Top

news

Stories

 

Hillary Clinton Wins, Republican Style

(Be afraid, be very afraid)

HILLARY CLINTON HAS FINALLY FIGURED OUT how to win a few big states. She had tried, alternately, the poses of inevitability, experience, motherliness, wisdom, scrappiness and steadfastness, all to little avail. Finally, she's found the solution. After all, her campaign now calls itself "Solutions for America." To heal her own malady of consistently losing to Barack Obama, Clinton decided to scrap any innovation and reach for Granny's old standby, fix-it-all remedy: When in doubt, just run like a Republican.

Well done, Hillary. Somewhere from above (or, most likely, from below), departed Republican mudmeister Lee Atwater is cracking a grin, and Willie Horton is clanging on the bars of his prison cell in admiration. Clinton regained her footing this past week primarily by running a classic, sewer-level, negative, fear-based ad that evoked all the political, dirty-pool nightmares that Democrats at least claim to abhor (except those, of course, who were moved by the spot). Clinton's detestable ad was about as subtle as a full-throttled Swift Boat making a midnight run right through your backyard swimming pool.

Stripped to its core message, the craftily honed ad warned that if Obama were selected, your children could be murdered in their beds in the middle of the night as a feckless, greenhorn president slept right through some sort of global thermonuclear attack. The red phone's a-ringin', but the dopey new prez hazily snores right through it, while hazily dreaming of hope and change. (Perhaps Ambien ought to consider buying up the rights to the Clinton spot.)

Hats off, then, to Hillary and her public-relations chief, Mark Penn, for administering just the right dosage of dope. The spot worked so well — with exit polls showing that voters who made a last-minute decision went in droves for Clinton — that she couldn't resist reprising the same line during her Tuesday-night victory speech delivered to a cheering throng in Columbus. "When that phone rings at 3 a.m. in the White House," she said, "there's no time for speeches or on on-the-job training."

I have no doubt that as Bill Clinton's wife, Hillary spent many, many anxious nights alone by the phone at 3 in the morning, but I don't remember ever reading exactly which world crisis she solved while sitting around in her jammies. I can think of a few she helped ignite, like, say, Iraq, but I guess that wouldn't be fair to bring up. Might be sexist.

Now, to be gracious, one must concede that to be a winner, you have to win, and there's no crying by the loser allowed in politics. And Tuesday night, Hillary Clinton unreservedly won three out of four states. Now, to be realistic, Barack Obama has won twice as many primary and caucus states this season as Clinton, he continues to lead substantially in the popular vote, and he continues to hold what is a near mathematically insurmountable lead in elected delegates.

For two or three days, the Clinton campaign will spin itself — and the media — silly, breathlessly celebrating her overwhelming victories in Rhode Island and Ohio and her squeaker in Texas. After the confetti is swept and the champagne bottles are tossed, a more sober reality will take hold. Not just that her net gain of delegates this week will be, at most, in the single digits, but worse: There is no plausible scenario in which Clinton can win the nomination. At least, not democratically.

Seven more weeks of campaign slog through Wyoming, Mississippi, and into Pennsylvania. And then maybe tack on six more weeks, if you can believe it, into Indiana, West Virginia and a handful of other states, and into Puerto Rico on the 7th of June, quite literally into D-day. Whatever the outcome, even if Clinton wins all of the remaining contests — and some of them by veritable landslides — she will still be dozens of elected delegates behind Barack Obama.

Clinton will be exactly where she was the night before Ohio and Texas: in second place and with no way to become the nominee unless enough unelected superdelegates defy the popular will of the electorate and throw her the nomination (or unless you somehow believe that she can win every coming primary with a 20-point margin).

Indeed, as every major newsmagazine has pointed out this week, Clinton can't win an elected majority of delegates even if she triumphs in what are now likely to be rescheduled primaries in the cranky states of Michigan and Florida. Again, we'd be back to the superdelegates and, therefore, back to a dicey game of chicken by the Democratic Party elite. How many superdelegates are willing to politically die, or willing to spark an intraparty civil war, just to save Clinton's bacon?

"The 1968 Chicago convention would look like a picnic compared to what Denver would become," a longtime political biographer said on election eve, predicting a youth uprising at the site of this summer's Democratic Convention if the election is thrown to Clinton. "This isn't 40 years ago," he said. "Now, everyone's got a car. And everyone who believed in the change that Clinton scoffs at would wind up surrounding that convention."

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Steve 03/14/2008 10:44:00 AM

    Clinton has already indicated her preference for McCain over Obama as the next president. Hence, her scorched earth strategy: not concerned about leaving the Democratic party in tatters if she cannot win the nomination.

  • Taylor 03/12/2008 8:27:00 PM

    I love you Marc

  • Thomas Mc 03/11/2008 5:04:00 PM

    Hillary doesn't have to channel the GOP, she's a paid operative. The only thing Democratic about her is her voter registration.

  • chad 03/10/2008 9:23:00 PM

    Let me guess. You supported Nader because Gore was no different than Bush.

  • Candyland 03/08/2008 9:18:00 AM

    Bill Clinton tore the democratic party apart in the 90s with the dems losing the House for the first time in 40 years and him handing the world George W. Bush. So it's only fitting that his wife in turn hand the presidency to John McCain.

  • Susan Zakin 03/08/2008 4:24:00 AM

    Marc, I'm sorry to say this is the best piece I've read on the Obama-Clinton race for the nomination. Sorry to say it because I fear you're right. Writing well is small comfort when you're watching something so wantonly destructive. But I'm glad you're out there. Susan

  • Paul Lacques 03/07/2008 11:26:00 PM

    So if Hillary Clinton winds up "dozens of elected delegates" behind Obama, that equals "the popular will of the electorate?" Wow, there's a stretch of the imagination. It's hard to like Hillary. She's just not cool, and we've all seen Obama's jumpshot on YouTube. But this is a presidential election, despite its facebook/prom queen tone. Both candidates are equally unqualified and inexperienced, with weak and fake stands on the dire issues facing the U.S. and the world. Let's not pillory Hillary just because she's uncool. Let's ask both candidates to get real on the issues. Sparing the wealthy from real taxes, pushing clean coal and carbon credits, telling Americans they're paying too much for gas, watered down health care initiatives--these are their near identical stances. Let's grow up. Let's call them on their adolescent views. And if the candidates are so dedicated to serving the American people, they can split financing new primaries in Florida and Michigan. They have an embarassment of wealth in the campaign funds, and it ain't from the electorate.

  • Jim Curran 03/07/2008 9:58:00 PM

    Excellent work Marc! What exactly is the depth and breadth of Hilary's "experience?" 35 years ago, as Rush Limbaugh pointed out 2 weeks ago, she graduated from college! How was she "fighting for us" whilst preparing for the commencement ceremony then studying for the bar exam? Years later when Obama was graduating from Law School, he had finished a successful run as the 1st African American elected as President of the HArvard Law Review. Pretty accomplished in the area of experience himself indeed. Fast forwarding to the Clinton White House years. Once again as Rush points out: she had no security clearance, did not attend NSC meetings when crises and subjects such as Kosovo, Oklahoma City, Al Qeida (hello?) were discussed. A true fighter might have nudged her re-doubtable husband during pillow talk about some Iraqui despot and a crazy rag tag group of Afghan terrorists with growing chips on their shoulder about the Great Satan. But mulling over scandals such as Whitewater and commodities windfall profits, and of course the question of "Where the hell IS Bill at 3 in the morning?" can overtake even the most dedicated fighter. Having sat on, I believe the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for the past 3-plus years gives Barack Obama more foreign police experience than 4 out of our last 5 elected Presidents. 2 ex-governors, 2 active ones. The world is where it is due to some of the works of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Clinton and W. Bush, but the most recent former First Lady has had no finger prints found on any of it. Oh wait! Forgot about that elephant in the room, DOH!! Thanks Senator Clinton for helping George W. send over 4,000 young Americans to their deaths for...for...what exactly? Hmmm. As soon as you had a position of authority in the government from which to "fight" for us, you chose combat alright. We fight, we lose. Why would any self-respecting Democrat want to help you win now? It's been quite an "experience!"

  • Jon R. 03/07/2008 8:40:00 PM

    Marc Cooper, Thank you for expressing my exact thoughts about Hillary Clinton and her foolish, wanton destruction of the Democratic party out of her own self-interest. She could not win the nomination democratically, so she resorts to running down the Democrat frontrunner using the Karl Rove playbook, thereby ensuring John McCain's ascent to the White House. Preying on the fears of the electorate will always favor the Republicans. THANKS A LOT HILLARY!!!

  • Greg Wall 03/07/2008 7:35:00 PM

    Ah, maybe one of Cooper's editors(could he actually have one?) might remind him that Clinton has ALREADY won a few big states, so his credibility is shot in the first sentence. Or, maybe someone would notice that he's doing some serious fear mongering of his own. Wouldn't it be terrible if we actually had a primary where the whole country got to vote; and a convention that wasn't a beauty contest? Or, we could point out that Cooper's disclaimer about no crying in politics; tacked into yet another sore loser piece about Hillary Clinton; who has once again proved him wrong (anybody keeping count?) doesn't mean much. Or, the seasoned Cooper reader might notice that those dispicable Republican tactics never seem to bother him much when practiced by Republicans he is on the record as respecting, like his anti-torture hero John McCain. Ho-hum. Punching the logic clock against the hapless Cooper is getting a boring as one of his pieces.

  • Laylah 03/07/2008 7:44:00 AM

    ..uprising if the nomination is thrown to Clinton. "This isn't 40 years ago..now everyone's got a car." And text messaging, a cell phone,a wireless laptop,email, a blog and Facebook. We don't have Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, and the yippie party. Do you think Tom Hayden would be interested (again)?

  • LTL 03/06/2008 11:34:00 PM

    Big problem with Big State wins for Clinton. Those rural and suburban areas will be majority Republican in the general election (we see it every Presidential cycle). The Republicans haven't turned out en masse for the primary, but that will change for the general. Thus Obama winning the urban areas is way more potent for what it means for the Democrats in the General. Democrats need the URBAN/Big City areas....

  • Chris 03/06/2008 10:55:00 PM

    When you're up against a misogynist media machine that's obviously and shamelessly pro-Obama (no, I didn't drink the Kool-Aid), the Clinton campaign ads are the kind of offense one must do for their candidacy to survive. Also, enough with the trite, hackneyed Hillary villifying as if she's miles away from Obama's politics. Let's instead discuss Obama's rebellious, revolutionary image (as portrayed by the media) contradicting the fact that he nary has a rebellious, revolutionary idea or position on anything.

  • dg90804 03/06/2008 8:02:00 PM

    I've had about all the Hillary bashing I can take. Obama is a two dimensional fraud.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy