Top

news

Stories

 

The 11 Percent Mayor Villaraigosa Lashes Back

Blasting L.A. Weekly, he says we relied on bad facts. Aides say he misspoke

OVER THE CHRISTMAS WEEKEND, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa came out against L.A. Weekly with guns blazing, claiming our September 11 feature story “wasn’t true.” It was the mayor’s first public repudiation of our investigation into his work schedule. Titled “The All About Me Mayor,” the article disclosed that Villaraigosa had only spent 11 percent of his time on nuts-and-bolts city business between May 21 and July 30. The mayor’s slam occurred during an interview with Rick Orlov, a veteran political reporter at the Los Angeles Daily News, who noted in his story that our piece “still rankles” the man who’s now up for re-election.

Villaraigosa also told Orlov, “They [L.A. Weekly] were upset because we only gave them my public calendar. They didn’t get to see what I was doing privately, with meetings here [at City Hall] or in other places.

“Everyone who knows me knows I work hard. That’s why both Sen. Clinton and Obama wanted me to campaign for them.”

Now the Mayor’s Office is backing down from some of those comments, with Villaraigosa spokesman Matt Szabo telling the Weekly that his boss “misspoke.”

The most alarming statement made by Villaraigosa is that the Mayor’s Office “only gave [the Weekly] my public calendar. They didn’t get to see what I was doing privately, with meetings here [at City Hall] or in other places.” Those words lead one to think that Villaraigosa has two work schedules — one for the public, and another that’s kept tucked away from any kind of scrutiny.

Szabo now says Villaraigosa got that wrong.

“On that specific issue,” Szabo says, “the mayor misspoke. We provided the Weekly with the mayor’s one and only calendar.”

Villaraigosa blacked out some of his schedule before giving it to the Weekly, with all the redacted areas described by Szabo as covering three categories of activity Villaraigosa did not have to disclose, in his opinion: security issues, personal and family time and fund-raising.

In response, the Weekly tracked down almost all of the blacked-out fund-raising hours independently. That left a fairly small amount of blacked-out time, which Szabo reconfirmed on December 29 was entirely taken up by personal time, family time, security issues and fund-raising.

Asked on December 29, three days after Villaraigosa slammed the Weekly, if the mayor’s schedule failed to include “private” meetings involving actual city business, as Villaraigosa claimed, Szabo says Villaraigosa is once again incorrect. “The mayor misspoke” to the Daily News, Szabo says. “Every official meeting was listed on his calendar.”

With Szabo, the Weekly went through Villaraigosa’s attack sentence by sentence. The spokesman continually pushed the line that Villaraigosa is the “hardest-working mayor in America.” But when asked if he could point to anything that “wasn’t true” in our piece, the spokesman said he didn’t want to go through our long September cover story “line by line.” Szabo then immediately threw out his standard spin: “Mayor Villaraigosa works harder and longer than any other big-city mayor in America, and everyone in Los Angeles knows it.”

Fred Siegel, professor of history at the Cooper Union for Science and Art in New York City, strongly disagrees. He is an authority on the key urban issues facing U.S. cities, and author of The Future Once Happened Here: New York, D.C., L.A. and the Fate of America’s Big Cities. Siegel says, “Villaraigosa is not someone who comes to mind when you think of the hardest-working mayors.”

Siegel describes Villaraigosa’s reputation as that of “ceremonial mayor,” and cites Richard Daley of Chicago, Thomas Menino of Boston and Cory Booker of Newark, New Jersey, as the hardest-working mayors in the country. “Booker lives at City Hall and works tirelessly on delivering city services,” says Siegel, “which is the nuts-and-bolts work of a mayor.”

Villaraigosa also told the Daily News that our feature story “didn’t go anywhere,” implying that the public was not outraged by “The All About Me Mayor” and that other news outlets did not pick up the piece. In fact, the story was widely disseminated and has become a regular point of discussion in opinion pieces about the mayor in other media and other cities.

Talk-radio hosts John and Ken on KFI 640 AM devoted 45 minutes to the piece, reading excerpts from it. Doug McIntyre on KABC 790 AM spent more than one segment ripping into the mayor and mentioning the Weekly story to his listeners. The Daily News and Los Angeles Times both blogged about our findings, as did several well-established watchdog and city-oriented blogs, including Mayor Sam (at mayorsam.blogspot.com), CityWatch (at citywatchla.com) and Fishbowl L.A. (at www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlla). Readers left more than 150 comments on the Weekly Web site about the article and its sidebar, “How Mayor Villaraigosa Spends His 16-hour Days.” Dozens of personal e-mails were sent to this writer, all of them appreciative of the Weekly’s work. Quite a few of those e-mails were extremely tough on Villaraigosa.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Per 02/22/2009 1:17:00 AM

    This mayor is a FAKE who won by default. He defrauded those that voted for him by presenting himself as someone he definitely is NOT! He is more concerned with the issues and support of illegal aliens than US/California citizens. I wouldn't vote for him as city janitor. WALTER MOORE will save this city with brains and professional commitment!

  • candorguy 01/19/2009 9:03:00 AM

    I'm surprise that the head honcho of Los Angeles, reads the LA Weekly. Save the animosity, Mr. mayor. The facts speak for itself. You lack the charisma that voters had hoped for; plain and simple! I kid you not. Working sixteen hours a day is more like quantity than quality. You possess the excellent effervescence of being a demagogue in front of the camera; which is a farce for the city. Your secrecy in politics is a persona non grata that we taxpayers have to support you and your entire habit of Machiavellianism! Enough is Enough! And you want to be governor--yeah right!

  • Phil Jennerjahn 01/12/2009 11:44:00 PM

    Los Angeles deserves better leadership and a better Mayor. http://www.philjennerjahn.com/ Make sure to vote against Antonio " I tripled your trash fees" Villaraigosa on March 3rd.

  • Ron Ketcham 01/10/2009 10:53:00 AM

    The LA weekly reporting is great investigative journalism. I wish all of our press took this skeptical approach to covering our politicians. We would be better off for it. Keep it up. Ron Ketcham

  • Alma Stent 01/10/2009 12:52:00 AM

    thanks A timely report I am waiting for the LATimes to be aaccurate . what upset me is how he repeatly circumvents the open discussion on public policy for example his attempt to take over the LA School board and his bypassing the open discussion of the DWP Board re solar roofing etc passiing it on to the City Council and ends as an initative in the next election By using these self serving actions sends messages to me He not interested in what I think or any other citzens he doesn't care about the cost of his action , the effect on other insitutions nor loss of interest by citzen effiencent public policy. He promotescitizen apathy by this bypassing actions that serves his interest and his friends interests Please open it up and lay it bare what damage he does to LA with poor policy

  • Janet 01/10/2009 12:10:00 AM

    No doubt the last poster is a Mayor staffer. No one in this city who is an active community member writes stuff like that on blogs. They dont' fool us. The fact is this Mayor is a clown. Yes, everyone knows it and I've heard there was a poll and his job performance numbers are in the low 20's. No matter how Szabo and his deputy mayors who are making over $100K from our tax dollars want to spin he's a joke. He has no accomplishments and police officers hate that he shows up at their new stations and intrudes on press confer. with the Chief Bratton as if he had anything to do with crime. Thankfully the media is starting to come out and report what we've known all these years, he's lazy, arrogant, sneaky, narcissitic and so much more.

  • Brett Hampton 01/09/2009 11:43:00 PM

    I'm surprised that our do-nothing Mayor's spokesman actually admitted that the Mayor misspoke. Villaraigosa is a politician, not a mayor. He can run for office, raise campaign funds, appear for photo opportunities, make sweeping proclamations (like his recent defense of Israel's "scorched earth" reaction to Hamas rockets, transparently designed to curry favor with Jewish voters and leaders), but what he does not do, what he cannot do, is lead. He cannot govern. He not only has displayed no talent or skill for it, he has, by his actions, demonstrated an aversion to even trying. And yet, this man will skip out on the people of Los Angeles next year to run for Governor, just like he skipped out on his Council District to run for Mayor. And what then? He's old enough to be President - will he skip out on the people of California to make a run for the White House? That would actually create an interesting scenario: While Bush ruined the country by making wrong decisions at nearly every turn over 8 years, Villaraigosa can accomplish the same thing by doing nothing - because he cannot lead. For those who believe that Villaraigosa's various out-of-state trips actually confer some kind of benefit on the City of Los Angeles, I put it to you: Where is your proof? Why does Villaraigosa have to go to Israel? What possible benefit is there to anyone in Los Angeles from that visit other than the Mayor itself when it comes time to solicit campaign money and votes from Angelenos who support Israel?

  • jeffrey kay 01/09/2009 9:38:00 PM

    Your article calls Mayor Sam "an established" blog and along with talk show screamers on KFI and that clown Doug McIntyre (who still can't tell the difference between city and county when it comes to immigration law or who's in charge of COUNTY jails and prisons like the one that let out Jamiel Shaw's killer, the illegal immigrant gangmember behind their cause, so they all falsely blame LAPD/ Bratton, how SO40 is worded and the city instead of the Sheriff's Dept.,/ County Supervisors and DA Steve Cooley's office). Mayor Sam doesn't even pretend to run anything but biased off-the-cuff "rumor and innuendo," often sliming and downright slandering its subjects, but because it believes like similar blogs that they're above accountability, function like a train wreck on the side of the road. Of course they're where the likes of your paper's ridiculously absurd hero zua dogg got their "rise," along with a number of recent ones that were so uninformed and vile that more civilized bloggers and former Mayor Sam "friends" like Joe Mailander of Street Hassle, dissociated in disgust. I point out the absurdity of using blogs like this and predictably right-wing AM talk show attention-hound screamers as the ones YOU use to "prove" your hit-piece on the Mayor "had legs" and "went somewhere." You can throw Ron Kaye into the mix, as an unrepentent Valley secessionist who was behind the original movement and still supports that idea, and actively opposes anything to do with the "rich westside" as he sees it, like the "subway to the sea." They're the local equivalents of Rush Limbaugh abd Ann Coulter. To point to these discredited, biased outlets as "proof" that you were right in a self-referential circle only proves how shallow you and Jill Stewart are in your claims. As for the validity of the underlying premise: when you admit that upto 1/4 of the Mayor's time involves travel around town (a big city, as you know, where getting from Getty House to the W. Valley can take over an hour or more, during which he's no doubt on his cell phone but that doesn't count as "Calendar time"); other travel includes hob-nobbing with national leaders who can help L A with money for federal projects LIKE matching funds for mass transit and infrastructure funds and general and good will, and is VITAL to a good leader. It doesn't include photo ops like showing up at crash scenes/ rallies, etc., wearing his "costumes" as critics deride them, but if he didn't, he'd be roundly held to the fire for that, etc. -- Just like if he didn't run around town trying to show support for different ethnic communities, but when he does, he's derided for playing to the votes and "wearing more costumes." All this just shows how biased and incorrect you are in what you write off as the 89% of time he's doing allegedly nothing at all, yet he IS busy doing things "for the city." No one's claiming that this Mayor is a policy wonk or detail man, but he has a lot of good people doing that, including Neighborhood rep. Dep. Mayor Frank, and a number of other top-notch Dep. Mayors and staffers. They've just put together a very solid team of financial and community leaders to lure business to the city and make it a more hospitable place for them, and to create jobs, even earning the approval of the business-oriented Business Journal. (But wait, then that makes him possibly too "pro-developer" and doing the bidding of business leaders like Broad and Riordan...) Unfortunately, it seems Matt Szabo wasn't very good at pointing out these inconsistencies, leaving the false impression that the original piece is valid. I'm not even a supporter of liberal politics when it comes to a city where it's the traditional middle class, not "minorities" who are the majority, who are actually under siege (the valid gripe that underlies and unifies the Mayor's critics), but too many of those involved in making decisions whether it's planning or where to build massively large and expensive new schools for LAUSD are still reacting to facts on the ground that may have been true, like, in the 590's-70's. But I can tell biased "reporting" when I see it, and your series against the Mayor and city under Jill Stewart, is it. And that's why I honestly believe it "isn't going anywhere" as far as the real opinion-makers in this town go.

  • M A Andrews 01/09/2009 6:57:00 PM

    The L.A. Weekly has replaced the failing biased marxist L.A. Times as the REAL newspaper of record for concerned legal citizens of Los Angeles ,a city that has been bankrupted by the present administration of clowns and race warriors!

  • Corey Lanum 01/09/2009 1:05:00 AM

    This kind of journalism is what's missing from major daily newspapers. I love it. Keep up the good work, LA Weekly!

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy