Top

news

Stories

 

Silver Lake's Nasty Land Feud

Ten years ago, City Hall created a dog park turned fecal pile. Now, nearby, city fathers want a "meadow"

THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF SILVER LAKE is the only place in Los Angeles that has more cheese stores than doughnut shops. It has a reputation as a hipster haven, but in reality it's a destination for the upwardly mobile to raise children. Politically active. Informed. Opinionated. Think of it as Berkeley with a wax job.

Thomas Holmes

Pooper-Fund Site: Silver Lake Dog Park was a green enclave when the City Council took over
Thomas Holmes
Pooper-Fund Site: Silver Lake Dog Park was a green enclave when the City Council took over
Now it's a barren mess.
Patrick Cates
Now it's a barren mess.

(Click to enlarge)

Pooper-Fund Site: Silver Lake Dog Park was a green enclave when the City Council took over

Patrick Cates

(Click to enlarge)

Now it's a barren mess.

"It's a mixed neighborhood," says 28-year resident Sheila Girlum. "You can't tell who's rich and who's poor because they dress the same." The only thing missing, she says, is more black residents, "and I don't know why they're not here."

Even with its idiosyncrasies, Silver Lake is far from unique. Like everywhere, its political dramas are packed with passion and rife with absurdity. In an area where the majority of residents have their own yards, the firestorm has been over a roughly six-acre plot of green space, the Meadow.

It sits at the north end of Silver Lake Reservoir and has been closed off from the public, by most accounts, for 60 years. The open-air reservoir is being decommissioned as a source of city drinking water due to tighter environmental rules.

The question now is whether the admittedly public land surrounding the reservoir, long fenced in, should be opened to the public. Or should it be a wildlife sanctuary for birds and coyotes?

Open it or keep it closed?

Councilman Eric Garcetti of Council District 13 vowed to double the green space in his district when he took office, stating on his Web site, "We dug in deep, creating parks from an alleyway in Hollywood, vacant lots throughout the district, and pockets of land adjacent to the Los Angeles River." His goal was simple: more parks. Open it.

But a "public planning process" has stumbled along for a decade, involving surveys, community meetings, forums and workshops for a project that sounds like it was lifted from a comic book villain's agenda — The Silver Lake Master Plan.

Unveiled in 2000, the master plan outlined the possible future of the reservoir, including a completed walkway/jogging path around the lake and a potential new park. Nothing was for sure. Then last year, suddenly, the groundbreaking for the Meadow was announced. Those who felt blind-sided objected, immediately setting off accusations from supporters that they were just rich people trying to keep the unwashed masses away.

"All the wealthy think they own the beach and that land is there for us to enjoy," is how Matthew Spizer, a 10-year resident, puts it.

To the other residents living around the closed-off lake it's not that simple. What seems like an open-and-shut case of NIMBYism to outsiders is a complex issue to the residents. "Nothing is galvanizing people like the Meadow," notes five-year resident and blogger Will Campbell, who says he's for opening the fenced-in land.

When asked what he thought of the city-developed Silver Lake Dog Park, not far away on the southern tip of the lake, Campbell admitted, "From a public-works perspective, it leaves a lot to be desired as far as the design — and what they do to maintain it."

The Silver Lake Dog Park was built 10 years ago after Councilwoman Jackie Goldberg commandeered a quiet patch of city green space. Many residents warned that it was too small to survive the wear and tear from dogs.

Today it stands as a symbol of a broken promise to Silver Lake, derided by some as the worst dog park in L.A. ("Nasty, nasty, nasty," says one dog owner on the Yelp Web site.) If you drive by, you can see that it's now a plot of mist-fine dirt with off-leash dogs prancing in dust clouds and fecal piles — after rain, it's mud and wet fecal piles. There is grass, but not in the plural sense of the word. The fountain is broken. Shade is minimal. If you happen to walk by on a warm day, it smells of mustard gas. It'll make your eyes water and your throat burn.

"It's kind of torn up," says dog-park regular and Silver Lake resident Tracy Richardson.


WITH THE CITY NO LONGER bothering to keep the dog park decent, the Silver Lake Small Dog Park Association is raising funds to build infrastructure and install drainage to spirit away the worst of the muck. The group's Web site is aptly named www.weneedgrass.org. While association member Xandra Kayden speaks highly of the city's efforts to help, the dog park is fodder for apprehension.

Garcetti, noting that the dog park was not created on his watch, says he is trying to funnel state park funds into fixing it, but it "won't ever be what we envision for the Meadow." His aide, Julie Wong, says "dog urine creates a problem for grass growing."

Kelly Hunt is among those who are skeptical about the city's ability to keep its word. She waters city landscaping in front of her house and was told that the contract to maintain the landscaping had run out.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Daren Reifsneider 02/28/2008 9:34:00 AM

    As much as I hate the idea of not being able to take my dog to the Silverlake dog park, it certainly "leaves a lot to be desired". I've watched failed efforts to maintain the grass coupled with disgusting mud pits from the broken water pump. The parking is inadequate and crossing Silverlake Blvd. during rush hour with a dog is an experience in itself. Compared to the Barrington dog park in Brentwood, Silverlake's park is a total failure. Furthermore, rather than avoiding responsibility or accountability, Garcetti should create a task force to evaluate the options, survey neighbors and stakeholders, recruit volunteers, and raise money to improve the dilapidated park.

  • greg 02/27/2008 2:46:00 AM

    HARRY, the Gingergrass comment was made by an opponent of the Meadow park at a meeting about opening the Meadow. A lot of people heard it. If you weren't there, you would not have heard it, even if you were sitting inside Gingergrass. Thanks.

  • greg 02/27/2008 2:10:00 AM

    HARRY, I was using my fingers. Please re-read my comments. I think we're on the same side. I'm all for Meadow park, the Library, and Gingergrass. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Thanks

  • HARRY 02/26/2008 3:01:00 AM

    GREG my friend what part of your body is writing these comments "The City envisions something like the Sheep Meadow in New York's Central Park. It's not supposed to be a second dog park." Sheep or dogs, what do you want ??? It will be open to all our friends. Gingergrass would bring crime to the hood. I live across from Gingergrass and I never heard any such comments. Please get your facts correct. Feel lucky that a Library is being built and not a Walgreens or Burger King.

  • David 02/22/2008 6:49:00 AM

    This article makes me laugh. Did the writer have 3 hours to write it and turn it in? It was probably more like 1. You can't talk about the dog park without talking about the rec center, the jogging path on the west side of the reservoir, the jogging path under construction on the eastside, and the library under construction a block away. All these things have been/are opposed by the same folks who brought you SAVE THE MEADOW. Tina, did you attend any of the community meetings? Did you see the overwhelming support for the Meadow park? Did you see the Silver Lake Neighborhood Council Member spewing lies at the open mike, trying to fling anything at Eric Garcetti in hopes that something, anything would stick and keep the meadow from opening? Eric Garcetti systematically, diplomatically, too politely and rightfully presented reasonable answers that countered every single one of the opponents' concerns. Sure, some of those people were very sincere, but they were just wrong. I don't mean that in any other way than that their facts were wrong, or the opinions they hold are based on facts that are just wrong. That's why Eric was able to counter every single (not, most, but all) the arguments thrown at him from the opposition. So, labeling the NIMBYs NIMBYs is simplistic? I don't think so. What's going on at the Reservoir is years in the planning; the NIMBYs have been screaming for years, and people have been working hard to fight them to improve the neighborhood. The reporting in this article is either dishonest or just not thorough. Yeah, we get it; the Weekly's supposed to be this hip, edgy, anti-authority, snarky publication. But, the dog park's dirty and a mess, so we shouldn't open the meadow? Now, that's simplistic.

  • greg 02/22/2008 12:37:00 AM

    German, how has Eric Garcetti "dropped the ball"?

  • greg 02/22/2008 12:33:00 AM

    German, what are your reasons for opposing the opening of the Meadow?

  • greg 02/22/2008 12:29:00 AM

    Eric Garcetti is demonstrating real leadership here by opening the park. Most of his constituents want the Meadow opened as a park. That has been clear and was certainly clear at the latest community meeting in January. And most of his constituents are also watching his actions and applauding them. Thank you, Eric. Please remember, that the same opposition took positions against the path on West Silver Lake and on the path being built inside the Reservoir. These thing are amazing enhancements to the neighborhood, just as the Meadow park will be. Thanks, again.

  • German 02/22/2008 12:15:00 AM

    I used to be a fan of our Councilman, Eric Garcetti. However, he has completely dropped the ball on this very important issue. His goal is to keep his campaign promise to green the District even if doing so is against his constituents' desires. Note to Eric: You can't fulfill your campaign promise by simply turning this res into a park. We are watching your actions, or, lack thereof on this matter.

  • greg 02/21/2008 9:56:00 PM

    Oh, also, the City has already completed studies that show that there would be no negative impact on the animals in the Meadow and that there would be no negative impact on the traffic in the area. Silver Lakers need to be honest here---traffic's already bad. The notion that the Silver Lake Blvd. perimeter of the east side of reservoir is this traffic-free, quiet oasis that needs to be protected is ridiculous. Many in the area have been requesting stoplights or stop signs along that stretch for years to interrupt the rapid flow of cars speeding along. Now some of those same people claim that its a tranquil area that's going to be disturbed by the Meadow opening. Also, those arguing that there is no parking available in the area should get out of their cars, walk along Silver Lake Blvd., and count the spaces near the Meadow area. There are plenty of them.

  • greg 02/21/2008 9:28:00 PM

    This article, while well-written, doesn't seem too well-researched. First of all, the dog park and its use are not the same as that of the Meadow and its proposed use. The City envisions something like the Sheep Meadow in New York's Central Park. It's not supposed to be a second dog park. The opponents also argued that GINGERGRASS, the Vietnamese restaurant on Glendale Blvd., just a block away from the Meadow, brought "crime" to the neighborhood. Yes, the yuppies eating fresh spring rolls are serious criminals. The opponents didn't want the path on West Silver Lake either, citing crime, traffic, parking. I run there every day. There is little or no crime, traffic has not changed, and there is plenty of parking. The only crime I ever "witnessed" while walking along that path, was hearing a couple fighting and screams of a woman in one of those upscale homes probably getting beat up by her husband. Also, one occasionally runs into dog poop that lazy owners don't clean up. But those are Silver Lakers walking their dogs there. Sorry, but to argue that the NIMBYs are somehow powerless and victimized is absurd. Anyone attending the community meetings knows that their arguments are pretty much red herrings. Their most honest arguments are on blogs like LA.CURBED.COM where they come right out and say that they don't want Mexicans coming to use the Meadow. Does that make the NIMBYs racist? Who knows? Apparently, that is up for interpretation, according to this article and the poor, poor residents of Silver Lake. This is why people in New York City and Chicago make fun of Los Angeles.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy