Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

Most Popular

SLIDESHOWS

National Features >

  • Village Voice

    The Great Walls of Chinatown

    With the exception of the electric rice cookers, this Bowery tenement could have come straight from the Nineteenth Century.

    By Elizabeth Dwoskin

  • Houston Press

    Getting Off

    DUI attorney Tyler Flood wins 80 percent of his trials--even if his clients were 100 percent drunk.

    By Mike Giglio

  • Miami New Times

    Park or Die Tryin'

    From the homeless parking mafia to the meter fairy, finding a spot in Miami has taken a turn toward the surreal.

    By Gus Garcia-Roberts

  • City Pages

    The Baddest Men on the Planet

    Straight from the Sam's Club tire shop, Brett Rogers prepares to meet Fedor Emelianenko in mortal combat.

    By Bradley Campbell

Be Social

  • rss

The Last Laugh

Chronicling the Hollywood cartoon

Charles Solomon

Published on July 15, 1999

image
Courtesy Hanna-Barbera
THE HOLLYWOOD CARTOON REPRESENTS A uniquely American contribution to film and comedy. Mickey Mouse capering in his Sorcerer's Apprentice robes, Bugs Bunny crunching a carrot, Donald Duck throwing a tantrum and Wile E. Coyote smashing into a cliff are familiar to audiences throughout the world, and they represent America to more people than the bald eagle.

Over the last decade, the success of Disney features and the popularity of prime-time cartoons, led by The Simpsons, have catapulted interest in animation to an even higher level: Top animators have become celebrities. In previous decades, however, animators worked in anonymity. It was during this time -- the dark days of the '70s and early '80s, when "animation" meant Saturday-morning cartoons and the occasional Disney feature --- that Michael Barrier interviewed every studio artist he could find. In three decades of research, he spoke to more than 200 cartoon-industry veterans. His history has been called "the Godot of animation books," because people have waited so long for it to appear.

Hollywood Cartoons: American Animation in Its Golden Age has finally been published, and while it's comprehensive in many ways, animation fans can only wish Barrier had used the enormous amount of information he compiled more effectively, and produced a more entertaining and appealing book. Barrier is fascinated by the minutiae of the drawn animation process, and at times loses the forest not for the trees, but for the individual pine needles. He reports which animators drew which scenes in various cartoons, notes the amount of footage Warner Bros. animators were expected to produce each week and names the artists who drew the character layouts for several Tex Avery shorts. But he fails to explain what made Felix the Cat so popular with audiences all over the world during the '20s, or why Mickey Mouse became even more popular during the '30s.

The artists at Disney, Fleischer, Warner Bros., MGM and the other studios created a new kind of film comedy that was funny in unique ways. Despite his obvious love for the studio animation process, Barrier doesn't have much feeling for that humor. Take, for example, Avery's Bad Luck Blackie (1949). It builds from a simple premise: A nasty bulldog torments a kitten until a black cat shows up. The cat gives the kitten a whistle; each time it's blown, the cat appears and crosses the bulldog's path, causing an increasingly heavy object to clobber the bully. Director Chuck Jones calls Blackie "one of the most perfect cartoons ever made"; Barrier dismisses it, saying, "It runs down in its second half."

Barrier criticizes Bill Tytla's animation of Tchernobog at the end of the "Night on Bald Mountain" sequence of Fantasia (when the black god strains against the irresistible power of the dawn), claiming that it "suffers from a faint but perceptible stop-motion quality. Each movement, each drawing, is a shade too discrete." Lovers of Fantasia might wonder if Barrier watched the same film.

Finally, Hollywood Cartoons'lack of visuals is a major -- and surprising --- shortcoming. It contains only 50 illustrations, none of them in color. Examples of the artists' work are needed to supplement the text and remind readers of special moments in their favorite films: Bugs Bunny appearing as Brünnhilde in What's Opera, Doc, Mickey Mouse tap-dancing with a deck of cards in Thru the Mirror, KoKo the clown's eerie, metamorphic performance of "The St. James Infirmary Blues" in the Betty Boop Snow-White. A handful of black-and-white stills might be acceptable in a book from a small printer, but readers have a right to expect a more appealing presentation from Oxford University Press. And fans of animation -- which includes almost everyone under 60 in America -- have a right to a better book.

ALTHOUGH ISSUED BY A SMALLER PUBLISHER AND aimed primarily at an academic audience, Reading the Rabbit: Explorations in Warner Bros. Animation, an anthology, contains fascinating material about the Warner Bros. cartoons and their creators. Linda Simensky traces the merchandising of the Looney Tunes characters -- which has grown into a multibillion-dollar industry -- and notes how the personalities of the characters have been softened to make them more appealing as products. Bugs Bunny and Yosemite Sam played on the same basketball team in Space Jam; Sylvester no longer tries to eat Tweety, and Granny has stopped belting him with her umbrella -- they solve mysteries together on TV. Later in the book, Bill Mikulak examines the legal battles between the studio and fans who create art and fiction on the Web involving their favorite characters, but he declines to examine the psychological quirks that lead to erotic fantasies involving Minerva Mink and other cartoon animals.

These intriguing essays, however, are balanced against others that are filled with academic buzzwords (metonymy, iconography, paradigm, etc.). In a discussion of Bugs' penchant for drag -- he's appeared as a lady hunter, a Southern belle, the Empress Josephine and a Spanish "senyorit-tar" -- editor Kevin Sandler states, "The Bugs Bunny character can be seen, then, to support a heterosexual, patriarchal discourse that portrays a 'woman's' role in only two ways: either as love object or as asexual subject for masculine-recognized characters like Bugs Bunny." Never ask a Ph.D., "What's up, Doc?"

1   2   Next Page »