Top

news

Stories

 

Busting Unions

Progressives can do it, too

Last March, Tamara Rettino answered a help-wanted ad for Greenpeace. ”Hiring activists,“ it read. ”I thought I could work my way up to the Greenpeace office in Amsterdam,“ Rettino recalls. Once hired, though, she learned she wasn‘t working for Greenpeace at all, but for the Fund for Public Interest Research, which contracts out its staff at 10 offices nationwide to raise money for Greenpeace.

And, it seems, activist employees weren’t actually all that welcome: When the overworked and underpaid directors of the Fund‘s L.A. Greenpeace Project lodged a complaint with the state labor board and informed their bosses they wanted to form a union, they quickly found themselves out of work. A week after the complaint was filed, the office was closed.

The work itself was difficult, with long hours in the sun at places like Santa Monica’s Third Street Promenade, struggling to convince passersby to pay to join Greenpeace, often working extra unpaid hours to get post cards signed to fight offshore oil drilling. Most of the staff, though, was idealistic enough not to mind. ”I‘ve got a master’s degree and I was earning eight to nine dollars an hour,“ says Brande Jackson, the L.A. office‘s former assistant director, ”but wages weren’t even an issue.“

What was at issue was the Fund‘s consistent failure to reimburse staffers for out-of-pocket expenses -- Jackson says she was owed about $500 for gas and office supplies -- and its denial of promised health benefits to most employees. Rettino says she began asking for health coverage after four months on the job. When she quit in mid-January, one week before the staff was locked out, she still hadn’t received coverage. ”I had a really bad kidney infection,“ Rettino says. ”Because I had no health benefits, I couldn‘t get health care. It just got worse and worse. Last week I ended up in the hospital on IV antibiotics.“ (The Fund has since agreed to reimburse her for her hospital bills, Rettino says, but only after she threatened to take them to court.) Dan Binaei, the former office director, says he tried for months to get benefits for himself and his staff. ”I was given vague answers, the runaround.“

Finally, on January 14, directors Binaei and Jackson requested a petition to unionize from the state labor board, e-mailed it to regional director Ben Flamm and Ed Johnson, the national canvass director for the Fund for Public Interest, and told them they intended to unionize. On the evening of January 22, as Binaei was closing the office, he says, Flamm and Johnson, who are based in Berkeley and Minneapolis, respectively, walked in. ”I was totally shocked,“ Binaei says. Johnson, he says, told him, ”We no longer have trust in you to run this office. We feel you no longer trust the organization. You’re terminated as of right now.“ Jackson was also fired, informed in a voice mail the next morning that her ”employee status [had] changed.“

That night, Flamm and Johnson packed up the office. By morning it had been cleaned out. The locks had been changed and a note left on the door said simply that the office was closed. To date, Jackson says, she has not been given a reason for her firing.

Johnson and Flamm both refused to comment on the office closing, citing ”confidential personnel matters.“ According to Greenpeace spokesperson Kymberly Escobar, the environmentalist organization is ”looking into the matter with the Fund for Public Research. We‘re encouraging them to do the right thing.“

In the meantime, Binaei and Jackson have complained to the state labor board about the Fund for Public Interest’s union-busting, and intend to take the Fund to court for wrongful termination. ”Nobody‘s out to damage Greenpeace,“ Jackson says. ”It was our intention to make this organization run better through that union. They chose to bury their heads.“

 
  • Royal2hiphop 04/24/2011 12:18:00 AM

    I just applied online for them, and it sounded too good to be true and I just found this article. Im still in high school and needed quick summer cash, so thankfully I found this and if they choose to call me, I wont be attending anything affiliated with them.

  • Royal2hiphop 04/24/2011 12:18:00 AM

    I just applied online for them, and it sounded too good to be true and I just found this article. Im still in high school and needed quick summer cash, so thankfully I found this and if they choose to call me, I wont be attending anything affiliated with them.

  • Tianwang Tian 04/21/2011 8:14:00 PM

    I was approached by them yesterday. They looked very eager and suspicious. Very luckily I didn't go to their information session/interview. They didn't even review your resume before giving you an interview.

