Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

Most Popular

SLIDESHOWS

National Features >

  • Village Voice

    The Great Walls of Chinatown

    With the exception of the electric rice cookers, this Bowery tenement could have come straight from the Nineteenth Century.

    By Elizabeth Dwoskin

  • Houston Press

    Getting Off

    DUI attorney Tyler Flood wins 80 percent of his trials--even if his clients were 100 percent drunk.

    By Mike Giglio

  • Miami New Times

    Park or Die Tryin'

    From the homeless parking mafia to the meter fairy, finding a spot in Miami has taken a turn toward the surreal.

    By Gus Garcia-Roberts

  • City Pages

    The Baddest Men on the Planet

    Straight from the Sam's Club tire shop, Brett Rogers prepares to meet Fedor Emelianenko in mortal combat.

    By Bradley Campbell

Be Social

  • rss

Pulp Fiction

David Fincher's Fight Club

Manohla Dargis

Published on October 21, 1999

A slap-happy critique of capitalism, a stroke movie for girls and boys, a romp, a satire, a dirge and a folly -- David Fincher‘s Fight Club is a film about no limits, in both its subject and its own creation. It’s about secret fraternities in which men voluntarily beat one another to a pulp, and, on a purely visual level, it‘s the most powerful and viscerally exciting movie to come out of Hollywood this year. Which doesn’t mean that it‘s all good. As with Fincher’s second feature, Seven, this new film is a blowout of spasmodic writing, foolish ideas and aesthetic leaps of faith held together, though sometimes barely, by the force of the director‘s natural talent and a pair of sympathetic, smartly matched lead performances. As a story, Fight Club is confused, inconsistent, contradictory, sometimes even a little tedious, but there are moments of filmmaking greatness in it that prove again that the most thrilling movies aren’t always the most tidy or those with the most convivial view of the world. But as Edward Norton‘s unnamed narrator cheerily explains, as his mouth wells with blood, there’s a limit to how much you can swallow before you begin gagging.

Based on Chuck Palahniuk‘s debut novel, a pungently funny stream of bile of the same name, Fight Club is about a cult of masculinity that starts in the shadows, which means it’s also self-reflexively about the movies. (The scrupulous adaptation is by newcomer Jim Uhls.) More abstractly, the film is about the loss of meaning at the end of the millennium, or maybe it‘s just about how hard it is to get by when your job and love life stink. There’s more in this overstuffed picture, too, and among the obvious targets are self-help groups, yuppie nesting, consumerism, celebrity, franchise coffee, extreme sports and, most slyly, the men‘s movement, all of which are filleted without mercy. The ultimate men’s self-help group, though, is the titular fight club that Norton‘s character creates with a new friend, Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt), an artisan soap manufacturer. Against the odds (it’s a puzzle what the cool Durden sees in this sad sack), the two bond over pitchers of beer, a ritual that unaccountably leads to a playful invitation to fight. One punch gets thrown, then another and another. Before long, men across the country are beating one another nearly senseless, finding their bliss at the end of a bone-crushing right hook.

The prelude to this carnage is insomnia. The narrator, a suit who spends his days tucked in a cubicle or strapped to an airplane seat, is a cost-benefit analyst who earns his living by deciding which defective car models to recall and which to keep on the road. Single, successful enough, but plagued by sleeplessness, he visits a doctor for sleeping pills and is rebuffed. You want to know what real pain is, the doctor asks, visit Remaining Men Together. The narrator does, and in a church basement cluttered with chairs, he thirstily drinks in the misery of men in the throes of testicular cancer, letting their anguish fill his emptiness. When it‘s time for the evening’s sob-in, a former bodybuilder named Bob (played by the singer Meat Loaf) clinches the narrator, who surprises himself by imprinting a Rorschach blot of tears between the giant‘s pendulous, steroid-inflated breasts. The suit is hooked. An unmitigated junkie, he begins mainlining pain: With a bland smile and a phony name tag, he sits in on groups for tuberculosis, leukemia, sickle-cell anemia and brain parasites, opening his chakras, visualizing his power, basking in sorrow. Yet only with the fight club can the voyeur himself become a victim, a role he giddily welcomes, blow by blow.

For its first hour, Fight Club is a house on fire. Fincher sets up the story with terrific force, deploying one visually witty, fantastical image after another. In one scene, the camera races inside a brain, scudding along neurons like Philippe Petit on a wire. In another, the narrator seems to have stepped inside a home-furnishings catalog: As he orders by phone, a brochure splayed open in his hands, chairs, tables and gewgaws with Scandinavian-sounding names materialize around him, nearly crowding him out of the picture. The director is clearly having a blast, not just running with the material but juicing it, giving it a depth not always evident in Palahniuk’s book. Not surprisingly, the fight scenes are miniature tours de force, visually and aurally: The wet smack of flesh on concrete never sounded as real or grotesque. As in Seven, Fincher is pushing the sound far beyond what we think of as realism to create a dense sonic texture every bit as thick and mysterious as the images onscreen. (For the first time, his cinematographer isn‘t his past master of darkness, Darius Khondji, but Jeff Cronenweth, who lights much of the film just above the threshold of visibility.)

Fincher is a virtuoso, but he knows how to direct actors, not just fiddle with buttons. Norton makes an ideal center of the storm -- his unremarkable, regular-Joe looks and well-modulated, slightly adenoidal voice lull us into the madness, almost without our noticing. When he tells us things, we believe them -- fully and without question. Even when his actions don’t make sense -- snuggling between Bob‘s chemical breasts, sacrificing blood in a circle jerk of pain, blowing off Helena Bonham Carter’s token female -- Norton‘s narrator squeezes a crazy kind of meaning from the nuttiness, even during the film’s final meltdown. For his part, Pitt vamps, glides and eases through Fight Club like a silky cat, riding the film‘s high notes where Norton stays low, and proving once again that he’s far better, and seemingly more comfortable, burrowing into a character than playing the star. It‘s not that Pitt can’t act (as I impatiently decreed earlier this year), it‘s that he won’t -- especially when called on to be a swooning romantic lead. The actor is invariably better, more natural and alive, wearing funny glasses in movies like 12 Monkeys than playing waxwork dummies in movies like Meet Joe Black.

1   2   Next Page »