Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

Most Popular

Reader's Picks

Top Recommendations

A short list of Los Angeles's most popular hot spots.
user content provided by: LikeMe.net & LA Weekly

SLIDESHOWS

National Features >

  • Miami New Times

    Dwyane's Disaster

    The Miami Heat superstar sure picked an airball for a business partner.

    By Gus Garcia-Roberts

  • Houston Press

    The Hostage

    Larry Plake went to work on an oil barge and ended up held for ransom in the Nigerian jungle.

    By Chris Vogel

  • Riverfront Times

    Extreme Makeover: All-Star Edition

    St. Louis is cleaning house for baseball's mid-summer classic. But is it too late?

    By Keegan Hamilton

Rock & Roll Love Letter print | email | write comment

Be Social

  • rss

Dylan Goes Gay for Guillen

Eternal collective consciousness holds breath

Kate Sullivan

Published on September 07, 2006

When it comes to Bob Dylan’s discography, I only listen to Blood on the Tracks, so prolly I’m not a true fan. You figure Blood on the Tracks is the Dylan album for people who don’t really like Dylan. It’s the Dylan album you’d take home to meet your mom. Just about as smart, lovable, melodic and warm as a record could be (with the exception of “The Jack of Hearts,” which sounds increasingly like a not-very-good Traveling Wilburys joint).

I am, however, a Beatles (and Bowie) fan, and so am deeply, happily indebted to Dylan. It is certain that John Lennon and Co. would never have reached such rarefied lyrical dimensions without the inspiration (and competition, in a way) of Dylan. You know, Dylan — and his pot. Still, I can’t understand why people — critics especially! — feel the need to behave as if Dylan is still writing music on par with his best stuff. Rolling Stone just gave his perfectly lovely new record, Modern Times, five stars. (Granted, Rolling Stone is notorious for misusing its star system in these sorts of situations. That last Mick Jagger record got five too!) But in general there’s an intellectual shame zone surrounding anything Dylan related with many music critics. You must worship, or — what? Look dumb?

Nothing personal, but I can’t imagine anything off this record living in the eternity of the collective consciousness. And that’s okay, you know? I don’t need this to be a five-star album. And I don’t need to pretend that it is. His lyrics are great at times, but when it comes to inventing bizarre new song structures, indelible melodic hooks, new ways of knowing the universe and coining phrases to ignite the imaginations of millions, I think Dylan’s done his part. More than his part.

Mostly, this album is a sort of easygoing boogie-woogie-blues-lite vehicle for its lyrics. (Although the mysterious torch ballad “Nettie Moore,” with its oddball time signatures and deliciously romantic/domestic lyrics, is all right . . . “A lifetime with you is like some heavenly day . . .”) Mostly, the melodies wash through the mind like clean water and leave no mark. Obviously, there are no vocal harmonies, and Dylan’s voice, so naked and alone, reminds me of gray rock salt. Lonely gray rock salt. For a lot of people, all that’s enough. (But see, that’s why I ?am a Beatles person and not a Dylan one. At the end of the day, I gots to have my pop thrills. Some call them cheap, but they are priceless.)

This record is the sound of a man living on (“ain’t talkin’/just walkin’?”); a troubadour who’s in it for the long haul, decades past even needing to make that searing, momentary-but-timeless mark in the sky. I doubt you’ll actually hear a workingman on the Metro Blue Line at 6 in the morning humming the tune to the new ditty, “Workingman’s Blues #2.” But so what? As I said, Bob Dylan has given us enough to hum.

But. When he starts complaining about the decline of popular music, saying that it’s lost its “stature” (as he said to RS), it feels a bit disingenuous. This is the same guy who gave “The Times They Are A-Changin’ ” to TV ads for Kaiser Permanente — which is, as you know, a terrible, heartless corporate HMO. Talk about workingman’s blues. Talk to the families of working people who’ve suffered (and died) because Kaiser denied them the transplants they needed.

I have to wonder: Would Woody Guthrie have sold “This Land Is Your Land” to an image-boosting ad campaign for, I don’t know, the Beef Council or Big Tobacco? Maybe. I kinda doubt it. (I am quite certain Guthrie would have done a Victoria’s Secret ad. Silly little men.)

It’s Dylan’s right to do whatever the fuck he wants with his own art, of course! But it’s a bit tacky to put such a low price on that art, and then bitch about how music today has become devalued in the culture. You can’t have it both ways. And I’m not saying it’s wrong or bad to sell songs to ads. I’m just saying, as I seem to say every week, that there are cool and uncool ways to do it.

Some music becomes sanctified over time by the collective idealism and love of many human beings. In a way, it becomes something that’s a part of all of us. I saw Dylan perform his old hits, including “Blowin’ in the Wind,” 12-odd years ago on a sweltering night in Prague, his first tour behind the former Iron Curtain. Fat grown men wept and sweated in the uncooled, enclosed sports arena, and cigarettes glowed in the dark as several thousand baby boomers (they had their own postwar boom over there too, you know) met their own tragic youth face to face. I had heard stories about Dylan’s dreadful live shows, but he performed that night with a realness, a respect for the audience and the songs, that was totally unjaded. He seemed to understand that the songs had taken on a big, beautiful life apart from him in the East, and he seemed to embrace it. He let them have their Dylan moment that night. He let the songs be holy.

1   2   Next Page »