Top

news

Stories

 

Another Toxic School? Virgil Expansion Planned on Contaminated Land

First Belmont. Now "Greens," sticking East Hollywood kids with a troubled site

LAST WEEK, THE L.A. BOARD OF EDUCATION approved the first step toward building an $85 million elementary school for 800 children in East Hollywood, to be erected on the three-acre playing field of Virgil Middle School. Just off Vermont Avenue, it will open in 2012, accepting kids from five severely crowded, woefully underperforming schools.

Under the deal, the middle school will get a new, three-acre field on nearby land that’s now a hodgepodge — a gravel parking lot for teachers, a tow-truck operation and a food-processing plant.

So what’s not to love? Say critics: more than six decades of chemical-laden industrial operations — companies with names like Chemicals Limited — and the toxic contamination they left.

Since at least 1920, the land beneath Virgil Middle School’s cracked-asphalt athletic fields and its teachers’ parking lot were used for gas stations, machine and steel-cutting shops, extremely hazardous metal-plating, oil-drum and paint-tank storage — and more.

From 1998 to 2007, while overcrowded L.A. Unified School District was on a desperate search for school sites, district officials repeatedly considered, studied — and promptly shelved — ideas for cobbling together those properties for a new school. (In 1997 they approved the disastrous Belmont Learning Complex near downtown atop a toxic oil patch, which finally opens this fall under the name Vista Hermosa.)

Now, with the district admitting it must spend at least $10 million to clean up the Virgil parcels, LAUSD is in damage-control mode. Thomas Watson, of the district’s Environmental Health and Safety office, denied to theWeeklythat land around Virgil was ever rejected because of its documented toxic history, then adds, “as far as I know.”

In sharp contrast to Watson’s recollections, a former senior administrator who worked for at least two superintendents in the 1990s tells the Weekly: “That’s absolute bullshit. We used to use [that site] as the one to ‘throw away.’”

By that, he means that in response to pressure from the state of California to propose land for new schools, the foot-dragging LAUSD padded its list with unrealistic properties. “We always put that one on [the list], because we knew it wouldn’t pass muster,” he says. “It was probably the most toxic site they ever looked at.”

Under the teacher’s parking lot, the district found ground water contaminated with gas, solvents and volatile organic and chlorinated hydrogen compounds, and removed more than 3,000 pounds of petro-hydrocarbons from the soil.

Today, Virgil Middle School principal Eva Snethen Stevens can’t believe the district is proposing this oft-rejected land for a school, not only because of past toxic problems but also because the plan abandons any pretense of pursuing “small schools,” and forces little kids to share a campus with teens — including gangs. Four Virgil students were shot and killed this school year.

“When this was first raised about Virgil, honestly, I laughed,” Stevens says. “I thought, ‘That is just insane.’... I’ve been with L.A. Unified for 30 years. I’ve seen a lot of things happen. This is the most preposterous thing I’ve ever heard of!”

Strangely, Virgil can thank a group of politically connected, self-proclaimed enviros for the school board’s controversial decision. Until this January, the district seemed intent on buying and tearing down two businesses, three houses and 32 old apartment units across West 1st Street from Virgil Middle School for its grade school. The West 1stStreet land is also contaminated but does not have nearly the history of chemical usage as the Virgil school land.

But that’s where Lois Arkin, the maven of the “Eco-Village” movement, lives. A loosely organized group of aging hippies, the small movement eschews cars and touts green living — and has long lived in some of the housing that was to be targeted by LAUSD bulldozers.

So Arkin raised hell, winning support from Board of Education President Monica Garcia and L.A. City Council President Eric Garcetti. Arkin and other Eco-Villagers suggested the outlines of the new plan, shifting the school from the relatively clean land the Eco-Villagers live on to the land with the much more toxic history. The school board a few days ago voted for the path of least resistance.

Now, the apartments and three other homes will remain, while land next door occupied by an LAUSD building will become the new “state-of-the-art” parking lot for the teachers. The more controversial land will become a school.

If it really comes to pass, Virgil teacher Lissa Alfred will go from working on one field with a history of contamination to another, and she’s not happy about it.

A P.E. teacher since 1991, Alfred has spent more time on Virgil’s athletic field than almost anyone, and in 2003 she got breast cancer. It doesn’t run in her family, yet she can’t prove that working on the site of former chemical companies and gas stations caused it. Now, she says, “I do not want to have to work at a toxic wasteland for the rest of my career.”

 
  • Mike Meuser 09/24/2009 2:35:00 AM

    Thought these interactive maps of toxic and schools would be interesting: Toxic Chemical Pollution, Children and Schools in the U.S. http://www.mapcruzin.com/toxicrisk/index.htm ToxicRisk.com is a Google Maps based mashup project that uses the latest EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) data, released March 19,2009, and schools in the U.S. Links are provided to RTK Net for detailed chemical pollution release data and Scorecard for chemical information. As you zoom in you will see a change in the icons of the facilities near the center of the map - these are the ones that you can click on and find the facility name, number of schools within 1 mile and number of schools within 5 miles of the facility plus a link to a database about the toxic history of the facility. You can also click on a chemical to learn more about associated risks. The schools will appear as you zoom in. As you zoom in further, you will see the school icon change - at that point you can click on the school to view its name. Click here for a graphical mini-tutorial. If you have any questions, suggestions or comments, please email me. I'd love to hear from you. Michael Meuser and Aran Deltac, co-developers of ToxicRisk.com, have been doing interactive pollution mapping since the early 1990s. Their Santa Cruz Toxic Release Inventory was the first U.S. based interactive toxic chemical facility mapping project on the internet. It was son followed with their work on the mapping interface for the launch of Environmental Defense Fund's Scorecard Project. Michael works fulltime developing content for http://www.MapCruzin.com and doing Community GIS projects. Aran is programming team leader for a major internet development company.

  • anonoymous typer that hates th 05/30/2008 10:05:00 PM

    Don't blame the people who don't want to lose their homes or businesses; eminent domain is highly controversial and no one likes it, whether for schools or highways. Especially since LAUSD has shown poor judgement about tearing things down instead of looking a little harder. But there's a general issue of waste here: a number of schools being build on toxic sites, in areas of declining enrollment where they're not wanted (Garcetti himself turned down one proposed school), and now they're building a gigantic boondoggle downtown, at $250 million estimated cost (which will double, mark my words) right next to the Cathedral downtown, which looks like Disney Hall. But they refuse to give any space to charters, which prove they can outperform public schools on less space -- but are entitled by law to use public facilities, incl. the sports facilities built by their tax dollars, too. Bricks and mortar alone don't a good school make, nor do the clowns who run LAUSD or the UTLA. Blame THEM, not the people across the street. Posted on Monday, May 5, at 12:30 am by jane The Los Angeles Board of Education seems to be lacking common sense when it comes to building schools on contaminated property. Remember the Belmont fiasco? Disaster after disaster, it doesn't seem to bother school board members of all the chicanery and demagoguery that goes on. And as a result; the Virgil fiasco is being brewed at the expense of the taxpayer. Is this the miracles of education you want? I hope not! Those who the run the second largest school district have no concept of what public empathy is, nor do they care! But then again, corruption is necessary for a government to function. And in this case, it's no exception. Posted on Saturday, May 24, at 10:08 pm by candorguy In the absence of legislation to protect children and school staff from toxic siting, this is to be expected from uncaring school officials - who are far too concerned with money and not with health or children. Parents should be shocked to learn that this type of action can lead to future early deaths and/or severe chronic illnesses of numerous people innocently attending or forced to attend toxic schools. In my opinion, it constitutes a type of legal genocide. Where the heck is the state in protecting its citizens from chemical and biological threats in our schools? Sick schools produce sick citizens. How hard is that to prevent? Did you know that LAUSD has been lauded as one building green? Visit www.schoolmoldhelp.org for extensive information on sick schools. We are not protected, at all, from chemicals and mold in schools buildings, in CA

  • Cheyan, Bucken 05/30/2008 9:15:00 PM

    http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/another-toxic-school-virgil-expansion-planned-on-contaminated-land/18795/

  • No State Legislation 05/30/2008 6:13:00 PM

    In the absence of legislation to protect children and school staff from toxic siting, this is to be expected from uncaring school officials - who are far too concerned with money and not with health or children. Parents should be shocked to learn that this type of action can lead to future early deaths and/or severe chronic illnesses of numerous people innocently attending or forced to attend toxic schools. In my opinion, it constitutes a type of legal genocide. Where the heck is the state in protecting its citizens from chemical and biological threats in our schools? Sick schools produce sick citizens. How hard is that to prevent? Did you know that LAUSD has been lauded as one building green? Visit www.schoolmoldhelp.org for extensive information on sick schools. We are not protected, at all, from chemicals and mold in schools buildings, in CA.

  • candorguy 05/25/2008 8:08:00 AM

    The Los Angeles Board of Education seems to be lacking common sense when it comes to building schools on contaminated property. Remember the Belmont fiasco? Disaster after disaster, it doesn't seem to bother school board members of all the chicanery and demagoguery that goes on. And as a result; the Virgil fiasco is being brewed at the expense of the taxpayer. Is this the miracles of education you want? I hope not! Those who the run the second largest school district have no concept of what public empathy is, nor do they care! But then again, corruption is necessary for a government to function. And in this case, it's no exception.

  • jane 05/05/2008 10:30:00 AM

    Don't blame the people who don't want to lose their homes or businesses; eminent domain is highly controversial and no one likes it, whether for schools or highways. Especially since LAUSD has shown poor judgement about tearing things down instead of looking a little harder. But there's a general issue of waste here: a number of schools being build on toxic sites, in areas of declining enrollment where they're not wanted (Garcetti himself turned down one proposed school), and now they're building a gigantic boondoggle downtown, at $250 million estimated cost (which will double, mark my words) right next to the Cathedral downtown, which looks like Disney Hall. But they refuse to give any space to charters, which prove they can outperform public schools on less space -- but are entitled by law to use public facilities, incl. the sports facilities built by their tax dollars, too. Bricks and mortar alone don't a good school make, nor do the clowns who run LAUSD or the UTLA. Blame THEM, not the people across the street.

  • reggie 05/01/2008 10:10:00 PM

    Does the Board of Education ever confer with Virgil's faculty about such decisions? Doesn't seem like it.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy