Top

film

Stories

 

I.O.U.S.A.: Market Scare

Don't put too much stock in this panic-inducing documentary

If scary myths are repeated enough, they start to be believed, which is why Wordplay director Patrick Creadon’s scary-seeming I.O.U.S.A. is likely to be taken as fact by a lot of people. Designed as a promotional film to boost a campaign being waged against federal debt by the Peter G. Peterson Foundation and the Concord Coalition, this is less a film than an argument — so much so that it’s hard to imagine many film critics, or audiences, without some knowledge of economic history being able to respond to it in any way except with sheer terror. Briefly, the argument goes like this: Deficits and debt are always bad, even immoral; therefore, the growing federal budget deficit, the national trade deficit and the nationwide failure to save money are ticking time bombs capable of destroying the country. The U.S., in the words of the film’s hero, former Comptroller General David Walker, is like Rome, collapsing from within from a toxic cocktail of unpaid debts, imbalanced trade, living beyond its means, and expanding government without a way to pay for it.

Walker is right only on the final point: Today’s federal budgets absurdly combine big programs with low taxes, which means inevitably that taxes must skyrocket or the federal budget must shrink. The film’s biggest boogie man is the Social Security meltdown — when the giant pool of retiring baby boomers cash in their chips, and the much smaller set of younger workers isn’t able to pay enough in, the system will break. But this is old news, as is the reality that Congress will have no choice but to reform Social Security sooner or later, along with those other big-ticket items, Medicare and Medicaid. The film’s biggest myth is that Americans don’t save, unlike, say, the Chinese. But Americans do save — a little in banks (like the Chinese), a lot in home equity and capital gains (like nowhere else in the world). So much so, as author Ken Fisher, one of the world’s most highly respected investors and stock market historians explains in his recent book, The Only Three Questions That Count, that Americans are actually the world’s best savers.

I.O.U.S.A. is stuffed with dazzling, spooky motion graphics and charts, one of which shows how our most disastrous president, Andrew Jackson, reduced federal debt to zero by the mid-1830s after the run-up caused by the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. The film celebrates this, when in fact Jackson’s actions busted the national bank, triggering the so-called Panic of 1837 and a six-year depression. History repeatedly shows that, defying conventional wisdom, balanced budgets and surpluses reliably produce recessions, stock market declines and worse. (The downturn during Clinton’s surpluses was reversed only by an extraordinary tech boom, which had nothing to do with fiscal policy.) Like companies, governments need debt to function properly, as any bondholder knows. Debt is not only not the evil Creadon’s film depicts it to be, it’s essential. Our current debts and deficits? No worries. One graphic that I.O.U.S.A. doesn’t include is a national balance sheet of our assets and liabilities, which would illustrate that the former is more than double the latter. We’re in the black, and a film this deep in the red isn’t something to be scared of at all — or taken seriously.


I.O.U.S.A.| Directed by PATRICK CREADON | Written by CREADON, CHRISTINE O’MALLEY and ADDISON WIGGIN, inspired by the book Empire of Debit by WILLIAM BONNER and WIGGIN | Produced by O’MALLEY, SARAH GIBSON and OPEN SKY ENTERTAINMENT | Released by Roadside Attractions | Sunset 5

 
  • Jeff 05/01/2009 6:59:00 PM

    Koehler, you are dumb beyond belief. Please swallow your K-tablet at once.

  • Michael Paszt 10/27/2008 8:40:00 AM

    Man... Koehler must feel pretty stupid now in light of what actually has happened in the States in recent weeks... I think he should revisit this review and apologize for being completely wrong...

  • Dave Whittaker 09/03/2008 9:25:00 AM

    I have to assume the Weekly's editor of the Film section chose to run Robert Koehler's idiotic screed - it certainly doesn't qualify as a what used to be known, however quaintly, as a "review" - just to see what kind of ruckus it might cause. To that end it has succeeded. But what a useless load of half-baked rubbish. Koehler writes like someone who read a populist economics book once upon a time, but without having the economic and financial education to parse his way through the bullshit. When a non-fiction film isn't well-made, a useful review tackles what doesn't work and why - it doesn't attack every single premise of the film in a high-pitched rant, which is pretty much all that's been accomplished here. I can't believe Koehler's editor at Variety would let him get away with this kind of show-boating. At least there his reviews are worth a shit (actually they're generally quite good).

  • Doug Sunshine 08/31/2008 2:15:00 PM

    I find this review extremely bizarre, not so much in that it contains assumptions and ideas that are incorrect even on the most elementary levels, but because it appears in a major publication. Well, perhaps I'm getting ahead of myself with the "major" part. Whoever assigned this review to Mr. Koehler, whose only qualification appears to be that he has read (and misunderstood) a book by Ken Fisher, should be fired on the spot. Just as Mark Twain said, "It ain't what you know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." Mr. Koehler, you are getting us in trouble.

  • Michael Hancock 08/26/2008 11:31:00 AM

    You are disingenuous at best and dangerous at your worst. The balance sheet" is by virtue of its name "balanced". The equity, which you forgot to mention, has been faithfully supplied by the Chinese, Japanese, and Saudis. The balance sheet only gives you a snapshot of the current state of affairs. The three additional parts to a financial statement gives a future snapshot. This movie refers to the future outlook; so please stick to what you know. I would go on but I feel it is unnecessary considering your lack of understanding about finance. Journalist, because you can write does not mean you understand everything.

  • mike 08/26/2008 12:58:00 AM

    "that Americans are actually the world's best savers." "a little in banks (like the Chinese), a lot in home equity and capital gains (like nowhere else in the world)." wahahahahahaaaa that's rich! you mean best borrowers. and what home equity? you mean that fantasy equity rapidly disappearing into vapor? i bet you're one of those guys that said there was no housing bubble either right? well not to worry. i am sure we are at the market bottom and the financial stocks are "cheap" now - the fed will save the day. nothing wrong here! stick to reviewing tropic thunder.

  • Michael Armstrong 08/26/2008 12:37:00 AM

    The Panic of 1837 had nothing to do with Jackson balancing the national debt--it was caused by the bursting of a bubble in rampant land speculation and massive expansion of credit by banks, not unlike the subprime mortgage meltdown we are seeing today. This article is entirely misleading, and its primary assertion that massive debt is key to a healthy economic is totally unsubstantiated and nonsensical.

  • grusilag 08/25/2008 10:35:00 PM

    "History repeatedly shows that, defying conventional wisdom, balanced budgets and surpluses reliably produce recessions, stock market declines and worse. (The downturn during Clinton's surpluses was reversed only by an extraordinary tech boom, which had nothing to do with fiscal policy.) Like companies, governments need debt to function properly, as any bondholder knows. Debt is not only not the evil Creadon's film depicts it to be, it's essential." In a sense, Koehler is right. Debt is essential in our system. As some of you may already know, 99% of our currency issues as debt (take a look at that dollar bill in your wallet - its a federal reserve note and like all notes from a bank, it represents debt). Paying down our debt, as Andrew Jackson did, would nearly destroy the money supply (Andrew Jackson did it at a time with the money supply was not tied to a central bank and therefore did not completely destroy the money supply). The problem of course is that if all currency issues as debt then the only way to pay it off is to go into further debt. The system relies on the continual creation of more debt. This works fine while individuals and the government feel like they are prospering but once the "bubble bursts" banks stop the lending and people stop borrowing and start paying off their loans. This is known as a recession and Koehler is right when he says that when the government and people start paying off their debt they create a recession (a contraction of the money supply). The solution is not to continue this system - it can only keep going if we all collectively and forever ignore our growing debt and continue to go further and further into debt. The solution is to revamp the way our currency issues - it needs to be interest free at its issuance and fractional reserve lending needs to be outlawed.

  • grusilag 08/25/2008 10:16:00 PM

    Thank you ejhickey for finding that cite. Ken Fisher has been immensely wrong on the economy these past two years. One thing that koehler gets right is that paying down the national debt would kill the national bank. Since 99% of our currency is issued as debt (just take a look at the dollar bill in your wallet - its a federal reserve note and like all notes from a bank, it represents debt) paying off the debt would essentially destroy the money supply. The solution, of course, is not to continue going into further debt to the national bank (or the central banks of other countries), but to reform the system so that we can have a debt free currency.

  • ejhickey 08/25/2008 8:53:00 AM

    Since this review's criticism of IOUSA relied in part on Ken Fisher's recent book. the following quote from Mr Fisher may be relevant. It is taken from an article by Mr. Fisher in Forbes in February 2007: "Housing Boom!!! "Don't buy it. For months now the debate has been over whether America will have a hard landing or soft landing, the answer hinging on how big 2007's housing disaster turns out to be. Well, there won't be any housing disaster. We won't have a landing at all, soft or hard. Right now the U.S. and global economies are both accelerating. You can see right through the housing crash story by looking at the prices of housing stocks. The market knows what the economic worrywarts do not, which is that the housing sector is already making a comeback. In the last six months housing stocks are up 24%, well ahead of the overall market. If housing were destined to fall apart in 2007 these stocks wouldn't be so strong now. Did you know that housing sales are up in the last few months, not down, and that inventories are lower than six months ago? We're accelerating, not landing." I wish I could think think of a witty comment about Mr. Fisher's optimistic prediction about the housing market, but the sadness I feel for many people caught in the housing downtown, makes humor seem inappropriate. Perhaps you should rethink your reliance on on his theories.

  • ejhickey 08/25/2008 8:25:00 AM

    In the last year the amount of federal debt has increased. So why have all the major stock market averages gone down into bear territory? And what are these alleged national assets that are double our national debt? I think you should post a response that is not merely a quote or rephrasing of Mr Fisher's theories about the relationship of debt. Finally , you have misquoted or misinterpreted Mr. Creadon's position on debt. He has never said that all debt was bad but that what is cause of concern is the amount of debt and our ability to repay it along with the costs of the debt.

  • Cornell University 08/24/2008 6:21:00 PM

    I thought the film was poor. It was not correctly constructed to make the case. It was so poor, in fact, that it did not even adequately dispel your odd notions of debt in the US and economics. We are in negative savings territory; claiming to the contrary does not make it so. Appreciation of assets denominated in dollars is not wealth creation; it's inflation. You've got my email. Contact me and I will send you some charts showing that we are indeed in uncharted territory. This film was written to be a commercial success. On this count, it will fail. Addison Wiggin is a capitalist (or opportunist) not a film maker. He will fail at both (unless this thing was so cheaply made that he can get in the black trivially.) What is so disturbing is that this may have been the best shot at drawing people's attention to the problem. They got access to big guns in the field. They blew it.

  • Julius Seizure 08/24/2008 11:57:00 AM

    Robert Koehler - you Sir are an idiot. Unfortunately you'll never learn until China and Japan call in their debt and the USA collapses.

  • Bryan 08/23/2008 7:04:00 AM

    "...balanced budgets and surpluses reliably produce recessions, stock market declines and worse." "Like companies, governments need debt to function properly, as any bondholder knows. Debt is not only not the evil Creadon's film depicts it to be, it's essential." Wow, just... wow. With "insights" like this, plus a bizarre, skewed interpretation of economics and history, I wonder if Mr. Koehler has applied for a job with the Federal Reserve or Treasury. Sounds like he would fit right in.

  • Andrew 08/22/2008 11:21:00 PM

    This is not old news. The national debt is going higher and higher. Our taxes right now go mainly to pay just the interest on our debt and not to pay for services. I don't about you but, when you get to the point when you can not make your payments on you car/home/credit cards you are bankrupt and the banks come and gets your stuff. What happens when we as a country can't pay our debts to other countries. They come collect their assets/our stuff. The government and individuals can not continue to spend money they don't have and expect the system to stay afloat. We are living in a debt based society created by the central bank called the FED. Creating money out of thin air and charging interest on it. We are loosing our equity in homes because the FED refuses to raise rates and STOP PRINTING MONEY. Printing money is making our savings worth less and less! I'm not sure the writer of the article even watched the movie. Get you head out of the sand.

  • Steve 08/22/2008 9:12:00 PM

    Yeah, you are a much bigger expert on the financial condition of the country than the former Comptroller General of the United States. Sorry, but I will take his word for it before yours any day of the week. I'm wondering if you even watched the film, because you didn't even mention that the real issue is rising health care costs and the baby boomer generation retiring en masse. Your rant about saving money was cute, though. Anyone who thinks consistently spending more than you make is fiscally sustainable is crazy, which is why this review is absurd.

 

Find A Film

for free stuff, film info & more!

Most Popular Stories

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons

Box Office

  1. Chronicle (2012/ I), 22.0 mil, 22.0 mil
  2. The Woman in Black, 20.9 mil, 20.9 mil
  3. The Grey, 9.3 mil, 34.6 mil
  4. Big Miracle, 7.8 mil, 7.8 mil
  5. Underworld: Awakening, 5.5 mil, 54.2 mil
  6. One for the Money, 5.2 mil, 19.6 mil
  7. Red Tails, 4.7 mil, 41.1 mil
  8. The Descendants, 4.6 mil, 65.5 mil
  9. Man on a Ledge, 4.4 mil, 14.6 mil
  10. Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, 3.8 mil, 26.7 mil
Movie Title, Weekly Earnings, Total Earnings

Trailers

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy