By Catherine Wagley
By Catherine Wagley
By Wendy Gilmartin
By Jennifer Swann
By Claire de Dobay Rifelj
By L.A. Weekly critics
By Catherine Wagley
By Zachary Pincus-Roth
These days, a prominent “rock critic” can pen a book about her allegedly bohemian life, then turn around and write a piece in her regular outlet, The New York Times, that seeks (and, jumpin’ Jesus, finds!) virtue in the manufactured vacuity of ’N Sync and Backstreet Boys. This sorry combo of faux hipsterism and mainstream ass kiss is par for the ill-kempt course in the field of music writing circa 2000.
Middle-aged obsessives with long memories may recall an era when writing about rock & roll was a truly transgressive act. Rock criticism as a form was born and bred in the mid- and late ’60s, and the most exciting voices of that epoch belonged to a triumvirate that James Wolcott later dubbed “the Noise Boys” — Richard Meltzer, Nick Tosches and the late Lester Bangs. These style-flashing outlaws raised the bar of outrage so high in their heyday that others have been content to limbo under it ever since.
Bangs was the most lionized of these writers, in life and in death; in 1987, five years after his demise from an accidental overdose of Darvon, his collection Psychotic Reactions & Carburetor Dung, posthumously compiled by Greil Marcus, was published between hard covers. Chicago Sun-Times rock critic Jim DeRogatis’ amusingly self-reflexive bio, Let It Blurt, continues this canonization.
Born into a family of Southern California Jehovah’s Witnesses and raised on a teenage diet of jazz records, Jack Kerouac, cheap speed and Romilar cough syrup, Bangs was rock criticism’s original True Believer and gonzo saint. His writing for Rolling Stone, Creem (where he did his most memorable work) and dozens of other publications from 1969 on combined a fervent belief in the power of rock music, a cannily streetwise aesthetic, and an amped-up, Beat-derived, nakedly honest style pulsating with energy and commitment. (The best thing in DeRogatis’ book may be Bangs’ “How To Be a Rock Critic,” a mocking take on the profession first published in an obscure fanzine in 1974 and reprinted as an appendix.) Sadly, this prescient champion of the rock & roll faith also became a self-destructive victim of standard-issue rock excess, and of his self-fabricated image. (It isn’t surprising that Bangs was an avid early reader of Hunter S. Thompson.) As one girlfriend notes, “A lot of people used him to be ‘Lester Bangs’ — this outrageous persona.”
DeRogatis — who was once described to me as “a guy who likes rock criticism more than he does rock music” — interviewed Bangs just two weeks before he died, and doubtless would have us believe the torch of rock-crit integrity was passed during that brief encounter. His mad love for his hero leads the biographer to occasionally turn a blind eye on some discomforting matters in Bangs’ life; for instance, evidence of the late critic’s long-term sexual abuse as a youth by a neighbor is dispensed with in a single paragraph. Though Bangs’ emotional immaturity and terminal excesses receive detailed treatment in Let It Blurt, DeRogatis says in the book’s early pages, “I do not see this book as a tragedy.” Yet how can the tale of a gifted writer who died at 33, leaving behind little more than some scattered reviews, two quickie fan books and a wild-man rep senselessly emulated by idolatrous twerps, be considered anything but?
It was Richard Meltzer who told me that Bangs had died: He broke the news about his friend matter-of-factly at a Los Angeles Readersoftball game on May 1, 1982, the day after Bangs was found dead in his New York apartment. At the time, Meltzer was a columnist at the Reader, and I was its “rock critic.” We knew each other, but did not hang together. My name appears, cryptically, on Page 383 of Meltzer’s new anthology, A Whore Just Like the Rest.
Therein, Meltzer makes the claim, more than once, that he “invented” rock criticism, but what he fabricated bears no resemblance to the cold puke that passes for rock writing today. As a failed philosophy major and pioneer critic at Crawdaddy in the mid-’60s, Meltzer to be sure created a handy set of purloinable, highly utilitarian writing devices (some of which, including [ahem] gratuitous/nongratuitous citations of Kant, Jasper Johns and, I dunno, Bobo Brazil, are contained within THESE VERY FUCKING PARENTHESES!) that have been lifted ad nauseam by far less gifted adherents. But his finest and truest work isn’t criticism at all. It’s a sui generis art project, in which music is the ostensible springboard for an irreverent/irrelevant consideration/nonconsideration of the matter at hand — pure writing-as-writing, as he might put it.
Thus, we get the J. Geils Band’s album The Morning After considered as a checkers game; a “review” of Creedence Clearwater Revival’s Pendulum with a “built-in echo” effect; a preview of a Railroad Jerk show that “confuses” the New York band with saxophonist Roland Kirk; write-ups of concerts never attended and albums never listened to; literally blow-by-blow accounts of label-sponsored debauchery on tours and promotional junkets; and deliriously candid autobiographical confessions in the guise of “music journalism.” It was never really possible to learn anything about the purported subject of a Meltzer piece, for, as he himself points out in an introductory note in A Whore, “What I’ve done . . . is lure you into taking an interest in ME.”
Find everything you're looking for in your city
Find the best happy hour deals in your city
Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%
Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city