Top

news

Stories

 

Tennie Pierce Gets $1.43 Million

Actual cost to taxpayers is higher than last November’s controversial deal

CITY ATTORNEY ROCKY DELGADILLO opted against trial today and settled the lawsuit filed by black firefighter Tennie Pierce for $1.43 million, with Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and city council members signing off on the agreement hours after the council meeting was finished and no apparent action had been taken.

“Today’s agreement is the best possible outcome for the taxpayers,” said the mayor in a press statement. “It reduces the original settlement by nearly half, while protecting Angelenos from further liability.” But in fact, with City Hall already paying outside lawyers to prepare to fight Pierce in court, the total price to taxpayers is slightly higher than last November’s proposed settlement, by roughly $100,000.

Pierce had sued, claiming racial harassment among other things, after a colleague slipped dog food into his spaghetti following a volleyball game in which Pierce repeatedly joked “Feed the big dog!” in reference to himself. An L.A. Weekly investigation found no evidence of a racial component, racial comments or other racial undercurrents surrounding the prank.

Noticeably absent from the City Council meeting today was Council Member Dennis Zine, who was strongly opposed to any settlement offers. Zine had told the L.A. Weekly, “The truth of the matter is Pierce is a prankster and a hazer and doesn’t deserve anything on this case.”

The announcement set off immediate debate. City Council President Eric Garcetti promptly took credit for helping broker the deal, which he praised. But an attorney representing Pierce’s two Fire Department supervisors, who were disciplined for allegedly failing to fully investigate the prank against Pierce by a Latino co-worker after Pierce taunted him during the volleyball game, told KFI radio in disgust: “There was no racial component; it was entirely made up.”

Pierce filed a lawsuit in 2005 alleging that he was fed dog food by his co-workers at Los Angeles city Fire Station 5. Last fall, the City Council agreed to pay Pierce $2.7 million in public funds, but the controversial settlement was scuttled after photos emerged showing Pierce spraying water into the face of one strapped-down firefighter, smearing shaving cream around the groin area of another strapped-down firefighter, and gleefully laughing at a third who had been wrapped in a bed sheet on which hazers had scrawled, “Oy Vey! I’m Gay!”

Pierce’s lawsuit had been scheduled for trial on September 24. Instead, a statement was released by Los Angeles City Clerk Frank Martinez at 4:30 p.m. today stating that Pierce will receive an additional $60,000 to resolve claims for back pay. The deal will also make him eligible for his 20-year pension, which is estimated at roughly another $1 million. As part of the settlement, Pierce will resign from the department and not file any further claims against the city. The City Attorney’s Office has already spent $1.35 million defending the case.

By contrast, City Council voted on September 19 to pay $1.15 million to the family of a 26-year-old Glendale motorcyclist who died when he was struck by a car driven by a Los Angeles city employee.

 
  • Bummer 10/03/2007 4:47:00 AM

    Christine, Too bad about that annoying little EEOC report. Read it yet? So maybe a few LAFD actually have valid claims. How are you going to spin that?

  • LA Weekly Reader 09/28/2007 1:29:00 AM

    This case was a joke, but there are plenty more that are not

  • Bill S. 09/26/2007 4:46:00 AM

    Pierce filed a claim. You can debate whether it was racial or not, but the fact is: you - as an employee - are allowed to make a claim againt your employer. The LAFD can't come after you for it, can't lie and cover it up. They did. They're responsible. That was the case, Mike. Hate to break it to you. And they admitted to it. Did Pelisek mention that? Hmmm. She must have forgotten. She does that a lot.

  • mike 09/26/2007 3:58:00 AM

    doesn't make giving a fraud over a million dollars for some bites of dog food any more acceptable.

  • mike 09/26/2007 3:51:00 AM

    maybe arevalo had a history of walking around his house nude? you can make whatever wild claims you want, doesn't make giving a fraud over a million dollars for some bites of dog food. tenny was involved in the same kind of racial pranks he claimed to be the victim of. that's not some random accusation, there's pictures that prove it. i still don't understand how the hell any rational person can defend pierce and the idiocy of l.a. gov't.

  • Hmmmm.... 09/25/2007 5:28:00 AM

    Did you ever consider the case wasn't as strong as Pelisek distorted it to look? Let's see: the City thought so, the new lawyers thought so, 2 mock juries thought so. And maybe Arevalo had a history of racist comments? Just a thought. She's at the Weekly for a reason.

  • susan 09/24/2007 3:16:00 AM

    The last paragraph of the article puts this sorry saga into perspective: the life of a man who was killed was worth less than Tennie Pierce's claim that he was singled out for his race on a prank, just because the dead guy's family didn't have a race card to play or an aggressive lawyer. This is wrong on many levels -- and the two Hispanic colleagues who were disciplined, and have negatives in their personnel records now, also have lawyers? They were all equally guilty of this "hazing," which was tasteless all around. One thing for fratboys, but these supposed professionals should know better in this day and age, that anything mentioning sexual orientation or race (which wasn't referred to with Pierce at all) is taboo. That means that if every single firefighter wanted to, they'd have equal basis for suing the city: which is none. Glad that Barry is finally putting a firm "no tolerance" policy into place to stop this fraud. As for the detail that this actually cost the city more than the former settlement offer: that would have made the city pick up Pierce's own attorney fees, so at least, the principle that the city isn't liable was more protected here. The real problem is that Rocky felt if his office did take it to trial, they could lose to the tune of the $7 million paid out to lesbian firefighter Brenda Lee. If he can't handle any trial, even when the evidence is this strong, what use ie he? A rhetorical question -- why the Council went to outside counsel. Another question: Why WEREN'T Zine and Smith at the vote, when they'd adamently opposed settling? They made Rosendahl and Weiss take the heat as the only no votes. At least those two had the guts to vote their conscience.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy