Top

news

Stories

 

Dennis Kucinich Has Five Minutes for You

Mr. Fish meets America’s peace candidate

“I can only guarantee you five minutes.”

In the middle of a park in Sierra Madre, on an absolutely perfect fall Sunday morning, Sharon Jimenez, senior adviser on the West Coast for U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich’s campaign for president, is laying down some ground rules. We are surrounded by volunteers, who busily set up chairs, sort placards and stack fliers for the congressman’s speech and fund-raiser. Twenty feet away, at a lopsided picnic table beneath a lopsided tree, sits Kucinich, wearing a ginger-colored blazer that immediately makes me wonder how many Winnie-the-Poohs had to die to make it. With his familiar squint and little-boy haircut that always appears as if it has been combed with a hot buttered roll, he nods in response to the conclusions of a Pasadena Weekly reporter.

“I thought you were going to get me a ride-along with him to the airport,” I say to Jimenez.

“Oh, well,” she says, smiling and shrugging her massive shoulder pads.

“But I don’t have any five-minute questions,” I say, holding up my notebook. “All my questions are conversational — they’re Bill Moyer questions.”

“Like I said, I can only guarantee you five minutes,” she says, looking at her watch. “The congressman goes on in about eight minutes, and then he has to be in San Mateo for a straw poll at 2.”

Jimenez’s uncanny resemblance to the band manager and lovable curmudgeon of The Partridge Family, Rubin Kincaid, allows me the grace to forgive her persnickety manner as having less to do with me and more to do with the character that I imagine her to be playing.

“Which airport is he going to?” I ask. “LAX?”

“No, Burbank,” she says, drastically shortening even the drive time I was hoping to get.

“Burbank?” I flip through my notes, looking for short-answer questions, wondering if I’m wasting my time and trying to remember why I came in the first place.

Dennis Kucinich carries around a miniaturized copy of the U.S. Constitution in his pocket as if he’s a 13-year-old virgin with a condom that he hopes to use one day. It has become his trademark prop, like Bob Dole’s pen or Charlie Brown’s bag of rocks. Once you get past the initial embarrassment of pitying the metaphorical 13-year-old who believes that his orgasm is verging on the greater legitimacy of happening outside the self-aggrandized confines of masturbation — perhaps even clearing his skin and broadening his shoulders and deepening his voice into the confident baritone of whatever the political version of Barry White might be — you must admire his unabashed, dweebishly patriotic enthusiasm for what many assume to be the blueprint for American democracy, really an assemblage of Pickwickian axioms insisting, in the grandest tradition of existential absurdity, that the best way to experience freedom is through strict adherence to the claustrophobia of rules, rules that, in this case, were written down more than 220 years ago with a feather and then immediately rendered completely meaningless by myriad ever-present prejudicial hang-ups, the usurping of the government by private corporate oligarchies organized on tyrannical and virulently anti-democratic business principles, and, finally, the perpetuation of gargantuan economic and social disparities among the population.

You have to admire Kucinich, because few politicians seem to be as genuinely moved by their own political peacockery as he is. It’s charming. And then it’s as depressing as hell.

“Here we go,” Jimenez says suddenly, shooting past me in the direction of Kucinich and trailing perfume like a tuna casserole enticing a pack of cats.

“Congressman, this is Dwayne Booth from the L.A. WeeklyI promised him five minutes.” She says this last phrase in a hushed tone, as if I were from the Make a Wish Foundation and were there to ask Kucinich to grow a third nut for me in the hope that the magnanimity of the gesture might send my mucopolysaccharidosis into remission. The congressman sighs and looks at his watch.

“I know, I know,” Jimenez says, like a ventriloquist.

“All right,” Kucinich says, weakly shaking my hand, “five minutes.”

“Well, actually,” I say, sitting down with him at the crooked picnic table, both of us moving slowly like two people lowering themselves onto either end of a seesaw, “I had been promised an interview with you on your way to the airport. All my questions are pretty long-winded, and five minutes isn’t enough time.”

“Oh, well, then let’s do that,” he says, calling past me to Jimenez. “He’s going to ride with me to the airport!” I turn to see Jimenez cup her ear. “He’s going to ride with me to the airport for his interview!” he shouts. “Put him in my car.” Jimenez nods.

“All right,” he says, looking at his watch again. “We got five minutes — do you have a short question?”

“Sure,” I say, taking a second to turn on my tape recorder. “What nonpolitical source material informs your idealism?”

I smile, waiting. He doesn’t answer me. “In other words,” I try again, “a lot of your ideas seem to stress the importance of peace and humanitarianism and, certainly, you can talk about those things as political ideals, but politics doesn’t really offer the best insight into those subjects. It’s like Richard Nixon’s peace sign, for example, meant something entirely different from John Lennon’s. Most people don’t look to politics to help them sustain their understanding of humanitarianism — they usually look to art and poetry and literature and philosophy. What are your cultural reference points?”

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next Page >>
 
  • passerby 03/18/2009 4:19:00 PM

    What is this garbage

  • MA 01/01/2008 12:54:00 AM

    Five minutes with Dennis Kucinich captured him completely (though I agree a bit self-indulgent and over-written). I have know Dennis half of his life-time and can vouch for the author's ability to capture his weird mix of populism, veganism, liberalism, any mysticism. Does it not seem like an odd combination of blue-collar, pro-labor Clevelander becoming darling of hard-left Hollywood? That's because Dennis is show biz all the way.

  • Crime Of The Scene 12/23/2007 7:22:00 PM

    I'm a Kucinich supporter and I found your blog to be exhaustive and masturbatory. Too many analogies and too many metaphors. This was really a blog/report about you. Your desperate need to inform the reader through pages of bored, festered ramblings of your poorly masked self-idolization and "intellect". You are a great writer. You know this and so do I. Anybody can see that. Got it. We know. The problem is that you spend seven and a half pages whining about your life and pontificating about how stupid a very brave man is, then you wrap it up in a bow with a very non-committal cop-out. You refuse to make any sense of what you have just put the reader through. We are simply left hanging. Some of us fist pumping, perhaps. Others like me are left pissed off. You would make a great politician. Your good at tearing someone down, slapping him around a little (because-no shit-a presidential candidate might be a little too busy for you between speeches and flights and the nerve-wracking nature of what he is trying to do) and running your bullying ass home to your turtle-neck collection. Shame on you for not even mentioning any positive initiatives he is supporting that would indeed make your like safer and healthier. I would list the many things that come to mind, but I'm quite sure you are aware of his positions. You just chose to attack without validation. You are a pundit. That is all. Good luck with that. (yawn...) ZZZZzzzzzzzz............ You need to get the fuck out of L.A. for awhile I think. I'm sorry to write this to you. I'm sure your otherwise quite a great person and passionate about what you do as you try to contribute to society the best you know how. But fuck, man. You could have written that blog in one page if you would have cut all the swill.

  • kent 12/20/2007 3:32:00 PM

    Dwayne Booth is a riot! "Dennis Kucinich..." was the most entertaining read of the year!

  • Ted 12/09/2007 6:51:00 AM

    The hundreds of millions of dollars being spent on all the presidential campaigns is behavior that many democrats and republicans believe one day will be illegal. We may be witnessing behavior today that will be punishable by law in the future. So a hopeful must default to likely criminal behavior and spend millions buying votes the same way auto companies sell American's their autos (with the worst milage in the world). I give kudos to Booth for stepping up to where our reporters need to be. In your face, demanding recognition of this absurd circus. No one dare tread there for fear of the status quo. He avoids the CNN smoke screen, the non-stop juggernaut that desperately masks the hideous junk culture we live in with it's oceanic appetite for our attention... which is precisely the same thing as our lives. All those millions for food, clothing and shelter instead going to ads and rhetoric that argue the silliest and most marginal of things when looked at with deep perspective. It's all fueled by the same thing that fuels all of our wars. A profound disconnect with the most relevant of truths.

  • Catherine Bae 12/08/2007 4:11:00 AM

    Kucinich is, and has been for his entire career, the one politician who has consistently put personal conviction and basic ethics before political gain. That is not to say that he is a saint and should be exempted from any critical view, but he (and the readers of LA Weekly) deserve a well thought-out treatment when the Weekly deems him important enough to be a cover story subject. But this article fails to deliver anything of substance. Instead one gets petty attacks and mean-spirited descriptions that only intend to caricaturize Kucinich and his supporters. In the end, this article makes the writer look almost as foolish as he wanted the subject to appear. Booth reveals himself as a self-absorbed, vindictive writer--someone so locked into his own intolerant, intellectually needy worldview that he's incapable of seeing Kucinich through anything but the cracked and narrow lens of his own character. Add to that the idiotic cover art and the monthly insult of plastic surgery ads--every week I have less reason to read your rag.

  • Matt Cornell 12/08/2007 1:19:00 AM

    Fish Shoots Democrat in a Barrel Dwayne Booth�s snide profile of Dennis Kucinich was the journalistic equivalent of kicking a puppy. But, the mean-spiritedness of the piece was only surpassed by its disingenuousness. For instance: was Booth really surprised that the candidate was cagey about answering loaded questions about �supporting the troops�, or that he might be too distracted at the airport to maintain a dialogue? And would Booth ever be able to gain the most minimal access to the more deserving targets of his scorn: the carefully stage-managed Clinton and Obama campaigns? Booth feigns political sophistication, but his real beef with the Congressman is that his earnest, old-fashioned ideas aren�t �hip� enough or �deep� enough for today�s electorate. Perhaps all Kucinich needs is some new duds from American Apparel and a photoshoot with the Cobrasnake. Would he then be �hip� enough to avoid the Weekly�s ridicule?

  • Gerard 12/05/2007 1:23:00 PM

    .....and I'm not an anonymous coward, sheesh!

  • LA Weekly Reader 12/05/2007 1:18:00 PM

    I would bet the many thousands of innocent Iraqi mothers, children and other civilians who've been murdered, accidentally killed or deemed worthy casualties of war might very much like to ask that same question. That it remains unanswered because it's too politically sensitive is just one more tough pill. Thanks for trying and keep it up!

  • dsaf 12/05/2007 6:49:00 AM

    sdkjfa

  • sadhana 12/05/2007 3:59:00 AM

    thank you for this enlightening article, the insight and courage to recognize the type of leader our country needs to implement restoration and healing so we may realign with our greatest potential and destiny. peace, love, happiness and prosperity.

  • LA Weekly Reader 12/05/2007 12:49:00 AM

    This reporter is so grossly full of himself and obscenely ill-mannered and mean spirited that I found nothing informative or of value in this article.

  • Mary Ann Cherry 12/04/2007 12:21:00 AM

    LA WEEKLY should be spanked for the cover photo. Just like CNN you are debasing our political process. I'm not going to vote for Kucinich, but come on... he's a presidential candidate and he deserves much better; your readers deserve better than this nonsense. Fish boy says: "Gravity, I figured, like democracy, always seemed quite capable of existing without my having to contribute any thought to it whatsoever." Well he has certainly not contributed any thought! Get him out of the way and put someone without so much ego in charge of unbiased political coverage. "Unbiased" is the word you're supposed to know when doing political reporting. I'm embarrassed for the whole bunch of you!

  • Ted O. 12/03/2007 11:35:00 PM

    FOOD FIGHT!!! These comments feel like a lopsided bar room brawl. Am I missing something??? This article posited some of the most profound questions one could ever ask a candidate. Who else is even coming close to asking questions like this? Even Kucinich himself expressed amazement at being asked REAL questions. - After the absurd behind the scenes roller coaster to the airport this piece afforded some fascinating insight into this candidate. Doesn't seem to count for squat to this hyper-condemning readership. Come on people lighten up. Sounds like a bit of rogue rage to me... which may be sometimes fair.... but this was a ballsy, fresh few minutes of conversation. Our context these days is so completely whacked we no longer have any bearing. Just because it's Kucinich and he says all the right things doesn't make the political context we've grown accustomed to swallowing any less tragic. As a result the piece left a combo of good and bad tastes in my mouth yet the belly laughs certainly helped maintain perspective. Thanks for the trip!

  • QT2no 12/03/2007 9:07:00 PM

    This is about the author, not the candidate, so rather than learn more about Kucinich as I'dhoped, I instead learned that as a journalist you get paid by the word, rather than good copy. Pity.

  • Pat 12/03/2007 8:19:00 PM

    Dwayne Booth should be ashamed of this type of reporting. It sounds like the National Inquirer style. Dennis Kucinich who I have heard speak many times, is the best candidate for President in 2008 to turn this country to a much needed new direction. Since your readers can't depend on reporting with integrity, they should make an effort to hear the Dennis Kucinich themselves.

  • Jim NunyaDam 12/03/2007 6:03:00 AM

    WOW. The author needs to run to Wal-Mart and pick up some tampons because it's DEFINITELY that time of the month! I haven't heard cheaper, flimsier, more flippant insults since the last time I turned on Fox. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. --Mohandas Gandhi Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. --Albert Einstein

  • BGCee 12/03/2007 2:28:00 AM

    It is Sunday December 2. Los Angeles is covered with CHEMTRAILS. Please refer to this article: Rep Kucinich Rewrites HR 2977 - 'Chemtrails' disappear. http://www.rense.com/general19/kucinich.htm Obviously Kucinich knows something about the blatant extreme weather modification operations that have been occurring since 1999, and he's not talking about it. Nor is the LA Weekly, LA Times, 60 Minutes, Time or Newsweek, and a whole host of entities that SHOULD be investigating and reporting on this!

  • eden 12/02/2007 11:50:00 PM

    last night i was coming home from some club at 3 am an had to wait for the bus. i picked up the L.A. Weekly because I thought..."this paper is cool. i'll read it." I started reading the Kucinich article...1)Are all your writers a piece of shit? 2) Every other sentence was an insult in some way. 3) I'm serious. Are all your writers a piece of shit???

  • sammy farhan 12/02/2007 3:50:00 PM

    The article is so far left, that the lefties think it right. Mr.Booth is not a politician. He is a writer. Leave the repetition of mundane talking points to zombie journalist. Kucinich comes off as an honest man caught up in a corrupted occupation. We need Mr. Booth to interview ALL the canidates! That would really be interesting.

  • Cathy 12/02/2007 3:12:00 PM

    In response to your article, you said it best... You are truly an "asshole".

  • Cindy 12/02/2007 2:51:00 PM

    Are you with the Third Reich? Someday what you've written here is going to come back to haunt you, mentally as well as karmically, because you are crucifying a man who is good, honest and ethical. Shame on you for what you wrote and for printing that slanderous illustration. If you want to go after someone, go after the criminals running our country, who have been holding the White House and the American people hostage for the past 7 years. Go after the guys who are responsible for starting a war based on lies, killing millions of Iraqi citizens, torturing prisoners to DEATH, and robbing us of our Constitutional Rights in the U.S. I believe someday those responsible will be tried for war crimes. Some courts in other countries have already deemed them as criminals. It is probably pointless to tell you these things, because after reading your article, it is clear that you are out-of-touch with reality. The fact that your article was even printed by LA Weekly tells me the Editors are out-of-touch as well. Shame, shame on all of you.

  • William Broen 12/02/2007 5:14:00 AM

    This issue was the most crass piece of tabloid journalism that I have seen in a long time. I was at the Dennis Kucinich event in Sierra Madre and my version of events is extremely differant from the reporters. The part that got to me the most is how he trashed this boy who sang a beautiful song that he wrote about peace. This boy put his heart into this song only to have it snidely trashed by this jaded egotistical reporter. The reporter already had an agenda. The ridiculous questions he wanted to ask look silly when you compare them to Kucinich's record. Consider: Dennis Kucinich is the ONLY democratic candidate to consistantly vote against the war and the erosion of our bill of rights, the ONLY candidate to support single payer health care, the ONLY candidate to support gay marraige (besides Gravel), and the ONLY candidate who is working to impeach Dick Cheney. The L.A. Weekly is quickly becoming an irrelevant tabloid supported by "vaginal rejuvination" ads. As a previous poster said, maybe you should stick to writing articles about Brittany.

  • artimus Kantanquer 12/02/2007 12:38:00 AM

    If Mr. Booth had spent as much time reporting on Kucinich, as he does on beating his own drum - we might learn something about the candidate. As it is, we learn more about the reporter which is possibly just what Mr. Booth wanted in the first place.

  • Jack DeBain 12/01/2007 1:32:00 PM

    I echo the sentiment above: Where are you, Michael Ventura? The LA Weekly is no more. This article proves it. Yes, I am voting for Kucinich. So many people I speak with say first that he has no chance, then admit that, yes, he is the only one voicing their beliefs. If we all vote for the candidate who most closely stands up for our own personal values Kucinich stands a chance. I am voting for Kucinich. Look where voting for the safe bet has gotten us? Hillary Clinton follows in the line of Dukakis and Mondale. The safe bet takes us further to the right.

  • Sharon Jimenez 12/01/2007 8:01:00 AM

    Dwayne Dearest, All week long my phone rings and I hear the question, �are you upset or angry or hurt over the article in the LA Weekly?� I reply, �I laughed until my shoulder pads flew off!" By the way, they were plucked from a Joan Collins estate sale. The 80's are back with a vengence, doll! When you share the same first name as the late great Duane/Dwayne Allman, and write your frenetic prose like a ressurection of Lester Bangs morphed with Chandra Wilson; with brilliant illustrations that would make R.Crumb wish he had never left America-- How can I not appreciate the gifts of Dwayne Booth A.K.A. The Fish? The Tuna casserole perfume was compliments of Tom Ford. The N.O.W. would serve you up in an Elvis remake of Clam Bake on that one�after all it was Black Orchid. Yes, and about Dennis Kucinich, your "Coppertone Man" cover illustration, will hopefully bring your readers to your last paragraph 'endorsement' of the best candidate in the race for the presidency. Peace and Cheers for the Laughs! Happy Holidays! Sharon Jimenez, Icon Imaging PR Kucinich for President 2008

  • Tom McKenzie 11/30/2007 11:32:00 PM

    Comparing your interview style to that of Bill Moyers is a crime worse that forgery. I disliked your story on Dennis Kucinich a great deal�perhaps because I took it in a serious context. Your mean spirited and self-absorbed "expose" failed to be a decent piece of journalism because you reported all the wrong things. You glossed over the event you were covering with superficial reflections revealing your prejudicial bias against your subject, and you lace your writing with an overdose of toxic similes. Your statement that you pursued an interview "for the purpose of understanding his politics" is disingenuous, as you are a cartoonist and lampooner who shouldn't confuse your subjects and readers by masquerading as a journalist. In a publication that has diverged so far from its roots of providing comprehensive analysis of the full field of political candidates, I question the motives of the LA Weekly editors.

  • Margarita 11/30/2007 10:53:00 PM

    Great piece. Difficult subject. I've always wondered what was really at the heart/in the heart of a politician. On the one hand, you've got to play the game. On the other, there had to be some sort of idealism somewhere once that pushed you in that direction. After a while, though, are you just telling yourself the story you want to believe about yourself or is there still some objectivity? Can there be? Thanks, again, for this article.

  • Michael 11/30/2007 9:48:00 PM

    I read this in the paper version but am taking the time to comment online because I was dismayed that this pathetic level of journalism would find its way into the L.A. Weekly. The self centeredness and self righteousness of the "journalist" who wrote this piece, knows no bounds. He pretends to represent the millions of readers of the L.A. Weekly, yet truely only represents his fragile ego. Mr. Kucinich's answers were straight and to the point and too bad if they don't fit the narrow and negative paradigm of the author. I will also take you to task for all the nasty comic depictions of Dennis all over the cover and the article. Dennis Kucinich is not a unicorn riding idealist as this article writer would have the public think. He stood up to corporate robber barrons in the city of Cleveland Ohio on my behalf (as a constituent), to the detriment of his personal career. That is a man of action and conviction. L.A. Weekly doesn't represent itself, its reader, or anyone other than the weakness of the author with pathetic works of faux journalism like this.

  • Leo de Vogel 11/30/2007 9:40:00 PM

    I used to read the LA Weekly before it was bought by big mainstream media. The typical snide meanspirited hatchetjob you did on 5 minutes with Dennis Kucinich is something we might find uttered by FOX News or CNN luminaries but I guess that's to expected when you become part of the Murdoch conglomerate. The pox on you and your lamebrained "reporters".

  • Francis Jay Caputo 11/30/2007 7:37:00 PM

    The author pretends to be an intellectual with a clever sense of humor but actually seems more like an angry, cynical, sexually frustrated adolescent who is completely blind to the nuanced interconnectedness between contemporary society and historical social evolution and who is taking out his frustrations on the weakest of the heard - the equivalent of being a journalistic hyena.

  • Alma Kesling 11/30/2007 7:35:00 PM

    I'm baffled at the disrespect shown to candidate for President Kucinich. I doubt Mitt Romney or Hillary Clinton would be portrayed in such a manner on the cover of your magazine. From this to questions about how he got Elizabeth, the disrepect shown by the media to Dennis Kucinich is appalling and ENOUGH already!

  • Old Mother Riley 11/30/2007 3:57:00 PM

    I'd have to ask sayuncle. Children? Innocent? All of them? You react the way most Americans do. Just the question about where a soldier's duty to their country and their duty to humanity begin and end evokes this knee-jerk reaction. Support the troops. Support the troops. Support the troops. I can see millions of people with their fingers in their ears, their eyes closed, repeating this phrase and waiting for the question to go away. Of course there are soldiers in Iraq simply fighting for the person next to them, shooting back at the people who are shooting at them and just trying to get home. That's the scope of their involvement. My bumper sticker would say "I empathize with the troops" but the idea of blindly supporting any group doing something wrong has to at least be questioned. Can't anybody simply ask the question? If you believe what the US military is doing over there is not wrong, then make your point and that is a discussion. Kucinich himself says what the military is doing is wrong. So Booth asks if the people doing it are wrong? Are only soldiers over 30 wrong? Only the soldiers with college degrees responsible? Maybe a combination of at least 30 college credits and 25 years or older should be held accountable? Or is the uniform enough to get your approval for anything? Criminal as a group, innocent as individuals, where does that leave us? I'll say again that it seems a compliment to Kucinich that the interviewer had the hope that Kucinich was smart and sincere enough for Booth to expect an answer. OK, he couldn't get one. Kucinich, in the end is still a politician. Asking Clinton, Edwards or Obama the same question obviously would have been a waste of time. It was worth a try with Kucinich. Please Dwayne Booth, keep asking the question no matter how many people miss the point and try to shout you down.

  • terrence Bennett 11/30/2007 9:03:00 AM

    dwayne booth: I was at the sierra madre park event which you so turgidly fail to describe with any feel for the actual events. you are so massively full of your own midget imo intellect that you totally fail to interact with the man you are there to relate to. you are a true turd blossom and an embarrassment to the rag you scribble for.

  • sayuncle 11/30/2007 8:12:00 AM

    I read the entire article. I printed it out for later use. I'll tell you that use later. Read General Sun Tsu. It is a book written in the 6th century used as instruction at Westpoint. If you read this incredible book, you will find the soldiers first duty is to peace, not war. Soldiers are not well schooled and wise old adults, they are our children, some are just out of high school. We spend our lives keeping them safe and innocent. We teach them the golden rule, morality, to get along with others. Then we send them into a hell we call war. Our children. This is how we can support our troops, our children, and be against the war. What sane parent would not be? Dennis Kucinich Rocks! Take the time to watch and listen to him. Read the material. Get involved in the grass roots movement to get him elected. www.kucinich.uc Now about the special use of the article I printed out. I'm using it to wipe my ass. That's all it's worth. ~sayuncle

  • LA Weekly Reader 11/30/2007 7:52:00 AM

    what?

  • Old Mother Riley 11/30/2007 7:16:00 AM

    I liked the article. I seems like most of the Weekly's readers came to this article with certain expectations, the same expectations that I imagine the author had as well. Now everyone's disappointed. As for Mr. Booth's questions, good for him! Did every one want him to asked "What is your position on renewable energy sources?" just so we could read that part of Kucinich's stump speech again. Granted Kucinich has better ideas than Romney, but the answer would have been canned and old news. "Kucinich in favor of alternate energy sources!" "LA Weekly scoops the NY Times!" Hurray. Booth goes straight for Kucinich's hypocrisy, again the least nauseating hypocrisy of any candidate, but hypocrisy just the same. "If the occupation is criminal, how can you support the people committing the crime?" Fair question. Of course he didn't answer the question. Sure the author sounds a little pissed off. I was too. His questions were thoughtful and designed to make it clear to Kucinich that if he was saving the really good stuff for someone a little deeper than Wolf Blitzer, this was his chance. Did Mr. Booth try too hard? Maybe but I saw it as a compliment to Kucinich and a sign of the author hoping against hope for the thoughtful guy in the Democratic field to be thoughtful. I have no doubt the Mr. Booth would have accurately reported all the deep truth and insight Kucinich cared to impart, there just wasn't any that day. I will admit the some of the swipes Booth took at Kucinich smack of kicking a man when he's dull if all of the other readers of the article will admit that the description of Denise looking like he combed his hair with a buttered roll is just a great line.

  • tom carney 11/30/2007 6:38:00 AM

    Thanks! loving us -tom

  • notfromaroundhere 11/30/2007 5:30:00 AM

    how many of your cute rambling thoughtstreams do we have to endure to get to the substance of this article?

  • Davis22 11/30/2007 5:22:00 AM

    Best article Ive read in years about politicians. Im disturbed at the contempt that many posters have exhibited. Has smart,creative and humorous writing become verboten? I am voting for Kucinich. This article doesnt change that. It does, however, change my oppinion about the "alternative" press. I now believe there is hope for critical thinkers to present ideas beyond the norm. "Hooray" for the Weekly! thank you for a fantastic article!

  • Gregorio 11/30/2007 2:31:00 AM

    This is the most pathetic, self-indulgent, benighted smear piece I have ever seen. The standards of the Federalist Society have seriously eroded not just in matters of truth and perspective, but in avoidance of turgid prose expressing breath-taking lack of propriety, as if it were real. This is indeed the style of the literary and moral homunculi who haunt the blogosphere in the name of Republicanism, another free-market jackal.

  • Pat Collins 11/30/2007 12:31:00 AM

    I worked for Kucinich last time around, so I have a good sense of humor about him. But the only thing I want to ask after reading 2 pages of this article is, how many words can you cram into one sentence? Learn to write, dude.

  • Jacksonian 11/29/2007 11:27:00 PM

    An afterthought now that I've read the other comments... I was stunned to see the level of contempt this article evoked! One reader objects to Booth's "cleverness;" another takes him to task for "baiting" Kucinich; another castigates him for the Bill Moyer allusion. It seems to me these critics just don't get it. First Booth IS clever, but not in an "in-your-face" kind of way, and not in a "sophomoric" or "pseudo intellectual" manner either. What his writing reflects is PERSPECTIVE, literary, historical, cultural; and what it reveals is not a blowhard at work but a mind at work. Good writing is thought provoking and should challenge us. Asking Kucinich to balance, on the one hand, his opposition to the war with, on the other, his support of the troops engaged in the war, was not baiting him: This is a legitimate question which needs exploration because there IS an element of both irony & incongruity to the two positions; also, couldn't we ask this question of the ENTIRE Democratic field of candidates and at least one of the Republican hopefuls (Ron Paul)? It seems to me that the "baiting" criticism was nothing more than a knee-jerk reaction from a rabid Kucinich supporter; it had all the nuance and legitimacy one could expect from an indignant true believer. By far the dullest response among many came from the writer who wanted to "slap" Booth for his reference to Bill Moyer. Go back and read the article again: Far from being "pretentious," Booth's style here is self-depracating and humorous. Not only is the irony of the exchange funny, Booth intentionally (and, yes, cleverly) reveals his values: Rather than comparing himself favorably with Moyers, he ASPIRES to a Moyersesque approach, thus informing the reader of the standards to which he holds himself. It strikes me that much of the criticism of this article stems from its rise above the usual stultefyingly simplistic reportage we've come to expect in our dumbed-down culture. Apparently, writing above the sixth-grade level is not only offensive to some people but also threatening.

  • ProudPrimate 11/29/2007 11:23:00 PM

    I've got to page 4 and learned the lesson of this article: Dennis knows when to terminate an interview that is going nowhere, precisely because the interviewer needs something tittilating to write for his oh, so hip clientele, not because he really fails to understand that the culpability of the military grunts and of society at large is "the small dust of the balance", something for quibblers to quibble about, compared to the real issue, the real criminals, which have been lulling the public to sleep for over a century, but for whom the press is mar more to blame in its complicity than the rank and file soldier. Of all issues, the most important is for those grunts and those plebs to confront the fact that Machiavelli rules, and that the government lies to its people as a first resort. The exceptions are rare, and often lead to assassinations of those bold few. Only by educating the masses can the real problem be solved. Distractions like this article are not, in my view, paying into that common cause.

  • Jacksonian 11/29/2007 9:50:00 PM

    What a great article! Booth's candid, witty, probing style flies in the face of conventional political reporting and strives for a more profound level of candidate inquiry. The author's descriptive narrative on the complexities of pinning down his elusive subject, juxtaposed as it is with his own political angst and perceived shortcomings, breathes life into what would be an otherwise run-of-the mill reporting task. Bravo on an excellent story!

  • Paul Lacques 11/29/2007 9:49:00 PM

    Hello? Hello? I'd have hung up too. What a load of lightweight, intellectually pretentious, egotistical, and pointless questions. Great idea--bait the only progressive candidate in America. Did Jill Stewart plant her hate lefties chip in the L.A. Weekly staff brain? Nice self flattery on being mistaken for Tom Tomorrow. Fat chance. Tom Tomorrow has wit, insight, and concern for humanity. Is it just me, or do most L.A. Weekly writers these days talk about themselves to an inappropriate degree in their articles? Where have you gone, Michael Ventura?

  • LA Weekly Reader 11/29/2007 8:46:00 PM

    ?

  • Joeann 11/29/2007 8:19:00 PM

    DENNIS KUCINICH FOR PRESIDENT THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO CAN SAVE AMERICA. By the way you and your article are a complete waste of time.

  • Mary Jacobs 11/29/2007 8:03:00 PM

    All I want for Christmas is for Dennis Kucincich to be President! Please go to his website, Dennis4president.com and make a contrbution to peace on earth and good will towards men. Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall elect Kucinich! IF you want to get involved in the grassroots campaign, please contact me at votedennis@aol.com and visit the website, KucinichOutreach.com for flyers on thte issues and a schedule of his and Elizabeth's visits here in LA. They will be arriving on a Peace on Earth Train at Union Station on Dec. 23 at 12 Noon. Be there! Greet them! Get your cars painted free- give me a call! 323 260-4895 for a "beauty appointment" for your car, truck or van. I pay for the paint and the art work.

  • Dolly Lanna 11/29/2007 7:28:00 PM

    Your ramblings are stupid and disgusting and sophomoric.. Kucinich is a person with honesty and integrity and says what the American People really want from their President and idiots like you who are practicing their writing one liners and put downs to make you seem oh so cool are just disgusting. And by the way WRONG AND STUPID. You are part of the problem and you do not know what you are talking about. Go write about Britney for Gawd's sake.

  • Terrible 11/29/2007 6:29:00 PM

    At least after all your wasteful harrassment you finally reach a logical conclusion!

  • Betty Hall 11/29/2007 4:09:00 PM

    There are no answers to such an intellectual prig as Dwayne that would be meaningful to ANYBODY nor I expect any questions that he could pose that would be worth asking. What garbage!

  • HDBiker 11/29/2007 3:08:00 PM

    Too bad I wasted six min. on this piece of trash "reporting"

  • norcal 11/29/2007 2:56:00 PM

    What a bloated excuse for gonzo journalism. The author could have done a better story with half the words, using the same basic material, but eliminating all the chaff about---himself. He's not interesting. His tangents aren't interesting. Pointing out Kucinich's hypocrisies--maybe interesting. But the 'how can you support the troops' question was really a lame one. Was that the best Booth could do? Couldn't he come up with any other more substantial example of Kucinich's essential lightweightness as a potential leader of the up-to-now most powerful nation on earth? Please. Kucinich has a lot of silly, untenable positions (his veganism, for one, which many of us couldn't possibly adhere to healthfully). I can't even start. This troops question is just a canard, and it dooms the piece. Get an editor for this guy.

  • sydney 11/29/2007 1:38:00 PM

    I would lable this "interview" as "sophomoric" and out of touch with the world beyond the interviewer's ego.

  • Bob 11/29/2007 9:54:00 AM

    Now, this article is a real waste of time. I've read three pages, and I'm stopping now. I'm not much of a fan of Dennis K, but I do think that I start reading an article that purports to be an interview with him, I should get some content that helps me flesh out my opinion of him, NOT of the interviewer. Oh, as to my opinion of the interviewer: full of himself, intellectually snobbish, too fond of the clever use of language (as opposed to clarity of exposition), and seriously in the grip of if-it-happened-before-I-was-born-it-can't-be-very-important thinking. I tell you, bud, I'm 60 now. Back in the 60's, I suffered from some of the same intellectual afflictions; but I was never as stupid as you.

  • Bob Oltmans 11/29/2007 7:49:00 AM

    This article should be titled: Off The Track- 5 Metaphors Only (Please!)

  • Jason 11/29/2007 6:41:00 AM

    Boy oh boy...you sure do like being clever. I have to learn to skim faster.

  • Paulv 11/29/2007 2:42:00 AM

    I'm not the biggest fan of Kucinich, but Jesus, you are a such a pretentious little snot. The way you said: �All my questions are conversational � they�re Bill Moyer questions.� made me want to slap you. Moyer, unlike you, isn't a hack. Moyer can write better than a high school freshman. Moyer would only need 5 minutes - and wouldn't act like a spoiled child if he was expecting more. After having to deal with Hannah Storm's CBS interview, and now your own pseudo-intellectual drivel - it's a wonder Kucinich can keep himself from assuming the worse about America.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy