Overstated and overrated
Re: Gay Shame [June 915]. The L.A. Weekly has once again allowed Douglas Sadownick to ramble endlessly in a poorly thought-out mishmash of circular logic and hoary overstatement. First of all, Sadownick offers little to justify his unwavering support for Clinton despite the mans repeated betrayal of gays. A Republican president would be excoriated for such miserable legislation as Dont ask, dont tell, which has been linked to an increase in harassment of gays in the military. Then, while freely admitting that Bush is largely an unknown quantity on gay issues (he has at least met with the gay Log Cabin Republicans), Sadownick has the nerve to compare a Bush win in November to Hitlers ascension to power in the early 1930s. How does he expect to be taken seriously as a journalist?
Regardless of who becomes president in November, gay civil rights will only advance when a majority of voters support them. Radical activists and anti-assimilationists do little to advance that goal. In fact, the threatening, hyperbolic tone used by people like Sadownick has probably done more to undermine gay causes than all the Dr. Lauras and Senator Knights combined.
Also, you might want to rethink the Jesus Christ was gay photo caption. I know all you hip urban liberals think that kind of thing is funny, but there are an awful lot of Christians in this country (some of whom are not even right-wing extremists) who find such statements patently offensive. Can gays really afford the political capital such antics undoubtedly cost?
Eileen Blass Winnetka
I like reading the extreme-left perspective of the L.A. Weekly, but Im growing bored with filtering the offensive bile out of the articles. Is it your goal to turn others away? Insulting and skewed remarks litter Weekly articles like a Tijuana street. Is that the rep you guys are going for offensive liberal rather than liberal offensive?
Cullen McGraw Los Angeles
While I agree with Mr. Sadow nick that the prospects of Bush Jr. as president are rather scary, I think his article is deeply flawed. The comparison with Weimar Germany and the Jews is ridiculous at best, offensive at worst. Furthermore, the whitewashing of Clinton as the great president of gay America is ill-informed. Clinton has failed to effect lasting positive change on gay issues; hiring gays and lesbians is not going to have much effect beyond his presidency, as Mr. Sadownick points out himself. The last president to effect lasting change was Bush Sr., under whom the ban on gay and lesbian immigrants was lifted. Most of the progress in the last few years is due to state courts declaring anti-sodomy laws unconstitutional, as well as supporting gay and lesbian families (e.g., in Vermont).
Robert Grimm Seattle
Lets not forget Clinton and Gore completely wimped out on gays in the military and havent put any teeth into hate laws. Republican gay bashers live at the extreme radical fringe of the GOP and, as such, are nonplayers. Bush may not talk the talk of the two-faced Clinton, but hes politician enough to know that he cant afford to alienate this constituency. Lets get real here. Clinton isnt and never has been a supporter. He may say he is, but his actions prove otherwise.
Tony Assenza Canoga Park
Regarding Douglas Sadownicks article Gay Shame, I have to question the thought process of a writer who calls Bushs policies Orwellian then proceeds to cry because these policies will be a detriment to so-called hate crime bills. Adding additional punishment to a criminal because of what he was thinking or what he believed at the time of the crime is Orwellian in its own right. It is also unequal protection under the law.
Cam Cannon Los Angeles
I am greatly disturbed at being misquoted in Doug Sadownicks article. I never said that Personally speaking . . . Clinton has been a disaster on all levels, and, as should be obvious from some of the other quotes attributed to me in the article, I dont believe that. I spoke at length with Sadownick and made it clear that I think Clinton has done more for lesbians and gay men than any prior president. His weakness in dealing with ongoing discrimination in the military and marriage does not erase his important contributions to gay equality.