Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

Most Popular

SLIDESHOWS

National Features >

  • City Pages

    Michele Bachmann, Unmuzzled

    You don't need to read Sarah Palin's book to hear the ravings of a mad woman.

    By Matt Snyders

  • Miami New Times

    Pimp Daddy

    The rise and fall of a chubby sex-cult leader.

    By Natalie O'Neill

  • Riverfront Times

    Babe 'n' Arms

    Tom was a hot-tempered cross-dresser with a garage full of guns--and then he became Rachel.

    By Nicholas Phillips

  • Dallas Observer

    The Fight for Texas

    Rick Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchison are locked in a battle over the soul of the GOP. They're also running for governor.

    By Sam Merten

Be Social

  • rss

A Foot in Each World

Don Siegel’s pockmarked and picaresque career

Scott Foundas

Published on July 21, 2005

image
UCLA Arts Library Special Collections
Directors, it is said, “sign” their names to their work. For Don Siegel — the subject of a UCLA Film and Television Archive retrospective running through August 7 — that was literally the case. From 1973 on, the words “a Siegel film” appeared at the start of his pictures, scrawled on the screen in an elegant cursive script. But long before then, Siegel was making his mark on movies in other, less obvious ways — even if 36 features in 35 years, most made on assignment and some on schedules of as little as nine days, makes for a trail even Harry Callahan might have a tough time following. Like those other titans of American B movies who arrived at roughly the same moment — Sam Fuller, Budd Boetticher and Andre de Toth — Siegel’s is a career void of either the luxury or the inclination to take long intervals, waiting for inspiration (or good material) to arrive. “In the motion picture business,” Siegel wrote in a posthumously published memoir that is among the most honest and entertaining of show-biz biographies, “you soon learn to slip the punches, or you’re not around very long feeling sorry for yourself.” Words worthy of a Siegel protagonist — terse, wily men of action who, be they cop or crook, lover or fighter, cowboy or Indian, often find themselves with one foot planted in each of two opposing worlds.

Though he is best known for his collaborations with Clint Eastwood (including Dirty Harry, Coogan’s Bluffand Escape From Alcatraz) and a science-fiction classic (Invasion of the Body Snatchers) about the ease with which we might lose our humanity, Siegel first garnered attention in the late 1930s and early ’40s as an editor and, later, an assistant director under contract to Warner Brothers, where he would direct his first two features: TheVerdict(1946) and NightUntoNight(1947). What follows is pocked by inconsistency. Siegel himself had little regard for the Cold War shenanigans of NoTimeForFlowers(1952) or the exotic romance of SpanishAffair(1957), while late in his career he became involved in two troubled, high-profile productions whose fortunes are aptly summarized by their titles: RoughCut(1980) and Jinxed!(1982).

But it’s worth remembering that not even every Picasso is a masterpiece, and if we limit ourselves to Siegel’s strongest work, we still have RiotinCellblock11(1954), an entirely unconventional prison picture in which the inmates and warden work together toward a shared understanding, only to be undone by a bureaucracy beyond their control; BabyFaceNelson(1957), with its astonishing Mickey Rooney performance — Siegel was particularly good at casting against type — and a bullet-riddled romanticism that anticipates BonnieandClyde;the unsentimental battlefield camaraderie of HellisForHeroes(1962); and Madigan(1968), a coarse-grained police story whose eponymous detective feels closer to the lowlifes he patrols than to the wife he supposedly loves.

It was the enormous success of the Eastwood pictures that finally bought Siegel a greater degree of artistic autonomy. Eastwood was himself party to TheBeguiled(1970), as the wounded Union solider convalescing in a Confederate girls school where more than the students’ chastity is kept under lock and key. It was an astonishing Southern gothic — sexy, terrifying and unexpectedly lyrical — and one saw the hand of the former editor in its elegant montage sequences. CharleyVarrick(1972) was greater still, a picaresque heist caper with a smirking antihero whose motto — “Last of the Independents” — might have been Siegel’s own. Which may explain why Charley is one of the few Siegel characters allowed to meet a happy end.

There are not many today who approach Siegel’s narrative speed, choreography of screen action or preference for bandits more brutal than gentlemanly. Not that many even seem to be trying. But this is exactly the sort of filmography that should inspire others to forgery.


DONSIEGEL| At UCLA Film and Television Archive | Through August 7 | www.cinema.ucla.edu