Top

news

Stories

 

Singleton's "Small-Town L.A." Papers Nosedive

Suburban coverage hit hard as the Press-Telegram, Daily News, Daily Bulletin, others, falter

THEIR FACES SHADOWED IN THE GLOW of a bar’s low-watt lanterns, several figures huddle at a corner table, radiating an air that is two pours depression with a splash of 120-proof defiance. Smoking cigarettes and using the hushed tones of clandestine conversation, some glance over their shoulders, evoking a scene from the Paris underground, circa 1942.

(Click to enlarge)

There is talk of subterfuge, backstabbing and betrayal, flashes of righteous anger followed by a weary sense of fatalism.

Yet it’s not a wartime City of Light but Los Angeles, 2008, and the resistance guerrillas at the table are journalists from media mogul Dean Singleton’s chain of regional daily newspapers that stretch from San Bernardino to the shorelines of Manhattan Beach and Long Beach to the San Fernando Valley.

Life for reporters, photographers and editors in Singleton-occupied newsrooms throughout Southern California has grown increasingly dark over the past several weeks, with successive layoffs and firings that have hollowed out several hometown newspapers.

The Press-Telegram in Long Beach has been stripped of its managing editor, publisher and copy desk, leaving little more than a large bureau to cover a dynamic port city of half a million people. The move came as the paper’s corporate owner continued his pattern of merging news operations, this time dissolving the Press-Telegram into the Daily Breeze in Torrance. *

“They’re way past stripping the paper to the bone,” says Joe Segura, a 34-year veteran of the Long Beach newsroom. “They’re digging for marrow now.”

Segura, who is also the shop steward for the Southern California Media Guild, calls the recent cuts at the Press-Telegram a continuation of Singleton’s effort to emasculate the union at his newspapers.

“Most unions go for bucks and benefits when they are at the bargaining table,” Segura says. “Last year, when we sat down to try and negotiate a contract, we were just trying to stabilize the newsroom. Over the past 10 years that Singleton has owned us, there has been constant erosion in newsroom jobs.”

That erosion has taken a newsroom that once had more than 70 journalists, Segura says, down to 12 news reporters today.

The grisly job-letting makes real the warnings of critics of El Dino — as the Texas publisher is sometimes derisively known — which have circulated ever since he started buying newspapers in Southern California almost a decade ago, from the Daily News and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune to the Daily Bulletin in the Pomona Valley, all the way east to The Sun in San Bernardino.

With job security plummeting faster than paid circulation, newsroom fratricide has made an ominous appearance. Staff photographer Walt Weis, a 26-year veteran of the Daily Bulletin, was summarily fired on February 29 by editor Frank Pine for allegedly freelancing video footage to a television-network affiliate — ostensibly a competitor. Pine, in an e-mail to the Weekly, declined to comment, citing it as a personnel matter.

After three decades as an award-winning photographer for the Ontario-based newspaper, Weis was making an annual salary of just $46,000. That pittance from Singleton — whose Denver-based company MediaNews saw its net income rise 34 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007 — actually made Weis one of the highest-paid employees in that newsroom. *

To put Weis’ salary arc in perspective: A first-year administrative assistant for the tiny city of Sierra Madre can make $42,000 annually with a sterling benefits package.

But in Singleton’s anemic newsrooms, Weis says, a photographer’s salary was seen as largess, and it made him a target. He said another employee, in a gambit to save his own job from getting slashed in the looming layoffs, told management that Weis was freelancing.

“It gave Pine an excuse to fire me, save more money and look good to corporate. And it got [the employee] a pat on the head,” Weis says. “How does he sleep with himself? He’s probably rationalized it as ‘every man for himself.’ ”

Other Daily Bulletin employees, who spoke on the condition that they not be identified by name out of fear of retaliation by the paper’s management, say the waves of layoffs have left remaining staffers in bitter despair.

“It’s really, really bad right now,” one said. “They pay us the equivalent of In-n-Out cooks, literally. They gut the newsroom, firing some of the best people we’ve got, and then turn around and expect us to be passionately motivated about our jobs.”

Singleton did not return calls for comment from the Weekly, but in 2003 the unrepentant media baron told the Columbia Journalism Review, “I was at the same place they were. I started at small papers and went up the ladder as I got experience.”


WHEN SINGLETON BOUGHT a controlling interest in the Bulletin in 1997, it was part of a blitzkrieg that before long led him to own every daily in the region, outside of the Times, the Register in Orange County and the Press Enterprise in Riverside. The Times became part of that story when it was revealed that its then–parent company, Times-Mirror, had helped to finance Singleton’s purchase of the Daily News, arguably in order to prevent a serious journalistic competitor from moving into town to challenge it.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • langobserved 06/01/2008 1:38:00 AM

    Ms. Vicente Robaina: I was going to give you the last word but I have to correct something else you said. I never suggested, nor do I believe, Walter Weis or Mark Cromer intentionally hurt the models they work with. I also don't believe W. Dean Singleton intentionally hurts his employees. They are all simply trying to make money. Sometimes the economic conditions are such that this works out for everybody, workers and owners and managers all. And sometimes, like now as the venerable tradition of reporting, packaging and delivering news changes radically, it doesn't. I also never speculated about Weis' character. Like I said, he might be a total sweetheart to his friends and family, just as Cromer and Singleton himself may be. But if a person is involved in a pretty exploitive business where the workers are stigmatized and lack every variety of basic worker protection, such as health benefits and job security, slamming a cost-cutting CEO for treating his workers in a less than enlightened way lacks a certain credibility. If you'll allow me a comparison, we all might be a little stunned if Singleton, say, were to criticize some other news organization for being short-sighted, lacking in values and driven by forces of reaction and fear. That would be a little hypocritical, and you can be sure we would hold Dean's feet to the flame on it. That's why we'll probably never see in the pages of a Singleton paper a decent series on the disappearing tradition of daily newspapering. In my small way, I'm just trying to ensure a little disclosure here by holding Cromer's feet - and by extension the feet of editors at LA Weekly (who, as arbiters of ultra hipness, seem to have an inordinate regard for the porn industry in general) - to that same fire. Now I really am done. Good luck to all.

  • Holly Vicente Robaina 05/29/2008 10:23:00 AM

    Langobserved: "The bottom line is he is a business partner of the writer." I think your good argument is right there. That relationship shows there�s potential for bias in the story. Still, I�m sure you�d agree it would be extremely difficult to find a news outlet that 1) was affected enough by the issue to cover it, and 2) had someone on staff who could offer a truly opinion-free view. With those two conditions, I certainly couldn�t write it, nor could you. Since there are likely no unbiased outlets for this story, I think it�s fine for Mark Cromer to offer a piece, as long as he has the best intentions for journalistic integrity. You don�t believe he does�and that�s a valid argument for you to make. I take issue with your comments about Walter�s personal activities because you are making a direct correlation between what he does, in his spare time, with his character. Is pornography bad? My personal opinion is yes, the product is. Is every porn model an exploited individual? Probably not. (Admittedly, I haven�t done any research on porn industry workers, so my thoughts are based on conjecture. How �bout you?) Do I like Walter�s freelance work? I really don�t. But I also don�t believe, as you suggested, that he intentionally hurts the models he�s worked with. I can�t say for certain; neither can you or anyone but the models themselves. Still, it would be out of character for what I know of Walter. I witnessed his kindness, compassion, and professionalism at the Daily Bulletin. I know him to be a self-sacrificing, loyal person. Point is, you don�t need to speculate about Walter�s character (and you said yourself his freelance work is �incidental�)�you already had a worthy argument about the validity of the article. If there is potential for bias due to the relationship between the writer and the interviewee, it should be recognized. But, unless you have firsthand experience with Walter�s extracurricular activities, your analysis of this�and thus, his character�weakens your argument. Makes you look like a defensive meanie.

  • langobserved 05/22/2008 8:55:00 PM

    Ms. Vicente Robaina: Good grief. Where do I start? Let me say first that you seem like a good friend and a sincere person and those are good things to be. So I acknowledge that. But I need to correct your interpretations here. To disagree with somebody is not evidence that you don't like them, or that you disrespect them. And to use rhetorical techniques is not necessarily to hide behind them. To quote Tom Hanks in Splash, don't they have sarcasm where you are from? For example, this in the Liberal OC blog today regarding Ann Coulter: "Yes, that�s right. She�ll be at UCI tomorrow to reassure all the right-wing young�uns that they really are �smarter than those stupid lib�ruls�. Now, I don't think the blogger offended, intentionally or otherwise, liberals by calling them "stupid libruls." He or she meant to disparage that usage not endorse it. Very simple, right? Let's put that behind us and pick up on Mr. Walter Weis. He might be a sweetheart, he might be a good father, loyal husband, volunteer at his church whatever. The bottom line is he is a business partner of the writer. If Cromer told his editors that he was quoting a business partner, fine. That's better. It would be even better to make their relationship clear. That they are pornographers is mostly incidental to the point, except that you tend to forfeit your right to criticize others for exploitive behavior when you engage in it yourself. Here's some questions for Weis and Mr. Cromer. Do they make sure their workers in Jail Babes got health benefits? Do they pay mileage? Time off? Child care? Or do they just pay the performers their 200 bucks or whatever and not worry whether they have sick kids and are trying to get a degree, have a worsening drug problem, are getting thrown out by their husbands. I don't wish to endorse the stigma that pornography suffers from. It is an exploitive business, possibly less exploitive than many others like picking strawberries or cleaning cars but you get my point. Now, you say I criticize you for asking too much. Not at all. My experience has been that young reporters don't ask for enough, they are much too happy to be recognized for their good work, to get that pat on the back or that Donrey pen that you reference, to be thinking about how they need some protection from arrogant management or changes in the market. So no, ask for more, much more. As Sam Gompers said �What does labor want? We want more schoolhouses and less jails; more books and less arsenals; more learning and less vice; more leisure and less greed; more justice and less revenge; in fact, more of the opportunities to cultivate our better natures." And let me wind this up by saying that your interpretation of heroism is vastly inflated in my opinion. It takes courage to do what Walter Weis did sure, maybe, some. It would take more to confront bad management in the workplace and it would even more to win a union organizing drive. Not every disgruntled employee who gets laid off is a hero. You know, if you want me to admit that Dean Singleton is a bottom feeder I will. But what does that say about the papers that are willing to sell out to him? One more quote from our friend Mr. Gompers: �The worst crime against working people is a company which fails to operate at a profit." That's all I'll say. You don't have to wait a month to reply. I'm not going to reply again. (I only knew you'd posted because I'd actually overheard people talking about it.) You have the last word.

  • Holly Vicente Robaina 05/13/2008 7:24:00 AM

    Langobserved: It's cool that you like to write, but being an effective journalist is about a lot more than stringing words together. (You can do that as an individual; you don�t need to be part of a news team.) It requires a passion for helping others tell their stories. And that means you've got to enjoy interacting with people--like �em, even. Meaning: You shouldn�t insult your co-workers and your audience (in your words, those �younger, more conservative reporters� who demand too much, and those �dumb union hacks�), and then hide behind sarcasm/irony. I caught your meaning the first time, loud and clear, but I don�t think you�re receiving mine. (I�m quite sure you �get it,� but you likely are rejecting it.) Your newspaper�s target audience surely contains plenty of working class people; it�s unwise to use language that insults your customers. (That�s like calling your next-door neighbor a buffoon, and then explaining you only said it to point out the foolishness of the neighbor who lives across the way.) And I�m well-acquainted with many of the hard-working journalists who are being discussed here, both ones who�ve been let go and those who are still tirelessly churning out the news. They�re not slackers or crybabies; they�re workers who have to ask for justice themselves (in the form of raises, fair treatment, or even a sound-off in an L.A. Weekly article) because they don�t have a union rep to stand up for them. They never made much money, so they can�t afford a lawyer to sue for wrongful dismissal. In fact, the only wrong and ignoble thing these former LANG workers could have done was to accept the injustice. Instead, they�re blogging, posting, talking. In particular, Walter should be applauded for sticking his neck out and putting his name in a story when it means he�ll probably get blacklisted from any of the few journalism jobs for which he might have applied. Is he a saint? I know he isn�t. But truly, he�s heroic in this one thing: He stood up for every LANG worker who�s wrongly been made to feel unworthy and replaceable.

  • Chris Jackson 04/24/2008 2:57:00 AM

    As one of the people laid off at the Breeze back at the end of February, I can say that your story is spot-on. I'm actually glad I don't work there anymore, even though I enjoyed what I did and got along well with my co-workers. Now the place is a mess, filled with the Press-Telegram castoffs, too many deadlines, and a general sense of impending doom. Thanks for killing journalism, Lean Dean.

  • Another nobody 04/14/2008 6:14:00 AM

    Indeed, with that, "good day sir!" Because I need to get back to finding solutions. Lord knows, if the million dollar man who built this media empire can't come up with the answers, I should. After all, the decline of newspapers snuck up on us all. I took a business course in J School. I can do it. Stop laughing! I can do it! Let's see, the lesson many of us have learned from this businessman is, buy it even if you can't maintain it. Then go before a senate committee and lie. Tell them you need the ability to buy more of these publications, not just to make money, but also to save local news and to save newsrooms. (People do watch CSpan you see). But it's not like he really actually meant that, did he langobserved? It's not like you can take a businessman at his word, is it? Business is business. It's not about people. It's about money. We should all stop whining. And you're right langobserved, there are tons of people with access. I can see them lining up to tell the story as we speak. Of course I was looking for insider the the courage to actually tell the story. My poo don't smell good. I ain't stepping forward. I lack cojones and am still at the mercy of these idiots just like you Langobserved. Check to see where your cojones are son. Oh and I do want to see a vote on the Donrey issue. Also raise your hands if you approve of the Orange County Register paying barely minimum wage to reporters who are filling the daily AND their weeklies. Oh yeah the news is out on that because the OC Weekly (love them or hate them) has a brass pair . And a lot of those stories come from ex-Register employees. That's a disclaimer specifically designed to make sure langobserved isn't further offended. A show of hands for those who approve of all the abuse and threats Sam Zell is hurling at his employees. Holy cow! How is it the public knows more of what is going on with these other organizations than with the MediaNews groups? Hmmm, I wonder. But, again, as Langobserved has pointed out LOTS OF PEOPLE have access to this humbling story. Ron Kaye, you're out the TV circuit. I look forward to reading your version of events and your take on what the company has done. I expect it's coming to a place we can all see it soon. Can you feel the excitement. I can.

  • langobserved 04/14/2008 4:37:00 AM

    One more thing, and then I'll shut up. Show of hands, who thinks the Donrey model of squeezing workers till they screamed was an example of good employee relations or good journalism. Either or both?

  • langobserved 04/14/2008 3:58:00 AM

    Well, everybody likes the smell of their own farts and I suppose I'm no different. So I'll admit that I like to write, which is why I got into the business. So you got me there. Yes I'm trying to preserve my job, which is not particularly unreasonable. And no I don't think Cromer is a "bad" guy. I think he's just another opportunistic freelancer trying to shoehorn some facts into a familiar narrative. As far as ethics goes, I think it is imperative that if you're a business partner of somebody you're quoting, you reveal that fact, particularly if you're representing that person, even metaphorically, as an icon of morality and courage - French resistance fighters, for pete's sake. It's called full disclosure and it's pretty damn basic. Don't make me school you, son. Lots of people have Cromer's access by the way. And Steve O'Sullivan and Ron Kaye are very well placed to tell this story. Kaye in fact has been on the talk show circuit. The difference with him is you see what you get. With Cromer you don't. Now, I'll repeat this one more time and then I'm done. Singleton is a businessman. Businessmen are in business to make money. It is becoming increasingly hard to make money in this business because of a change in technology. So the people who wish to make a living in this business anyway will have to accept this as a fact of life or come up with an idea that makes it possible to do what they love and make money at it. Don't whine about being victims of the bad bad bad businessman. Especially if you're a believer in "free enterprise." You got an idea for how to make money in this market? Let's hear it now. If you don't and you just want to smell your own farts, then do keep in mind that others may not like it as much as you do. This is the downside of capitalism. Other workers have had to deal with it. Now you do. So deal with it.

  • Another Nobody 04/14/2008 3:51:00 AM

    I had to speak up because I suspect that I'm familiar with the person who wrote the entry above me. But I can't figure out which one of you it is. I would have put my name on this, but I'll tell you what Langobserved, you show me yours and I'll show you mine. First of all, you're so into ethics I would love to hear you "thesis" on the entry below Holly's. I know we'll get a response because you write like someone who poops potpourri and likes the sound of their own voice. Second, let me assure you that Ms. Robaina has indeed been a journalist and a very ethical one at that. Third, your need for anonymity makes me suspect you either have a very well placed friend that keeps you off the hatchet list (for now) or you are a boss. Either way, your attack of Cromer for his past with the company is so pathetic given the current environment, it's almost hard to express. This writer used his connections to get a story that none of us would tell. Certainly not you Mr. or Ms. "I-still-work-for-this-exploitive-businessman." You got it good. You still have a job don't you? Enjoy paycheck "friend." The rest of us are biting our lip watching, waiting, hoping that someone will see how BAD it has gotten. I'm so sorry that it wasn't you that lifted the lid off this boling mess. I'm sorry that it was some G*d@mned pornographer who likes to photograph tatas and who used to be on the inside, but was fired some 20 years ago because he couldn't get on the same "safe from harm" list you're on. ACTUALLY by a show of hands, I'd like to see who has the cajones to tell the reporters' side of the story. We need your resume. It can't be anyone who has a history with the company. I know MediaNews owns almlost everything along the west coast, but we prefer if you've NEVER WORKED FOR SINGLETON PAPER. Please have a spotless record. When we determine you do, maybe you can write us a nice polite article that Frank and Steve and ALL the bosses will be lining up to be quoted in. It can't be folks like the photog from the San Jose Merc who's photos of an empty newsroom prompted Dave Butler to send out an email response. It can't be any of the reporters who were recently laid off like Paul Oberjuerge or Wes Hughes, because they obviously have an axe to grind, nor can it be Mike Rappaport. It probably shouldn't be Ron Kaye or Steve O'Sullivan. And it probably should not be a majority of people who work in MediaNews and it probably can't be the people who used to rely on the Daily News, The Press Telegram (that damned Long Beach City Council), Daily Bulletin (mean old readers who found out the building was empty) or the Sun for their news. Sound like I'm exaggerating? I almost am. Who has the kind of access Cromer did who can cover this completely and totally impartially? I suggest Langobserved call the Pope. See if he can do it for you. As for the rest of us, we'll wait with baited breath for your next thrilling installment of "But, but, but, Cromer is a bad man."

  • langobserved 04/14/2008 1:53:00 AM

    Holly Vicente Robaina misunderstands. I don't defend Singleton. I just question the journalism of somebody who has a conflict of interest. This is a simple principle, which I'm sure she understands if she's been a journalist. My comment about journalists expecting more than "dumb union hacks" was of course meant ironically. I'm not mocking working people nor am I mocking those journalists who've seen themselves as working folk, attempted to build that kind of consciousness in others and who understand their interests lie with their fellow workers, whether they be uneducated Vons checkers or skilled machinists. I am mocking those who seem themselves as better than working people, which in my long experience in the business has been too many if not most, particulary among the younger more conservative reporters. And finally I only point out the hypocrisy of someone attacking an exploitive businessman (who I work for, thereby explaining my need for anonymity to all but the most naive and dull-witted) who has long been associated with a business that is considered particularly exploitive - porn. OK? How would you feel about these great local heros if they were selling movies of your daughter having sex? Are those terms easy enough to understand? Hope so.

  • LANG Escapee 04/12/2008 10:05:00 AM

    Ya know what, you attack the writer for his lack of disclosure and ethics, and then you spout the company line? And do you know how badly ethics have been bent out of shape in the Sun newsroom in recent years, all for one little girl's death? Do you know how many of the recently laid off would have lined up to talk to him? And have been talking on message boards such as this one? Yes, Singleton is a businessman, and he is trying to protect his business (and profits). But if he's such a good businessman, how come he didn't see this recession coming and plan for it? And how come this great businessman had to go practically into hock to grab another paper that he obviously couldn't afford. After all, he's the one who went before Congress and said we didn't need those pesky media ownership regulations that would have kept him for overexpanding his empire. Economic downturns are cyclical (see Bush Sr.'s presidency) and the demise of journalism and newspapers as we know them should come as a surprise to any one of us. These times had been foretold when many of us were in college in the late 80s and early 90s. Year after year, we were told we needed to be the local, local paper to survive the changes coming at us with the Internet and the decline of readers. And yet, year after year, LANG's papers have gotten less and less local as departments were thinned out, combined and dumbed down. So now we're supposed to trust this brain trust? And brave new world of journalism? C'mon. These papers can't even afford to invest in the proper tools, let alone reporters, to go into that brave new world. Shouldn't there be enough laptops, cell phones and video cameras to go around? But, who knows? Five years from now, we may look back upon this time as when things turned around and we'll all be hailing him and his cronies as geniuses. I seriously doubt it.

  • Holly Vicente Robaina 04/12/2008 4:56:00 AM

    I'm an Ontario native. My parents were both born in the Inland Empire. They, and everyone in our extended family, had always subscribed to the Daily Report/Daily Bulletin. Not anymore. That's because its local quality is gone. My parents are working-class folk who didn't want The Times. Or The Sun: They wanted to see photos and stories of people within their own community. We have now-yellowed, faded clippings from old Report/Bulletin issues. These include a photo of me at age 3, at Guasti Regional Park. It was taken by Bob Swetnam, a Progress-Bulletin photographer. I never met Mr. Swetnam, but my friend Walt Weis worked at the paper for enough years that perhaps he knew him. In my youth, I thought of the reporters and photographers at the Report/Bulletin as hometown heroes. My parents recognized their names from reading them daily. These local journalists were well-respected for their tireless work to keep us informed about the happenings in our community. In 1997, I was thrilled to land a position at my hometown paper, The Daily Bulletin. I still remember introducing my parents to some of the journalists, including Walt. For Mom and Dad, it was like meeting celebrities. (Literally: "WOW! That's the Walt Weis whose name we see in the paper!") That was a wonderful time at the Bulletin: I didn't make much money, but I felt treasured as an employee. Donrey held regular thank-you luncheons for us, and we had monthly clips and photo contests where we were recognized with certificates--and money!--for excellent work. (I loved these paper pats-on-the-back, and still have my stack of certificates.) There was even respect and well-wishing for employees who were moving on: The company bought cakes and gave farewell parties on their last day. Morale was sky high; personally, I jumped out of bed every morning, excited to get to work. One of my most treasured possessions is a Quill pen with the Donrey logo--employees received this for their one-year anniversary. Lest anyone think I'm overstating how great the Bulletin was during this time, I could refer you to my current pastor: I once called his cell in a panic because I'd thought I lost my "lucky pen" at church! Most of my years at the Bulletin are an excellent memory. Most of them. When the LANG merger occurred in the summer of 1999, I knew it was time to leave. There was talk of downsizing, specifically within the entertainment/lifestyle department where I worked. As I understand it, these departments are essentially gone now; the articles for these sections are either wire pieces or are written by writers from other papers. But why would anyone pay for this material in the Bulletin when they can read it online for free? My family--and many readers I met as a Bulletin reporter--subscribed to the paper largely for the localized angle, which offered information on OUR restaurants and attractions, OUR events. Our people. The Bulletin even provided recipes from local chefs and housewives. We had stories about the hot styles that actually were trends in the Inland Valley--complete with local models. Our neighbors were the ones featured and photographed in health, food, fashion, and auto stories. We had photos of locally restored and souped-up cars, the ones you'd actually see driving down Euclid Avenue or Foothill Boulevard. Maybe talking about capris being in style wasn't unique, but the quotes about this trend were from residents of Ontario, Upland, Rancho, etc. And the photo of the girl wearing the capris was of a local teen. Yes, Mr. Singleton, that photo of our neighbor's daughter actually sold newspapers. Obviously, interacting with the community was a lot of work. But it was so worth it when a mother would come into the office and buy a stack of newspapers because her child had been featured. My biggest heartbreak was the disappearance of the Bulletin's "Kids" section, which Shannon Guthrie and I built from scratch as a way to encourage young people to read. Actually, Shannon pushed me into it, but I was thankful for her vision and the Bulletin's willingness to take a risk back then. It was very popular--so much so, Donrey interviewed Shannon and me on how we created the section! Donrey used our success as a model for their other newspapers. Again, here was a section that featured local teens and kids, for which we received tremendous feedback from the community, and it additionally served a higher purpose. Yet it was one of the first sections to fall after the merger. I'm baffled about the decision to un-localize, to use wire stories and pieces by out-of-area reporters to "save money." To "save the community papers." Articles about locals--and the accompanying feeling of ownership--was the Bulletin's main selling point. As was the celebrity and relationship with familiar, long-time writers and photographers, such as Walt Weis. I'm guessing other locals were as disappointed in the Bulletin's changes as my parents: The Bulletin's daily circ for March 1997 is listed as just over 57,000 on the MediaNews Group website--that's nearly a third lower than it was a decade previous, when I went to work there. As a reporter back then, I did most interviews face-to-face with community members, because that's how I was taught to do it at the Bulletin. People were excited to meet me. I developed a deeper appreciation for the community that gave me a job, and they in turn developed a deeper love for their local newspaper. Yes, I know things have changed since then. Yes, I know it's about advertising, not subscription, dollars. But in a day when news about everything is readily available, yet people can't find the news that matters most to them, local papers with a local angle surely could be the new, hot commodity. If, indeed, Dean Singleton truly and nobly wants to save the local papers, then he must save the format, too. Let MSN.com give readers all the AP stories. Give my parents and their neighbors the story about their friend who makes the best strawberry jam in town. That's what they long to read. Mr. Singleton, I'd like to appeal to your sense of leaving a legacy for a moment. People long for community. We lack community. There is little that ties us to our neighbors anymore, and as much as we'd like to know one another, we lack a basis on which to connect. You hold an incredible medium to bring people together. As the owner of most SoCal newspapers, you could do something huge that would bring people together. Unite 'em by reminding them of their shared experience, and showing them who their neighbors are. There was a mass exodus after I left the Bulletin. I'm sad to hear that great talents who hung on, like Walt, were given the boot despite their loyalty. Walter took my wedding photographs, for free, because that's the kind of guy he is. He well knew my situation as a writer who was struggling to pay the rent AND eat because he'd lived it for decades. Lastly, as a college-educated writer, and as the daughter of a blue-collar union worker, I'm tremendously distressed that someone, who apparently works for LANG, is mocking journalists as "people with college degrees who think they deserve better than what them dumb union hacks get." This is an all-around insult to hard-working people of every situation. Mr. Singleton and Mr. Lambert, if you know who wrote this comment, it is morally incumbent upon you to correct this attitude. Journalists dedicate their lives to giving far more than they'll ever receive. None of your employees deserves such disrespect. I've posted my full name so as to be accountable for my words, and to encourage LANG journalists who have memories of your own glory days. You are amazing: Persevere!

  • Duke 04/10/2008 5:49:00 AM

    Paul Oberjuerge gives a new account of the Eastern LANG screwing at http://www.oberjuerge.com/?p=49

  • S. Lambert 04/09/2008 5:13:00 AM

    John, you had them backwards, Its Langobserved Frank & Dittohead Jeff.

  • John Adams 04/09/2008 4:25:00 AM

    Hello Langobserved Jeff and Dittohead Frank!

  • Trace Campbell 04/08/2008 1:55:00 AM

    This is a write up in his home town paper Please put something in your paper about this. He will die without treatment. http://news.mywebpal.com/news_tool_v2.cfm?show=localnews&pnpID=728&NewsID=890373&CategoryID=3481&on=1 My brother is dieing with testiclar cancer Please help we need help to get him treatment. Dontation can be made to THE MICAH CAMPBELL CANCER FUND P.O BOX 471 ROCKMART GA 30153 Trace Campbell

  • langobserved 04/06/2008 9:07:00 AM

    I'm not defending Pine or any of the Singleton crew. But why in god's name would they return a call from you claiming to be doing a balanced report on a newsroom shakeup when everybody knows you are the friend and business associate of someone they had just laid off? Get real. I don't deny that you have a right to write whatever your editors will let you write. And even that your long spotty career with various news organizations may in fact give you insight into what is happening in LANG today. However, your analysis brings nothing new to the picture, apart from painting your friends as victims of a corporate pirate. It follows the predictable formula that what is happening is the bad, lowbrow corporate suit ruining these fine newspapers for, god no, profit victimizing stalwart newsmen like Weis and other working class heroes who only live for getting the story, getting it first and getting it right. Bullshit. We are seeing an absolutely radical transformation of how news is delivered across the board. It is changing the industry, like well, like the internet changed porn, which I'm sure you could write quite authoritatively about. Singleton has kept small papers going, by cuts and reducing the huge margins other companies, like KR and Tribune, expect. He is no angel but he's not demon either. He's a business man in a business that's going south. This is what happens when businesses face hard times: layoffs, retrenchments, cuts in bonuses and salaries. Managers have to make hard decisions, choose who to throw overboard. Whether they are made fairly or not is a good question, but not one that can be answered without a true commitment to the craft of reporting and fact finding. I don't want to preach to you but frankly it's a no brainer that you don't choose a pal to hold up as an example since it is rather unlikely that you will write anything that reflects negatively on that person. Yes, when the shit hits the fan the workers get screwed first and hardest. They always have. Nothing new there either. Just that it's happening to people with college degrees who think they deserve better than what them dumb union hacks get. Were you crying this loud for the workers in the manufacturing plants that got sent overseas over the last three decades, or were you out shopping for a new Honda? Oh I forgot, you were out struggling to help ex cons acquire new job skills that would get them dignified and respectable work. That's just the kind of guy you are, unlike that slimeball Singleton. As for who I am, who cares? At least people now know who you are.

  • hmmmmm 04/05/2008 4:48:00 AM

    Grobaty, Canalis, and Hennessy are reporters now? You might want to tell them that. And if you knew them, you'd admit that Gerwitz and Collins wouldn't spout off the kind of nonsense you're pushing here.

  • Mark Cromer 04/05/2008 12:42:00 AM

    In response to the anonymous comments posted by 'langobserved' and 'dittohead,' I have indeed been a long-time colleague of Walt Weis dating back to 1989, and have worked with Walt on numerous jobs throughout the years since then, from the Daily Bulletin to Low Magazine to Hustler. So what? Walt was hardly the only moonlighting journalist I know. I was indeed a staff writer at the Daily Bulletin and also the old Thomson LA Newsgroup, the dailies of which have since been gutted by Singleton's cuts, and am friends with staff writers and photographers that I worked with throughout the years on other projects. I have also written for the Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles Daily Journal and other weekly and daily newspapers around greater LA and have worked with a lot of reporters on various projects. And yes, I was indeed fired from my $8-an-hour reporter gig at the Daily Bulletin by editor George Collier back in 1990, canned for publishing an article in Low Magazine that compared then Cal Poly President Hugh LaBounty to Richard Nixon. LaBounty had fired the advisor to the student newspaper, legendary newsman David Henley, and was seeking to curb its independence on campus. LaBounty was friends with Bulletin publisher Dave Caffoe, and Caffoe told Collier to let me go. Far from holding a grudge against Collier, it wasn't long before I realized that was one of the best things that could happen to me, as I landed another staff job for more money, at a better newspaper, and started freelancing for the Times, the Weekly and other publications. The suggestion that now, nearly 20 years later, this somehow imperils the journalistic soundness of my article on Singleton's hollowing out of the suburban dailies is absurd. I called Singleton for comment, as well as Frank Pine, neither chose to offer their perspective. Regardless, I still got Singleton's voice into the story through the quote he gave CJR a few years back, and included the view of Mariel Garza that she didn't feel Singleton was orchestrating some "dastardly scheme." Oddly, while attacking my credibility on this story, 'langobserved' and 'dittohead' don't challenge the comments of Weis, or any of the other staffers quoted in the article. Perhaps that's because the quotes paint an accurate picture of what's happening at Singleton's newspapers. Even more telling is the anonymous nature of the posted comments. I wonder why they are afraid to identify themselves by name and stand behind their comments? -- Mark Cromer

  • From Emmalee 04/04/2008 10:53:00 PM

    Here is that article that I was talking about in the LA Weekly, they do have it online and its one of their top hits.

  • ptjournalist 04/04/2008 10:22:00 PM

    I realize most journalists are math impaired, but there are 23 writers and columnists at the PT. I was also counting Tom Hennessy, who, yes, is semi-retired. That makes 24. Let me break it down: City Desk: 1 Paul Eakins 2 Tracy Manzer 3 Pamela Hale 4 Joe Stevens 5 Kelly Puente 6 Joe Segura 7 Greg Mellen 8 Samantha Gonzaga 9 Wendy Thomas Russell 10 Kevin Butler 11 John Canalis Business 12 Kris Hanson 13 Karen Robes City columnist 14 Tim Grobaty Sports 15 Frank Burlison 16 David Felton 17 Bob Keisser 18 James Melroy 19 Robert Morales Sports columnist 20 Doug Krikorian Features 21 Al Rudis 22 A.K. Whitney 23 Phillip Zonkel Hope that helps. And, Hmmm? I am not an editor, but even if I were a crappy one as you claim, that is still a really nasty slam at editors like Jason Gewirtz and Jody Collins. They do not deserve your vitriol.

  • dittohead 04/04/2008 6:24:00 PM

    Can I say amen to langobserved? As professional news organizations go the way of the buggy whip in favor of organizations like LA WEEKLY, we lose the traditional values of American journalism, including paying attention to minor details like obvious conflicts of interest. How do the editors of the Weekly justify using a writer who has a long working relationship with his source who he quotes favorably? Why doesn't Mr. Cromer mention his business partnership with Weis? Probably because it would undercut the illusion of impartiality that he's trying to foster.

  • hmmmmm 04/04/2008 12:19:00 PM

    ptjournalist: I'm not sure PT editors have earned the right to call themselves "journalists," just so you know.

  • PT writer 04/04/2008 9:08:00 AM

    As a current PT staffer, I have a correction for PTjournalist. The number of reporters at the PT, with features, sports and columnists, is 18 - not 24. Also, the PT's creative talent, the few remaining writers and photographers left, now earn 5% less, on average, than they did when Singleton purchased the paper in 1998...Another important point: PT newsroom staff has been cut 80 percent since the Singleton purchase, while circulation has dropped about 17 percent. Bloodletting in the newsroom has FAR outpaced declines in circulation or revenue. The tragedy of this situation is that residents and readers - who rely on the PT to be a watchdog for their community - are being shortchanged in the name of profits.

  • langobserved 04/04/2008 4:22:00 AM

    Unbelievable. A business partner of Walt Weis who worked with him on numerous pornographic projects (jail babes etc.) and was fired from the Daily Bulletin writes an allegedly professional news item about the decline of LANG and quotes Weis without qualification or even the least effort at disclosure. LA WEEKLY not your finest hour.

  • ptjournalist 04/04/2008 2:09:00 AM

    I have another correction for you: The managing editor, not the editor in chief, was let go at the Press-Telegram. Also, the 12 reporters in question comprise only the business dept. and the city desk. Features, sports and columnists were not included. With them, the number is double. That said, I agree that Singleton has not done right by this paper. However, I really hate it when outsiders get their facts wrong!

  • DH Clark 04/04/2008 2:04:00 AM

    Yes, I would subscribe to the Daily Bulletin, my local paper (despite corporate stooge Frank Pine's attempts to fire me eight years ago--not long after the serious bloodletting there had begun) but the Pennysaver has higher quality local news. So sad. And yes, the DB is located in Ontario, not Pomona.

  • a nother nonny 04/03/2008 8:23:00 PM

    I have read and put up with the PT since the mid sixties. I finally had to cancel the paper since there is no local news whatsoever. I wish the Register would deliver to us.

  • C.J. 04/03/2008 8:02:00 PM

    Go here for some more about the bloodletting. http://www.oberjuerge.com/?p=3

  • LA Weekly Reader 04/03/2008 7:48:00 PM

    Interesting read and it appears to capture some spot on observations - however the Daily Bulletin is not located in Pomona. I hate to see a incorrect detail minimize the message of this story by the appearing out of touch.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy