Top

news

Stories

 

Secure Borders? Try Fenced In

With $860 million spending sprees, high-tech surveillance towers that don't work and Operation Streamline show trials, it's still the same old catch-and-release game

Sasabe, Arizona — Under a cloudless desert sky in the bright sunlight of midmorning, we spotted the young Mexican man crouched in the scrub. He flagged us down, right on the main highway barely a mile north of the border.

Emilio Flores

"It took us about two minutes and we were over": A migrant's comment on the effectiveness of the U.S. government's new steel fence near Sasabe.
Emilio Flores
"It took us about two minutes and we were over": A migrant's comment on the effectiveness of the U.S. government's new steel fence near Sasabe.
In the dying fields: A cross for the migrants who didn't make it through the desert
Emilio Flores
In the dying fields: A cross for the migrants who didn't make it through the desert

(Click to enlarge)

"It took us about two minutes and we were over": A migrant's comment on the effectiveness of the U.S. government's new steel fence near Sasabe.

Emilio Flores

(Click to enlarge)

In the dying fields: A cross for the migrants who didn't make it through the desert

Emilio Flores

(Click to enlarge)

A prayer for the road: At the Catholic church in Altar, Mexico

I was riding with a couple of other reporters and two members of the Samaritans, a church-based group from Tucson, whose volunteer mission is to aid migrants stranded in the no man’s land of the Arizona-Sonoran desert. We were in the deadliest section of the border. Of the estimated 500 people who died trying to walk into America last year, about half perished here in Arizona. And more than three dozen right in the 30-mile stretch the Samaritans were patrolling that morning.

The dark-haired man furtively motioning to us no doubt spotted the Samaritans emblem on the side of our car. And when we pulled over to his side of the road, he silently and quickly led us through the greasewood and shrubs about 50 yards from where we started. There, resting on the rocks under a scrawny tree, were nine more of his weathered, tired fellow trekkers, including two young women — one of them pregnant.

“We were abandoned by our coyote,” the young man told us, referring to the smuggler who had taken more than $1,000 from each of them with the promise of getting them across the border.

“On our second night walking,” the young man said in Spanish typical of impoverished southern Mexico, “[the coyote] said he was going ahead to get us food. He never came back.”

The Samaritans, as they always do, offered to help the migrants seek medical aid or turn themselves in to the Border Patrol. This group hungrily tore into the high-energy snacks and bottled water carried by the Samaritans but, as is most often the case, declined the help and decided to venture on.

“We have no idea how we’re going to do it, and we have no money left,” said one of the other migrants. “But we have contacts in Phoenix and L.A. and we’re going to get there, God permitting.”

There’s nothing earthshaking about bumping into a clump of undocumented Mexican border crossers down in this part of the world. More than a thousand a day, almost half a million a year, continue to elude the personnel and machinery of an ever-beefier U.S. Border Patrol as they enter this zone immediately south of Tucson.

What was remarkable is that we ran into this particular group barely a two-minute drive from the just-constructed, 15-foot-high multimillion-dollar fence that is a showcase of the Bush administration’s vaunted Secure Border Initiative. The same wall that both parties in Congress have recently embraced as the answer to stemming illegal immigration. Moreover, the group we found — right off the main road leading from the official U.S. port of entry at Sasabe — was but a few clicks away from one of the nine highly touted prototype electronic-surveillance towers that the U.S. government paid the Boeing Company $20 million to build along a 28-mile run of the border.

In other words, the small group of migrants we spoke to had not only just jumped the newest section of the government’s physical fence, they had also dodged the high-tech “virtual fence,” loaded with the latest gadgets and software.

“We got over the fence with a rope,” said the migrant who had flagged us down. “It took about two minutes and we were over.”

I have no doubt that this man was telling the truth. In fact, the very same notion occurred to me a half-hour earlier, when our group of reporters was given a close-up look at the new 7-mile stretch of fence running through Sasabe. Instead of the rusting plates of corrugated and Swiss-cheesed Vietnam War–era steel that constitutes the older patches of the 300 miles of southern border wall, the new fencing is built of individual steel posts, about 6 inches in diameter, mounted about 8 inches apart. You can’t climb it. You can’t cut through it. But someone, for some reason, decided that near the top of these parallel posts there should run a horizontal crossbar. Not only does the bar reinforce the entire structure, it also provides the perfect device over which to loop a rope and defeat the barrier.

“Couldn’t you just throw a rope over that and tie it to itself?” pondered an Arizona-based reporter as we eyed the fence that morning.

Apparently so.

Two years after the unprecedented upsurge of immigrant-rights marches that rocked Los Angeles and several other American cities, after two failed attempts by the Senate to pass a comprehensive immigration-reform program, and with the country now knee-deep in a countercycle of stepped-up enforcement at an ever-mounting cost to taxpayers, the flow of undocumented migrants into the U.S. continues unabated. And the battery of big-ticket, high-profile policing solutions, now at the core of national immigration policy, seems to be failing.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next Page >>
 
  • Nick 07/12/2008 9:56:00 PM

    According to Marc Cooper, any effort to defend the border will fail - pure defeatism. Apparently he is fine with an Hispanic America, since 70% of Mexicans would rather live here, and I'm sure most of Latin America feels the same way. So we can have the same crime, corruption, and poverty that are endemic throughout Latin America. Nice future, Marc - hope you speak Spanish!

  • Lee Rogers 07/09/2008 7:01:00 PM

    This article is so incredibly one sided it actually comical. Sheriff "Joe" is a hero. The rest of the country did not care about illegal immigration until the border states started cracking down and the illegals shifted movement into the interior of the United States. Why no mention of terrorists using this corridor to enter the US? We need to tighted enforcement and the government is doing as much as the people will support.

  • mike 07/01/2008 9:12:00 AM

    the claim that "immigrant backlashes" occur during economic downturns is nonsense. the introduction of HR 4437 in 2006, and the political bubbling that brought it to the floor, occured during one of our biggest economic UPturns. why? because at the same time, one of the largest influxes of illegal aliens into the US occurred at the exact same time. why do you think dubya brought forth his "temporary" worker plan in january '04? chertoff is a bush lackey, and bush is an "open-borders" guy, just like mccain and obama. now onto the CRS report of operation gatekeeper. where you got your statistics, i have no idea. i can't find them anywhere. flipping through they're latest report, may 2008, it actually affirms that there WAS a decrease in apprehensions, and that the operation merely needs some improvements to be more effective.

  • lccat 06/19/2008 9:32:00 PM

    We also have 30,000 troops defending South Korea's National Borders that would be better utilized defending the United States National Borders! Then maybe members of the United States Military would be safe leaving their Children in the United States while they are out of the country defending OUR Nation without their Children being murdered by ILLEGALS and their Anchor Babies!

  • Chris 06/18/2008 4:20:00 AM

    MH writes of the "unreasonable restrictiveness of the US legal immigration system" as an essential cause of illegal immigration. On the contrary, the U.S. admits more legal immigrants, both in absolute numbers and relative to its own population, than any other country on the planet. The greatest number of *legal* immigrants each year already come from Mexico - many more than from any other country. Even though China and India each have populations that are over FIFTY times larger than Mexico's, yearly there are between two and three times as many legal immigrants from Mexico than from either China or India. Add on the huge numbers of illegal immigrants from Mexico, and you've got about a 100-fold overrepresenation of immigrants from Mexico. If there is any unreasonableness in the U.S. immigration system it is its massive skewing towards immigrants from Mexico.

  • No Border Wall 06/15/2008 2:27:00 AM

    Representative Duncan Hunter (R-CA) likes to brag about the wall that he built on the border. It took a decade and $39 million to build the first 9 miles of border wall south of San Diego, and its impact was minimal at best, but it made Rep. Hunter proud. In the weeks just before the 2006 mid-term elections, politicians desperate to look tough on national security and hang on to their seats jumped on Hunter�s bandwagon and rushed through the Secure Fence Act, which mandated �[at] least 2 layers of reinforced fencing, the installation of additional physical barriers, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors� along 700-plus miles of the U.S. - Mexico border. Though no walls would be built along the Canadian border and the coasts would likewise be unaffected, the Act�s pie-in-the-sky goal was �to achieve and maintain operational control over the entire international land and maritime borders of the United States." The politicians who voted for the Secure Fence Act were primarily interested in the symbolism of a wall, not its substance, otherwise they would have checked to see if the original San Diego border wall had worked. In fact, it hadn�t. The Congressional Research Service concluded that the border wall �did not have a discernible impact on the influx of unauthorized aliens coming across the border in San Diego.� Recent Border Patrol statistics bear this conclusion out. Fiscal year 2007 saw a 7% increase in illegal crossings in the San Diego sector. In contrast, during the same year crossings border-wide dropped by 20%. The Del Rio sector, which like the rest of Texas east of El Paso has never had a wall, saw a 46% drop. The unwalled Rio Grande Valley saw a 34% drop, bringing illegal entries in that sector to a 15 year low. Even Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff recognized the border wall�s ineffectiveness, saying, �I think the fence has come to assume a certain kind of symbolic significance which should not obscure the fact that it is a much more complicated problem than putting up a fence which someone can climb over with a ladder or tunnel under with a shovel.� Politics is a game that exists outside of the real world. In the real world the border wall is an expensive failure, but it sure looks great behind the candidate in a campaign ad. If demolished homes and bulldozed wildlife refuges clash with the rhetoric of protecting the homeland, they are simply ignored. When the Border Patrol says it only takes 5 minutes to get past the border wall, Representative Jones calls it �a foolproof barrier on the border.� While the General Accounting Office says that the wall has caused the number of crossers who die in the desert to double, Representative Hunter says �the fence works� in his ads. Reality is irrelevant. The only real-world consequences that matter to Hunter, DeMint, and Jones are campaign contributions in their pockets and votes in the next election.

  • Tina 06/14/2008 5:19:00 AM

    Excellent article... thank you!

  • who's profits 06/13/2008 9:02:00 PM

    Not many of the "anti-illegal" groups stop to ask who is profiting from all of this militarization in our country. For all their tough talk, they don't seem to care if the thing actually works. We need real solutions, comprehensive solutions. Until we find the courage to tackle the root causes of migration, the visa gridlock, the shadow-labor in our economy, we are doomed to repeat history. And unfortunately, that also means the anti-immigrant backlash that accompanies each new hiccup in our economy. Well, Lou Dobbs is having fun, so I guess that makes one of us.

  • MH 06/13/2008 5:28:00 PM

    Thank you, Marc Cooper, for a good piece of research and a clear article. We need more like it! It is increasingly clear that "enforcement" is backfiring. It will continue to do so until the root causes of unauthorized migration have been addressed. These include the incoherence and unreasonable restrictiveness of the US legal immigration system, instability and inequality in the sending countries (often promoted by US interests!), and the dumbing-down of our internal political conversation in the US.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy