By Sherrie Li
By Falling James
By Amanda Lewis
By Amy Nicholson
By Amy Nicholson
By Jennifer Swann
By Scott Foundas
By Sherrie Li
The arrival of Jonathan Mostow’s Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines heralds a welcome, if inevitably momentary, respite from this unhappy summer of unequal and/or unworthy sequels — one so satisfying that it nearly (but not quite) makes up for all the dreck we’ve slogged through along the way. Here is the first movie of its kind in many moons that doesn’t have to labor, Hulk- or Charlie’s Angels–style, over convincing you of how entertaining it is. Here’s a picture that you actually want to see a second time, not for the sake of further wrapping your head around its gnarly conceptual matrix, but because of the sheer visceral charge it provides. Here, at long last, is a summer movie — like its precursors in the Terminator canon — worth its weight in cybernetic organisms.
Released in 1984, The Terminator— with its crudely elegant stop-motion effects by Stan Winston — was a crackerjack specimen of lyrical, bargain-basement sci-fi on the run, revving up the career of writer-director James Cameron and demonstrating that its hulking Austrian star with the unpronounceable last name might, indeed, be destined for greater things than Conan the Barbarian. Taking his cue from George Butler, who spotlighted the engaging young Schwarzenegger in his 1977 weightlifting documentary Pumping Iron, it was Cameron who first seemed clued in to how deadpan-funny Ah-nuld could be.
Seven years later, Terminator 2: Judgment Day was not only among the first movies to feature eight zeroes in its budget, but was the first ever to become better-known by its ad-slick acronym (T2) than by its proper title. In making the upgrade, some of the intimacy and economy of the first movie had been sacrificed: T2 was both blunter about its anti-nuclear message and murkier in its stance on modern technology. Yet, the movie was a bona fide phenomenon (and deservedly so; few films of any kind have carried two-plus hours of running time more breathlessly), packing such a revolution in visual effects that movies would spend most of the next decade trying to catch up (until one, called The Matrix, finally did). On top of which, in deftly reworking the premise of Shane, Cameron had managed to turn the impassive Schwarzenegger — who had uttered not more than a dozen lines in the original film — into a heroic (if monolithic) father figure, inadvertently laying the groundwork for the actor’s gubernatorial bid.
Cameron seems to have intended for things to end there. Likely, he felt some of the same anxiety that’s been nagging at audiences ever since T3 was first announced — that the idea of surpassing T2’s accomplishments, on a technical level alone, was the very definition of a fool’s errand.
Nothing, though, is impossible, and certainly not where billion-dollar movie franchises are concerned. Not having created the series, director Mostow (late of the submarine thriller U-571) doesn’t have to give a second thought to the notion of topping himself. He knows he can’t outscale T2’s grandiosity, and he doesn’t try — that’s his special freedom. Instead, he’s gone back to basics, to the B-movie beauty of the one that started it all (no matter that T3 cost even more than T2), gambling that audiences — weakened after the June gloom of forbidding, morose or enervatingly hyperactive comic-book movies — are jonesing for just such a down-and-dirty jugular shot of high-test adrenaline.
At the same time, Rise of the Machines may be the most respectful inheritance of a franchise by new filmmakers since Cameron himself got his hands on Aliens. The screenplay, credited to The Game’s John Brancato and Michael Ferris, riffs joyfully on its predecessors, opening with the familiar “arrival” sequences in which the terminators casually appear — crouched down, fully nude and encapsulated in transparent balls — somewhere on the streets of Los Angeles. From there, it’s on to the ritual of obtaining clothes and vehicles, in the course of which the souped-up T-X (the latest terminator model, played by newcomer Kristanna Loken) shows even less trepidation, and much less tact, than the venerable T-101 (Schwarzenegger, carrying his 55 years with unexpected grace). The T-X is more than just the liquid-metal descendant of Robert Patrick’s stone-cold T-1000; with her fiery female exterior and inflatable bust, she can get a lot more accomplished with a lot less effort. (It’s hard to imagine anyone not answering the door for her.) And did I mention that her right arm can, at a moment’s notice, transform itself into a plasma-firing ray gun?
Of course, both machines are after the same thing: John Connor (Nick Stahl), destined — if he survives — to become the leader of human resistance in the coming war of man and machine. (When you think about it, it’s amazing how much juice this now-trilogy has had, given that each film works through what is, essentially, the exact same plot.) Since apparently saving the world at the end of the last installment, Connor has been living “off the grid,” meaning that both the T-X (programmed to destroy not just Connor, but those who will become his lieutenants in the resistance) and the T-101 (mission: to protect and serve) have a spot of trouble locating the now-20-something. And when they do, it’s in the supply room of a veterinary clinic, where the druggie, dropout Connor has broken in for a quick fix of benzodiazepine. This is also where Connor meets up with Claire Danes’ Kate Brewster, a veterinary nurse destined — in one of those indelible time-travel-movie paradoxes — not only to become his future wife, but to send the T-101 back from the future to save him.
Join My Voice Nation for free stuff, film info & more!
Find everything you're looking for in your city
Find the best happy hour deals in your city
Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%
Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city