  • Jamie C 08/26/2010 1:06:00 PM

    I am a former employee from the Sacramento call-center. I worked there in the summer of 2008 for about a month, calling former donors (basically the folks who gave their phone numbers when they gave money to a canvasser). I was ok at it--I had things I was told to work on and that I did, and I was at or above quota for a few weeks so they gave me a slight raise from about minimum wage I think it was. About a week later they tell me that my last week I had been below quota (so about the week after they gave me the raise), and that if I didn't bring it up the next week, I would be let go. Of course, they forgot to tell me this until a few days into the next week's cycle, and not until the end of the night, and so I only had two days left that week to get back above quota. My first day, I got above quota and did really well. I went in the next day, and I didn't do too well my first half of my shift. I got a few small donations, but nothing serious. After the director had a quick, sorta-kinda pep-talk with me about my performance, I came to the conclusion that a big part of my problem was that I was getting too nervous and psyching myself out. I went back in after my break with a positive outlook and I performed really well, totally turning around my performance from the first half of the shift. I went to the director after my shift and asked if I had made quota for the week, and he agreed that I had done much better that second half, and he said that it looked really close, but that he would have to do some math and that he would get back to me within the half hour. He called while I was walking to the bus stop and told me that I had not made quota and he let me go. He seemed sorta bummed out, and for all I know maybe he really was. The organization is just a money-hungry bureaucracy, and like all bureaucracies, the people in it are frustrated, over-worked, ineffective, and often feel the need to compromise their values. Oh, and don't expect any kind of real training. The whole time we were just raising money for really vague causes, calling people and talking to them about their local issues from a script. We were based in Sacramento, but the call center was raising money for a bunch of organizations tied to the Fund, often calling on behalf of groups based in other states like Maryland, New Jersey, and Hawaii and calling saying we were representing those groups. I consider myself a very informed person, and I pay attention to various social and environmental issues all the time, yet I still knew very little about most of the things I was raising money for, and when I asked for more info I was just referred to a binder that compiled a bunch of the various the different pamphlets and talking points related to the different campaigns we were raising money for, but that binder rarely had much info in it either, and again, it was nothing more than talking points. The only way to really know anything about the specifics of various pieces of legislation we were raising money for was to spend time off doing unpaid research. Obviously they didn't care at all about if their employees actually supported their causes or not, but only look at their employees as fund-raisers. Also, the pay was obviously paltry. I never minded much though since I was home on break from college and was basically just saving up for the next year. If I had been on my own though (like I am now) I would have cared more. Even still, my most recent job also was at a local non-profit and the pay was actually lower, but I was there for a year and still would be if the program hadn’t lost funding. I felt respected and valued there, unlike when working for the Fund. I was actually quite glad to be let go from the Fund because I was so sick of them after that one month. So, ff you like working for ineffective bureaucracies and think that the best way to change the world is to always raise a bunch of money but never do any real constructive organizing, than by all means, work for the Fund. But, if like myself, you are attracted to real grassroots struggle and organizing, stay the hell away from this bloated shell of a progressive/environmentalist organization. They make clear time and again that all they care about is making as much money as possible, with no regard for their employees or the values the Fund claims to stand for.

  • Jimothy Eugene Jr 07/09/2010 12:00:00 PM

    My girlfriend just literally got fired an hour and a half ago by this organization, 2 days after she was on the job. And the reason she got? "We decided to let you go because it's better for you." Hard working is not the standard for this place. They only care about how much money you can raise. If you think you can make people to donate you money every couple hours? this is the place for you. Otherwise, stay away and be sure to tell the others.

  • Emerald Bixby 07/06/2010 12:53:00 AM

    I was a canvasser at the Boulder office of Fund for the Public Interest almost immediately after the dates the above comment describes. I knew someone had recently been fired and new people were in new positions, but boy was the above sugar-coated and hidden well! Shortly before I was fired for failing to make quota, a director I knew was fired abruptly, and only vague, dismissive answers were given about the situation. I learned later of ways she had been conned by the Fund's quota debt schemes and overworking of directors. None of the above, in the article or Charlie's comment, is any surprise to me. I appreciate testimonials and publicity like those, because the Fund is truly underexposed. After I worked for them, I noticed more and more how they recruit naive students, how they train their employees to manipulate the very social problems they stand to change (canvassing for HRC outside the gay dorm, using different terminology to attract different ethnicities, playing up injuries), and other ways that they hypocritically drill money from the population they're pretending to help. I'm appalled at the quashing of the unionizing. I'm glad there's some action to get involved with in this area against their recruitment tactics, and later hopefully their employee treatment.

  • Charlie V. Pugh 09/02/2009 7:12:00 AM

    On August 15, 2009, I was fired from the Fund. I had worked there in the Boulder office for 3-1/2 years and was the longest running canvasser in the office. I was the senior canvasser in the office as well. On June 29, 2009, I had a bicycle accident on my day off. I severely injured my left knee, breaking the patella and rupturing the quad. I HAD KP insurance at the time, one of the very few canvassers who get it. I was in extreme pain at the time, but went back to work three days later when I was told by KP that I would be in pain but I could put weight on my leg. I canvassed and made quota for the next six weeks. The seventh week, I failed to make quota for CoPIRG and was fired by the Regional Director, Joe Rupp, allegedly for not making quota three times. My CD tried to argue with him, explaining that he was putting their most long running and loyal employee on the street with no job, disabled and not able to get a job (I am legally disabled in the state of Colorado and have the paperwork to prove it. The RD knew full well that I had had the injury but never contacted me, nor did anyone else in the Fund, except for the office CD and AD's. They did everything they could to get me through. The policy they fired me under will be shown to be a non-policy. No written warnings or any warnings at all. The RD called the CD about three hours before the end of the day to tell him to fire me if I didn't make quota. He was absolutely closed to any argument. Rhe RD, Joe Rupp, knew about the prior alleged quota miss incident when it happened, but waited until that Saturday to use it. I have copies of their policy and they didn't even follow that. On top of it, their own policy says that the disabled must be given special consideration. I had told them that I was planning to go on temp disability the next week as I simply physically could not continue with the injury. I am 58 yrs old and have gone full time since I started. Most canvassers last a week, a Summer at most. I have seen literally hundreds of them come and go. The policy I was fired under will be shown to be arbitrary, and discretionary for use as convenient. Records will show just how many people have (not only in my office, but all offices) just how often this "policy" is used in an arbitrary manner (usually when the office is desperate to keep canvassers). Hope you find this of interest. Charlie V. Pugh Boulder, CO September 1, 2009

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy