By Hillel Aron
By Joseph Tsidulko
By Patrick Range McDonald
By David Futch
By Hillel Aron
By Dennis Romero
By Jill Stewart
By Dennis Romero
Dan Koenig keeps an orderly desk. In one high-profile Parker Center posting after another, he’s exuded the image of the consummate LAPD administrator, his reports meticulously presented, his quarters as spotless as a dress uniform on inspection day.
Now the ex-commander, who retired from the LAPD after a 33-year career, brings his meritorious service plaques, his insider’s knowledge and his penchant for order a few floors down to his new job as executive director of the Los Angeles Police Commission, the five-member civilian body that oversees the department.
Inspector general Andre Birotte Jr.’s desk, by contrast, is a shambles. But it soon becomes clear that the former federal prosecutor, promoted by the commission a few weeks after it took on Koenig, is at least as comfortable navigating the seemingly random stacks of paper and assorted files as Koenig is with his clean countertop.
The commission’s two new hires in May complete a revamping of a police-oversight structure that Mayor James Hahn began soon after his 2001 election. With questions about the extent of Rampart police corruption still unanswered and a consent decree for federal monitoring of the LAPD in place, Hahn appointed a commission dominated by experienced City Hall insiders. The panel, headed by attorney and real estate developer Rick Caruso, in turn dropped Bernard Parks as police chief, allowing Hahn to tap William Bratton for the spot.
Koenig takes over for Joe Gunn, a former LAPD officer and cop-show screenwriter with a name, and a visage, tailor-made for television. Birotte was the understudy of Jeffrey Eglash, the second person to fill the job of inspector general, probing allegations of wrongdoing at the LAPD and spearheading the copious audits required by the consent decree. Both are enjoying the honeymoon granted to city officials destined to find themselves, at some point, in the crossfire of controversy. But like most of Hahn’s police commissioners, neither man is a newcomer, and both have established track records of getting along with the chief, the top LAPD brass, the commission and each other to a far greater extent than did their predecessors.
For example, after Eglash stepped down, Caruso noted that then-interim inspector general Birotte “understands the proper role of the inspector general, unlike the last one.” Eglash battled to extract information about officers from Parks, and Parks lashed back about what he called unwarranted interference and a failure to follow proper procedures. Eglash’s relationship with Gunn was cordial, but Gunn clashed repeatedly with Eglash’s predecessor, Katharine Mader, over salary and, most important, access to information.
In the midst of the current honeymoon period, City Council members Jack Weiss and Cindy Miscikowski have asked for a working group to formulate proposals for broader authority — and, perhaps, greater independence — for the inspector general, whose job is to examine allegations of wrongdoing at the LAPD. The two council members are seeking new rules that will allow, or require, the I.G. to report to the council. Some observers are asking for new rules that would bar the commission from blocking an I.G. probe, as it can do now.
Eglash sought such powers but the proposal did not sit well with Caruso, who called the inspector general the “eyes and ears of the commission,” answerable only to that body. Birotte’s approach to being cut loose, somewhat, from the commission’s oversight has been diplomatic.
Koenig, for his part, fiercely defends the concept of a civilian body overseeing the LAPD. He sees the inspector general as being very much a commission staff position. He notes that he and Birotte will necessarily find themselves on the opposite sides of some issues but insists that clashes are unnecessary — and unlikely. “Both Andre Birotte and I are very independent people, but very respectful of each other’s opinion,” Koenig said.
The good feelings and camaraderie are a blessing to the commission and department officials — but that does not necessarily mean they are a good thing.
One City Hall insider reacted to Koenig’s appointment with alarm.
“Don’t expect any revolution,” he said. “He’s there to protect the interests of the traditionalists in Parker Center. And as for the new I.G., he has to declare his independence. From everybody. At a time when the culture is supposed to be changing, these guys aren’t getting it.”
USC law professor Erwin Chemerinsky agreed. Chemerinsky authored a study highly critical of the LAPD’s Rampart Board of Inquiry report — authored by Koenig — and has long taken exception to the model of the inspector general as the “eyes and ears” of the Police Commission. He said that was not what the Christopher Commission had in mind over a decade ago when it called for an inspector general as part of a response to the Rodney King beating.
“The inspector general should be truly independent,” Chemerinsky said. “The two I.G.s we have had so far were terrific, but both were largely unsuccessful in what they were trying to accomplish because there was too much control from the commission and its staff.”
Koenig, 54, grew up in the San Fernando Valley. He was a Navy veteran with two tours of duty in Vietnam when he married his best friend’s sister, then enrolled in the Police Academy. He professed that police work was never a goal and that he was somewhat surprised to find himself in an LAPD uniform after being raised by a family of firefighters. His grandfather, an Irish immigrant, was a fireman in Boston, and his father, two brothers, three uncles and four cousins were Los Angeles firefighters.