a blip on the injustice radar.
-
CrazyDiamond2009 03/31/2009 7:40:00 PM
The following message was posted on Mayorsam�s blog entry of December 15, 2006:
Over two years have passed since this was originally posted, but passages of Mr. Britten's correspondence disturb me: phrases such as how Mr. Kulak 'realized moneymaking opportunities,' 'used every opportunity to hold fund raising events and attract bigger crowds,' and particularly ' musicians and patrons . . . have had the wool pulled over their eyes.'
Let's crunch a few numbers. I don't know what the Woodshed activities were in the past, but my experience, the 35-person audience limit has been strictly followed. Currently there are four nights a week where audiences are invited at a requested donation of $10, and two workshops supported by artists who are asked to donate $20 to participate (workshops are generally limited to about 10 artists per session, twice weekly).
Let's look at the theoretical maximum amount of revenue this can generate in one year:
Audience members = A
Workshop Participants = W
The Formula: [(A*10*4)+(W*20)]*52
So, if A=35 and W=20, the maximum amount per year that the Woodshed could gross from shows and workshops would be $93,600. Hey, not a bad haul, eh? Remember, however, this is the MAXIMUM THEORETICALLY POSSIBLE for shows. Read: NEVER GONNA HAPPEN. Granted, a certain number of donations (i.e. PayPal) and gifts are made, and there is also the matter of Mr. Kulak's outside video equipment rental service. I couldn't even hazard a guess at what these amounts might be.
However, I'm fairly certain that all of these amounts together would not equal Brittany Floor Covering's estimated annual sales of $450,000 per year. If it did, we're all in the wrong business. Never mind that doctor/lawyer stuff. Video equipment rental services and small acoustic venues are the paths to fortune!
According to Mr. Kulak's most recent newsletter, audience donations are down by one-third. Even assuming that workshops remain at a constant level, this means that the projected yearly intake for Woodshed activities falls to $68,640. Subtracting the monthly expenses as found at the Woodshed website ($5,278/month=$63,336/year), which would leave Mr. Kulak with a whopping $5,304 (plus other donations and his outside business). Remember, this is one-third less of MAXIMUM THEORETICAL LEVEL. Specifically, what Mr. Kulak stated was that donations were down one-third from LAST YEAR'S LEVEL - and THAT number I don't know, so the amount of $5,304 is probably a significant overestimate. (If the average falls to 20 persons/show, then yearly operating costs exceed donations made at the venue.)
Actually, the persons most qualified to comment on Mr. Kulak's finances are Mr. Britten and Mr. Peyton or, more accurately, their joint legal counsel. According to the L.A. Weekly article of January 2009, the Peyton/Britten lawsuit was poised for trial. From what I know about civil procedure, by this time a LOT of documentation has changed hands. No doubt Mr. Kulak's finances have been closely scrutinized. If the financial records do not reveal that Mr. Kulak has been hiding a fortune, then exactly WHO has had the "wool pulled over their eyes," Woodshed supporters or Mr. Britten?
One wonders whether any of the parties adverse to Mr. Kulak even bothered to employ the use of a simple calculator before filing their multimillion dollar lawsuit.
Speaking of the lawsuit, according to the draft complaint found on Mr. Peyton's website, other defendants in this case were to be the City of Los Angeles and (former) Councilwoman Wendy Greuel. Are they still defendants? How is this case progressing anyway?
Re: Mr. Britten's "parking problem": If you know customers are coming, reserve your own parking spaces, or perhaps park your trucks in the front of your store and let your patrons use your back parking spaces.
Re: Mr. Peyton's lack of ability to write a book: His multiple websites have already produced a lot of so-called reading material - available for free. Hasn't the public had enough . . .
-
CrazyDiamond2009 03/31/2009 7:37:00 PM
What exactly is the status of Mr. Peyton's purported advance for his biography which he claims he has been prevented from completing because of Woodshed activities? Was he required to return the advance? If not, then this publishing company may want to demand it back based on the following criteria:
1. How Mr. Peyton has been spending his time. I find it difficult to believe that it takes any less time and "concentration" to become an expert in website design (cough!), zoning laws and local politics and to stalk and harass various persons via email and blog comments (and who knows what else) than to compose one's own memoirs. After all, is he not already an expert of his own life? And yet he blames the Woodshed for HIS CHOICE of how he spent his time, energy and money. "Waah. Waah. I'm a victim." (This article points out Mr. Peyton's attitude of 'acceptance of this war without end.' As the aggressor, how easy it is to be resigned.)
2. Mr. Peyton's writing skills. After perusing his marginally comprehensive diatribes, a publisher might decide that his pathetic offal is unsalvageable even by the most talented ghostwriter, given the extensive revisions that would be necessary to render his ranting understandable, much less palatable. Through his websites, he has made his literary incompetence so glaringly public that any readable material credited to his authorship would likely be laughed off the shelves.
So, publishing-company-representative, please have your legal department review Mr. Peyton's contract and see whether there is any grounds for demanding monies back from Mr. Peyton - and additional monies, if there is an "Egregious Idiot" clause. I'll wait while you check . . . .
. . . No?
Darn.
-
CrazyDiamond2009 03/17/2009 5:44:00 AM
Well . . . the Brittany Floor covering website is back up and running.
There are no less than four links advertising the legal services of Mr. Peyton�s paramour and, inexplicably, links to a criminal defense attorney Ft. Lauderdale, Florida and a car repair shop in Springfield, Illinois. Over at least one of these sites floats an image of some short guy dressed up like Superman. Oh, and did I mention the link to some website named �Peyton�?
That�s right, make nice with the guy. It�s public record - easily found on the internet - that he has a nasty habit of turning on former associates.
-
CrazyDiamond2009 03/06/2009 1:03:00 AM
The figure in this conflict which remains distinctly mysterious is Mr. Jim Britten. Notably, the website for his company, Brittany Floor Coverings (www.brittanyfloors.com) is currently defunct, although it apparently was fairly extensive at one point. Its �History� section proudly proclaimed Mr. Britten�s commitment to the North Hollywood Community, having at one time served as a polling place. (This may still be true. I don�t know.)
The most notable public response that I could find regarding Kulak�s Woodshed from Mr. Britten is contained here: in Mayorsam's Blogspot of 12/15/06.
In it, Mr. Britten presents himself as a very reasonable business person who finds Peyton�s website �not in the best of taste.� However, he chose � and continues to choose � to turn a blind eye to Peyton�s underhanded and vicious tactics to ensure the continued legal persecution of the Woodshed, and especially Mr. Kulak personally. Also, nowhere does he indicate that he made the barest attempt to mitigate his own �parking problem� in any way - possibly by reserving parking spots for his late-night patrons HIMSELF - ?
What are Mr. Britten�s current thoughts on Peyton�s threats of violence, and even death, towards Mr. Kulak and persons connected with the Woodshed? What were his motives in the first place for becoming involved with such a person as Peyton? Does he believe that his silence will save his dignity? Or has he come to be too afraid?
-
CrazyDiamond2009 03/06/2009 1:02:00 AM
The figure in this conflict which remains distinctly mysterious is Mr. Jim Britten. Notably, the website for his company, Brittany Floor Coverings (www.brittanyfloors.com) is currently defunct, although it apparently was fairly extensive at one point. Its �History� section proudly proclaimed Mr. Britten�s commitment to the North Hollywood Community, having at one time served as a polling place. (This may still be true. I don�t know.)
The most notable public response that I could find regarding Kulak�s Woodshed from Mr. Britten is contained here: in Mayorsam's Blogspot of 12/15/06.
In it, Mr. Britten presents himself as a very reasonable business person who finds Peyton�s website �not in the best of taste.� However, he chose � and continues to choose � to turn a blind eye to Peyton�s underhanded and vicious tactics to ensure the continued legal persecution of the Woodshed, and especially Mr. Kulak personally. Also, nowhere does he indicate that he made the barest attempt to mitigate his own �parking problem� in any way - possibly by reserving parking spots for his late-night patrons HIMSELF - ?
What are Mr. Britten�s current thoughts on Peyton�s threats of violence, and even death, towards Mr. Kulak and persons connected with the Woodshed? What were his motives in the first place for becoming involved with such a person as Peyton? Does he believe that his silence will save his dignity? Or has he come to be too afraid?
-
stephen chandler 02/09/2009 9:15:00 PM
I have been to Kulak's. The allegations that it is Studio 54 type crowds is a pathetic attempt to paint this humble place with a broad and inaccurate brush.
Kulak's is a room that caters to the people that enjoy acoustic music. The 10 to 40 people that come on any given night seem to be quiet, mature people; respectful of property rights and neighbors.
There are no alcohol and no drugs being consumed on the sight as far as i can tell.
The first time I went there, a character wearing only sweat pants was kicking a life size martial arts dummy on the sidewalk. As I attempted to pass, he continued to leap into the air and kick the dummy and giving me threatening looks. I moved out into the street to avoid confronting this clearly disturbed person and got back onto the sidewalk when I was past him by ten feet.
This disturbed individual turns out to be the aggrieved neighbor. He scared my whole party. We haven't been back since.
I suspect he is clinically deranged.
Stephen Chandler
-
James 01/17/2009 5:37:00 AM
Jeff, hun, you 15 minutes of fame ended over decade ago. Let's be good and not embarrass ourselves, OK? Go home.
-
Mike Fey 01/17/2009 1:32:00 AM
I'd say fuck this jackass but it would be redundant...
-
allright337 01/16/2009 4:46:00 AM
i find it very amusing that because of the guys business next door - chuck peyton-ole chuck cant seem to get his autobiography finished.maybe he should finish his autobiography at the same place he did his website www.charlespeyton.com . never really had an opinion on jeff stryker/chuck peyton but the website shows a side of him that really isnt a very positive one. his creative juices were flowing when he did that website.what a mess!
-
Justin Tyme 01/15/2009 2:22:00 AM
I've performed at Kulaks many times a year since the first year it opened. Paul Kulak has created a little paradise for singer-songwriters and musicians, unlike any place in Los Angeles - and provides a free webcast so our friends and family around the world can watch, which they do. I made the BIG mistake of trying to reason with Stryker during one of my shows in which he was blasting his music. He got violent, screamed, and acted like a lunatic. This to a peaceful attempt. The man is sick. There's no question about it. At the hearing Kulak and his supporters stayed on track and were focused, while the lunatic Stryker went on endless tangents, revealing the fractured state of his mind. And it is true that Stryker contacted Kulaks performers online and threatened them - he wrote to us on Myspace - I was one of many who received threats and warnings. He seems capable to me of doing something truly terrible, worse than what he's done so far, and I would warn everyone to keep away from him - he's a time-bomb.
-
voodoo 01/15/2009 1:04:00 AM
What a waste of time, Peyton should get a life and Kulak should just move his club somewhere it can flourish.
-
Tina 01/14/2009 4:54:00 AM
Only in Los Angeles would anybody take offense at a quiet, family friendly place like Kulak's Woodshed. I've been there and everything said about Peyton instigating the harassment is true. I've heard his music booming through the walls while a little girl struggles to be heard. I've been there when the police came and shut the place down for no reason at all. I saw the smashed bathroom after the break in.
Peyton has proven to me that there is no such thing as justice in Los Angeles. I am amazed that the city still allows itself to be used as his personal goon squad.
What Paul has accomplished, and continues to accomplish, despite all of the attacks, is incredible. Imagine what he could do if he wasn't constantly attacked?
-
tiredoldpornstar 01/14/2009 3:33:00 AM
It's so obvious 'followthelaw' is actually Chuck Peyton aka Jeff Strkyer. Just look at the spelling and grammar errors, it's totally him. His sites look like his soul must feel, devoid of content, confusing and full of shit.
-
CrazyDiamond2009 01/13/2009 3:37:00 AM
Lily and Dana:
If my information is correct, Kulak and Peyton have separate landlords, each staunchly supportive of their respective tenants. Kulak's landlord is being sued right alongside him.
-
Lily and Dana 01/13/2009 2:20:00 AM
Where is the building's landlord involvement? Why doesn't the article discuss/interview the landlord? The landlord has rights too, and we're not speaking about just collecting rent. When neighbors like these do not get along, the property owner is often dragged into the dispute and expected to solve it. It's in the better interest of the state of the landlord's property and the longevity of good tenants for the landlord to help in some way. As two first year law students, we think if there are activities that violate the lease, the landlord needs to send letters asking tenants to stop the activities. The landlord may even have to serve an eviction notice to tenants who are causing harm to the property and possibly causing the loss of good tenants.
-
JP1954 01/13/2009 1:19:00 AM
Hey, "follow the law " aka Peyton, thanks for joining the comments!
-
CrazyDiamond2009 01/12/2009 8:00:00 PM
Let's see now . . . .
Four active websites . . . countless calls to police and other authorities . . . multimillion dollar lawsuit . . . playing his OWN music way louder than the Woodshed's (which I've personally witnessed frequently) . . . .
WHOSE fault is it this biography isn't getting written?
-
Nick Rodero 01/12/2009 12:15:00 PM
Peyton says he is the one being bullied by Woodshed's renovations, �with no other reason than to torture me.� !?! In colloquial speech, bullying often describes a form of harassment perpetrated by an abuser who possesses more physical and/or social power and dominance than the victim. None of these traits may be attributed to Kulak (who comes across as a rational human being) therefore, me thinks that Peyton instead suffers from serious long term emotional and behavioral problems brought on by his past profession, and not his current neighbor.
-
follow the law 01/11/2009 7:21:00 AM
sounds like a bunch of jealous haters on this comment board.How would you like it if the woodshed decided to move next door to YOU , in the quiet building you rented or purchased many years ago , so you could work in those same conditions.I rent a building in a quiet area because I ,too , work late into the night and need as little interuptions as possible.If they moved next to you in such a situation and disrupted your work environment (and was doing so in violation of the law) ,I doubt if any of you would not be in the same place.I would surely not stand by and let someone run over me.My solution to the problem would not take as long as this one and would not have to go thru any court proceedings ,just maybe an arson investigation.
-
fuckchuck 01/10/2009 8:37:00 PM
Jeff Stryker aka Chuck Peyton is a bold face liar. The reason all of this started was due to the fact that he had showed up at Kulaks Woodshed drunk and high on Vicodin many times and was asked politely not to come back in that state, so Chuck got pissed and decided to start a war with Paul. As far as noise levels are concerned, it's Chuck who plays his stereo with massive club speakers at full volume all the time. He claims that he's lost millions due to the crowds and noise from Kulaks Woodshed, which is another lie. The guy really doesn't have any money to speak of, due to the fact that his fans are getting less and less (what does he expect from a website that looks like it's straight out of 1996), and this is how he thinks he's going to make some money to survive. Nobody is interested in his action figure, his proposed reality series, or his 'book'......Chuck Peyton is a white trash hick from the midwest who just happen to be born with a big dick. That's it.
-
Dave 01/10/2009 8:20:00 AM
Peyton is one sick fugger in what he is doing to that club and its poor owner. And it's of little surprise. "Stryker" had no personality, whatsoever, in any of his films; just eight inches hanging in front of a consistently dumb, brainless affect - and he showed little skill in the use of that equipment to boot. It's not hard to project that such a talentless and intellectually vacuous twit would evidence such obvious psychotic and sociopathic behavior in the face of just how meaningless and pitiful his life has evolved.
-
Valley Gay Guy 01/10/2009 6:50:00 AM
Hell hath no fury like a scorned queen with a big package verses the valley redneck wannabe!
If this were a gay bar would things be different?
-
Crash 01/10/2009 5:01:00 AM
I first read about this dispute two years ago and decided to visit Kulak's to see what the hub-bub was all about. I have to say I started out with a reasonable amount of sympathy for Stryker/Peyton. I'm a writer also and have to have complete quiet to work. I thought "Well, he is paying rent and should have certain rights", but the night I went to check the place out, the locks on Kulak's doors had been super-glued shut. Right then and there I remember thinking this guy Stryker is an asshole and a coward. I found the people at Kulak's to be very nice, not at all rowdy or malicious. We were told to keep a respectful distance from the neighbor's store front. If you get points for civility, Kulak's would win hands down. Just read back on the comments Stryker makes and they reek of a self centeredness that borders on monomania. I was on your side, pal! Now I wish you'd stop imposing yourself on everybody and leave LA. I'm sick of what your ilk have done to my town. As for your book? I'll waste no time reading it.
-
Brett 01/09/2009 11:52:00 PM
Peyton sounds like a chigger. One of those annoying little bugs that attaches itself to a body and gnaws away at it. Hopefully, his efforts will be rebuffed, his suit will be lost, and he will crawl back into the black hole of relative anonymity from whence he came, and from which he can continue to market his adult products to the rapidly diminishing number of people who know who he is, or care.
-
Jim 01/09/2009 9:28:00 PM
Methinks the lady doth protest too much...Charles Peyton aka Jeff Stryker, who made a wad of dough going 'gay for pay', has got to be one of the most selfish individuals in that part of the Valley. This is truly a tempest in a teapot. And BTW, his "asset" is nowhere near 10"- maybe 8+.