By Michael Goldstein
By Dennis Romero
By Sarah Fenske
By Matthew Mullins
By Patrick Range McDonald
By LA Weekly
By Dennis Romero
By Simone Wilson
. . . AND FORGIVE THE
While reading Gary Webb’s "Dark Alliance" [November 6–12], I was reminded of the scene from The Godfather when a Mafia don says, "Let’s keep the drugs with the dark people, the colored . . . They’re animals anyway, so let them lose their souls." Congratulations to the Weekly for printing what the L.A. Times didn’t have the guts to print, and God bless Gary Webb — he should have won the Pulitzer Prize for exposing the greatest scandal of the post–Vietnam War era.—Steve BarrLos Angeles
Thank you for Lina Lecaro’s profile of KROQ’s Rodney Bingenheimer [Reverb issue, November 6–12]. For a sizable number of fans who came of age in the mid-1960s and who still find passion in today’s music, Rodney is irreplaceable. After all these years, there is still no DJ in L.A. who can break a band like Rodney Bingenheimer. Ask Blondie, the Go-Go’s and about 50 others.—Tim DohertyLos Angeles
AND OTHER CLICHÉS
Re: Judith Lewis’ cliché-laden article about her weekend trip to London [Real Gone, October 30–November 5], I lived in London and other places in the U.K. for several years, so when I see articles such as this one, which feed American prejudices, I feel quite annoyed.
First, London is in no way a wilderness. It is quite the opposite. Los Angeles is literally a wilderness, an empty place full of empty-headed people, built on a desert. London is an organic, living, ancient expanse that changes from moment to moment.
Of course, if you go in search of clichés, you will find them. If you expect to find bad food, you will find it if you look hard. A colleague of mine came back from Germany, having stopped at Heathrow for two hours on the way, and told me British food was awful. What did he have? A soggy pizza at 3 a.m. in the airport’s terminal.
As for finding the formal culture of London unrewarding, this is yet more evidence of your journalist’s commitment to being a true Angeleno.—Mark ScottCanoga Park
As a fan of your magazine from the beginning, I was appalled by your ill-informed remarks condoning wholesale slaughtering of innocent horses [election endorsements, October 30–November 5]. And since I work as an animal activist and technical adviser, I must inform you that your magazine, along with the names of your advertisers, has been put on a boycott list that is now being distributed to 27 animal-rights organizations — including the Ark Trust, Fund for Animals and Equus Rescue — whose combined membership numbers in the many hundreds of thousands. Separate letters will be sent to the establishments that advertise in your magazine informing them that their names shall also be included in this boycott list, and will remain there until they cease advertising with you . . .—Cyd EisnerLos Angeles
I would like to commend you on your opposition to Proposition 6. First, by making it a felony to sell or slaughter horses for human consumption, the voters of California have now made it a high offense to be culturally different from the "normal" beef, pork and poultry eaters of this state. By merely participating in their accustomed eating habits, they can now be convicted as felons and face all that that entails (loss of the right to vote, big old "X" on their permanent record, etc.). We have managed to legislate our cultural norms and attach a very heavy price for infraction.
Second, there is nothing in Proposition 6, as far as I can determine, that stops the ongoing slaughter or sale of horses for processing into pet food (it’s okay if Pookie eats Mr. Ed, but not if that damn German next door does), into glue, or whatever else they can make out of a horse carcass.
Look, within five miles of my house, I can buy ostrich burgers, buffalo steak, barbecued pork uterus, cow brains, goat heads, deer (Bambi?) venison, rabbits and probably grub worms if I look hard enough. To place horses on some sort of pedestal is ridiculous at best. In this world, people eat them and have eaten them for a long time. We also ride them, put them in circuses and make them pull plows. They are our pets, yes, but so are pigs, cows and chickens for ä many as well.
I too love horses, and I would never consider eating them — in fact, the only creatures I choose to consume are shellfish — but to dictate my cultural or culinary standards to another person or group would amount to intolerance. I extend my praise to the editors of the L.A. Weekly for grasping and bravely vocalizing the hypocrisy of Proposition 6.—Joe BarrettSunland
Exactly how did you rationalize your rambling, quip-filled, chuckle-a-sentence dismissal of Proposition 6, the initiative measure to ban the slaughter of California horses for human consumption? Your entire justification for the rejection of the initiative seems to boil down to the idea that "some people or peoples prefer eating horses." It’s also true that "some people or peoples" prefer eating dogs and cats, veiling women, enslaving children, and indulging in other habits that we narrow-minded Americans find culturally repugnant. Must a guilt-inflamed sense of accommodation compel us to import other distantly sanctioned cruelties as well?
Find everything you're looking for in your city
Find the best happy hour deals in your city
Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%
Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city