Page 2 of 3
Though residents were less hostile, the conversion idea also got flak at a community meeting hosted by Reed Middle School in North Hollywood. And in the east San Fernando Valley, the proposed conversion of Sun Valley Middle School has been shelved because the campus is adjacent to a landfill. New regulations on school construction near landfills would raise steep regulatory hurdles, according to district staff.
Though the conversion plan has stalled, the primary-center initiative got a boost last week from allies of Mayor Richard Riordan. Attorney OMalley Miller, a partner in Munger, Tolles & Olson, proposed enlisting private developers, using pre-approved specifications, to build the primary centers. The developers would manage the entire project, including financing, then hand over the school, and their bill, to L.A. Unified.
Millers idea evolved from more than two years as chairman of the mayors Primary Center Task Force. This advisory group was established to help the district build 10 primary centers a year. We gave it our best shot, and got four of them open in two and a half years, said Miller. But when thats the best you can do, you have to try a better approach. He added, How many schools did the school district on its own start and open in that time? None, zero.
The last straw, he said, was the misplacement of two additional primary centers. One of them occupies part of a public alley; another intrudes on private property. The school districts full-time surveying staff, he added, is neither qualified nor properly certified.
Through sheer bureaucratic ineptitude on a breathtaking scale, the school district has been unable to build enough schools so that children can be educated within a reasonable distance from their homes, said Miller, who is not related to district COO Howard Miller.
At the moment, however, the OMalley Miller plan is little more than a brainstorm. Noted Miller: A reporter asked me if I could send him an outline of the proposal on paper. I told him, It doesnt exist.
In fact, much of the districts facilities strategy is downright ephemeral. It does seem a bit uncertain, said one senior staffer, who requested anonymity. We dont know what its going to be like next week. I dont think Howard Miller has any trouble making decisions. But the staff is having difficulty trying to obtain the information he wants and keep up with their other tasks. Mostly its a manpower issue.
The last several months have seen the departures of the most senior district administrators with a say in facilities matters, but to some observers, Miller himself is part of the problem. One of the historic sins of the school district has been a culture of withholding information with the idea that either people dont need to know or that someone knows better, said architect Michael Lehrer, vice chair of the local school-bond oversight committee. In a public mission of this scale, transparency is of itself a huge achievement.
Like other Miller initiatives, the conversion plan was presented like a done deal, said Lehrer. The problem is that its completely dependent on our faith in the ability of one person, or a group of people, to propose a project of staggering complexity. Howard Miller is holding his cards so close to his chest, and I dont understand why.
Miller was not available for an interview, but has publicly outlined his general plans, and attended community meetings, as in South Gate. Miller does understand the importance of community buy-in, said East L.A. Community College President Ernest H. Moreno, who is teaming with L.A. Unified to build class space on his campus. It was at Millers behest that Moreno decided to consult again with faculty members over the joint venture.
School board member Caprice Young defended Millers ideas as holding great promise. Were still trying to get things done with a broken system, said Young. We have to fix the system and get things built at the same time.
Inevitably, time is lost as Miller struggles to assemble a staff. The void is being filled in part by consultants and by business figures with ties to the mayor. The staff report on alternatives to Belmont is being assembled by Edwin Van Ginkel, of the Arthur Anderson consulting firm. Veteran developer and Riordan ally Stuart Ketchum has been sitting in on negotiations to acquire the Ambassador Hotel site. And OMalley Miller has assembled a working group to pilot the private-development scenario. His team includes Anita Landecker, a business associate of Riordan friend Bill Siart, who has started a firm to develop public charter schools.
Every time I meet a new consultant, I have some reservations as to why that person is here, commented one staffer. Are they necessary? Whats the real motive? Is their loyalty to the district or to their pocketbook?